1/4 + 1/16 + 1/64 + 1/256 + ⋯

In mathematics, the infinite series 1/4 + 1/16 + 1/64 + 1/256 + ⋯ is an example of one of the first infinite series to be summed in the history of mathematics; it was used by Archimedes circa 250–200 BC.[1] As it is a geometric series with first term 1/4 and common ratio 1/4, its sum is

Archimedes' figure with a = 3/4

Visual demonstrations

3s = 1.

The series 1/4 + 1/16 + 1/64 + 1/256 + ⋯ lends itself to some particularly simple visual demonstrations because a square and a triangle both divide into four similar pieces, each of which contains 1/4 the area of the original.

In the figure on the left,[2][3] if the large square is taken to have area 1, then the largest black square has area 1/2 × 1/2 = 1/4. Likewise, the second largest black square has area 1/16, and the third largest black square has area 1/64. The area taken up by all of the black squares together is therefore 1/4 + 1/16 + 1/64 + ⋯, and this is also the area taken up by the gray squares and the white squares. Since these three areas cover the unit square, the figure demonstrates that

Archimedes' own illustration, adapted at top,[4] was slightly different, being closer to the equation

3s = 1 again

See below for details on Archimedes' interpretation.

The same geometric strategy also works for triangles, as in the figure on the right:[2][5][6] if the large triangle has area 1, then the largest black triangle has area 1/4, and so on. The figure as a whole has a self-similarity between the large triangle and its upper sub-triangle. A related construction making the figure similar to all three of its corner pieces produces the Sierpiński triangle.[7]

Proof by Archimedes

This curve is a parabola. The dots on the secant line AE are equally spaced. Archimedes showed that the sum of the areas of triangles ABC and CDE is 1/4 of the area of triangle ACE. He then constructs another layer of four triangles atop those, the sum of whose areas is 1/4 of the sum of the areas of ABC and CDE, and then another layer of eight triangles atop that, having 1/4 of that area, and so on. He concluded that the area between the secant line and the curve is 4/3 the area of triangle ACE.

Archimedes encounters the series in his work Quadrature of the Parabola. He is finding the area inside a parabola by the method of exhaustion, and he gets a series of triangles; each stage of the construction adds an area 1/4 times the area of the previous stage. His desired result is that the total area is 4/3 times the area of the first stage. To get there, he takes a break from parabolas to introduce an algebraic lemma:

Proposition 23. Given a series of areas A, B, C, D, … , Z, of which A is the greatest, and each is equal to four times the next in order, then[8]

Archimedes proves the proposition by first calculating

On the other hand,

Subtracting this equation from the previous equation yields

and adding A to both sides gives the desired result.[9]

Today, a more standard phrasing of Archimedes' proposition is that the partial sums of the series 1 + 1/4 + 1/16 + ⋯ are:

This form can be proved by multiplying both sides by 1  1/4 and observing that all but the first and the last of the terms on the left-hand side of the equation cancel in pairs. The same strategy works for any finite geometric series.

The limit

Archimedes' Proposition 24 applies the finite (but indeterminate) sum in Proposition 23 to the area inside a parabola by a double reductio ad absurdum. He does not quite[10] take the limit of the above partial sums, but in modern calculus this step is easy enough:

Since the sum of an infinite series is defined as the limit of its partial sums,

Notes

  1. Shawyer and Watson p. 3.
  2. Nelsen and Alsina p. 74.
  3. Ajose and Nelson. p. 230
  4. Heath p. 250
  5. Stein p. 46.
  6. Mabry. p. 63
  7. Nelson and Alsina p. 56
  8. This is a quotation from Heath's English translation (p. 249).
  9. This presentation is a shortened version of Heath p. 250.
  10. Modern authors differ on how appropriate it is to say that Archimedes summed the infinite series. For example, Shawyer and Watson (p. 3) simply say he did; Swain and Dence say that "Archimedes applied an indirect limiting process"; and Stein (p. 45) stops short with the finite sums.

References

  • Ajose, Sunday and Roger Nelsen (June 1994). "Proof without Words: Geometric Series". Mathematics Magazine. 67 (3): 230. doi:10.2307/2690617. JSTOR 2690617.
  • Heath, T. L. (1953) [1897]. The Works of Archimedes. Cambridge UP. Page images at Casselman, Bill. "Archimedes' quadrature of the parabola". Retrieved 2007-03-22. HTML with figures and commentary at Otero, Daniel E. (2002). "Archimedes of Syracuse". Archived from the original on 7 March 2007. Retrieved 2007-03-22.
  • Mabry, Rick (February 1999). "Proof without Words: + + + ⋯ = ". Mathematics Magazine. 72 (1): 63. doi:10.1080/0025570X.1999.11996702. JSTOR 2691318.
  • Nelsen, Roger B.; Alsina, Claudi (2006). Math Made Visual: Creating Images for Understanding Mathematics. MAA. ISBN 0-88385-746-4.
  • Shawyer, Bruce; Watson, Bruce (1994). Borel's Methods of Summability: Theory and Applications. Oxford UP. ISBN 0-19-853585-6.
  • Stein, Sherman K. (1999). Archimedes: What Did He Do Besides Cry Eureka?. MAA. ISBN 0-88385-718-9.
  • Swain, Gordon; Dence, Thomas (April 1998). "Archimedes' Quadrature of the Parabola Revisited". Mathematics Magazine. 71 (2): 123–30. doi:10.2307/2691014. JSTOR 2691014.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.