Étienne Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire

Geoffroy was born at Étampes (in present-day Essonne), and studied at the Collège de Navarre, in Paris, where he studied natural philosophy under M. J. Brisson. He then attended the lectures of Daubenton at the College de France and Fourcroy at the Jardin des Plantes. In March 1793 Louis-Jean-Marie Daubenton, through the interest of Bernardin de Saint-Pierre, procured him the office of sub-keeper and assistant demonstrator of the cabinet of natural history, made vacant by the resignation of Bernard Germain Étienne de la Ville, Comte de Lacépède. By a law passed in June 1793, Geoffroy was appointed one of the twelve professors of the newly constituted Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, being assigned the chair of zoology. In the same year he busied himself with the formation of a menagerie at that institution.[1]

In 1794, Geoffroy entered into correspondence with Georges Cuvier. Shortly after the appointment of Cuvier as assistant at the Museum d'Histoire Naturelle, Geoffroy received him into his house. The two friends wrote together five memoirs on natural history, one of which, on the classification of mammals, puts forward the idea of the subordination of characters upon which Cuvier based his zoological system. It was in a paper entitled Histoire des Makis, ou singes de Madagascar, written in 1795, that Geoffroy first gave expression to his views on the unity of organic composition, the influence of which is perceptible in all his subsequent writings; nature, he observes, presents us with only one plan of construction, the same in principle, but varied in its accessory parts.[1]

In 1798, Geoffroy was chosen a member of Napoleon's great scientific expedition to Egypt as part of the natural history and physics section of the Institut d'Égypte; 151[2] scientists and artists participated in the expedition, including Dominique-Vivant Denon, Claude Louis Berthollet, and Jean Baptiste Joseph Fourier. On the capitulation of Alexandria in August 1801, he took part in resisting the claim made by the British general to the collections of the expedition, declaring that, were that demand persisted in, history would have to record that he also had burnt a library in Alexandria. Early in January 1802 Geoffroy returned to Paris. He was elected a member of the French Academy of Sciences in September 1807. In March of the following year Napoleon, who had already recognized his national services by the award of the cross of the legion of honor, selected him to visit the museums of Portugal, for the purpose of procuring collections from them, and in the face of considerable opposition from the British he eventually was successful in retaining them as a permanent possession for his country.[3]

In 1809, the year after his return to France, Geoffroy was made professor of zoology at the faculty of sciences at Paris, and from that period he devoted himself more exclusively than before to anatomical study. In 1818 he published the first part of his celebrated Philosophie anatomique, the second volume of which, published in 1822, and subsequent memoirs account for the formation of monstrosities on the principle of arrest of development, and of the attraction of similar parts.[3]

Cartoon of Geoffroy as an ape, with Cuvier in the background, by Jean Ignace Isidore Gérard Grandville, 1842

Geoffroy's friend Robert Edmund Grant shared his views on unity of plan and corresponded with him while working on marine invertebrates in the late 1820s in Edinburgh (assisted in 1826 and 1827 by his student Charles Darwin) when Grant successfully identified the pancreas in molluscs. When, in 1830, Geoffroy proceeded to apply to the invertebrata his views as to the unity of animal composition, he found a vigorous opponent in Cuvier, his former friend.[3]

Geoffroy, a synthesiser, contended, in accordance with his theory of unity of plan in organic composition, that all animals are formed of the same elements, in the same number; and with the same connections: homologous parts, however they differ in form and size, must remain associated in the same invariable order. With Johann Wolfgang von Goethe he held that there is in nature a law of compensation or balancing of growth, so that if one organ take on an excess of development, it is at the expense of some other part; and he maintained that, since nature takes no sudden leaps, even organs which are superfluous in any given species, if they have played an important part in other species of the same family, are retained as rudiments, which testify to the permanence of the general plan of creation. It was his conviction that, owing to the conditions of life, the same forms had not been perpetuated since the origin of all things, although it was not his belief that existing species are becoming modified.[3]

Cuvier, who was an analytical observer of facts, admitted only the prevalence of laws of co-existence or harmony in animal organs, and maintained the absolute invariability of species, which he declared had been created with a regard to the circumstances in which they were placed, each organ contrived with a view to the function it had to fulfil, thus putting, in Geoffroy's considerations, the effect for the cause.[3]

In 1836 he coined the term phocomelia.[4]

In July 1840, Geoffroy became blind, and some months later he had a paralytic attack. From that time his strength gradually failed him. He resigned his chair at the museum in 1841,[3] and was succeeded by his son, Isidore Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire. He died in 1844.

Geoffroy was a deist, which is to say that he believed in a God, but also in a law-like universe, with no supernatural interference in the details of existence. This kind of opinion was common in the Enlightenment, and goes with a rejection of revelation and miracles, and does not interpret the Bible as the literal word of God. These views did not conflict with his naturalistic ideas about organic change.

Geoffroy's theory was not a theory of common descent, but a working-out of existing potential in a given type. For him, the environment causes a direct induction of organic change. This opinion Ernst Mayr labels as 'Geoffroyism'.[5] It is definitely not what Lamarck believed (for Lamarck, a change in habits is what changes the animal). The direct effect of environment on heritable traits is not believed today to be a central evolutionary force; even Lawrence knew by 1816 that the climate does not directly cause the major differences between human races.

Geoffroy endorsed a theory of saltational evolution that "monstrosities could become the founding fathers (or mothers) of new species by instantaneous transition from one form to the next."[6] In 1831 he speculated that birds could have arisen from reptiles by an epigenetic saltation.[7] Geoffroy wrote that environmental pressures could produce sudden transformations to establish new species instantaneously.[8] In 1864 Albert von Kölliker revived Geoffroy's theory that evolution proceeds by large steps, under the name of heterogenesis.[9]

Geoffroy noted that the organization of dorsal and ventral structures in arthropods is opposite that of mammals. The inversion hypothesis was met with criticism and was rejected, however, some modern molecular embryologists have since resurrected this idea.[10]

The Geoffroy's cat (Leopardus geoffroyi) was named in his honour.[11]

Étienne Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire is commemorated in the scientific names of two species of South American turtle, Phrynops geoffroanus and Phrynops hilarii.[12]

His name is also honoured in that of a number of other species, including Geoffroy's spider monkey,[13] Geoffroy's bat, and Geoffroy's tamarin.

Rue Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire is a street in the 5ème arrondissement, Paris near the Jardin des Plantes and Muséum national d'histoire naturelle.

French author Honoré de Balzac dedicated his novel Le Père Goriot to Saint-Hilaire, "as a tribute of admiration for his labors and his genius."

• Cuvier–Geoffroy debate

•  This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, Étienne". Encyclopædia Britannica. 11 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 618–619.

• Charon, Pierre (2004). "Etienne Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire (1772-1844) and anencephaly: Contribution of one naturalist to medical knowledge". Histoire des sciences médicales. 38 (3): 365–383. PMID 15617200.
• Collins Cook, D. (2001). "Neglected ancestors: Etienne and Isidore Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire". Paleopathology Newsletter (116): 17–21. PMID 14628830.
• Morin, A. (1996). "[Teratology from Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire to the present]". Bulletin de l'Association des anatomistes (published Mar 1996). 80 (248): 17–31. PMID 9004867.
• Moyal, Ann (June 2009). "The great French naturalist and the platypus" (PDF). The National Library Magazine. 1 (2): 2–7. Retrieved 17 January 2011.
• Shampo, M.A.; Kyle, R.A. (1988). "Augusto de Saint-Hilaire: French entomologist and botanist". Mayo Clin. Proc. (published Aug 1988). 63 (8): 836. doi:10.1016/s0025-6196(12)62368-4. PMID 3294526.
• Brignon, Arnaud (2013). "Étienne Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire's unfinished study on fossil crocodiles (Thalattosuchia) from Normandy in light of unrecorded documents". Annales de Paléontologie. 99 (3): 169–205. doi:10.1016/j.annpal.2013.02.001.
• Brignon, Arnaud (2014). "The original drawings of Etienne Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire's Histoire des crocodiliens renfermes dans le terrain oolithique". Comptes Rendus Palevol. 13 (7): 637–645. doi:10.1016/j.crpv.2014.04.006.

• Works by or about Étienne Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire at Internet Archive
• Étienne Geoffroy Saint Hilaire Collection, American Philosophical Society
• van den Biggelaar, J.A.M.; Edsinger-Gonzales, E.; Schram, F.R. (2002). "The improbability of dorso-ventral axis inversion during animal evolution, as presumed by Geoffroy Saint Hilaire". Contributions to Zoology 71(1/3). HTM

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Étienne Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire.