1803 Gatton by-election

The 1803 Gatton by-election was a by-election to the House of Commons of the United Kingdom that took place on 24 January 1803.

Gatton by-election
24 January 1803
     
Candidate Philip Dundas Joseph Clayton Jennings
Party Tory
Popular vote 1 0
Percentage 100 0
MP before election

James Dashwood
Tory

 Subsequent MP

Philip Dundas
Tory

The parliamentary borough of Gatton was a notorious "rotten" or pocket borough "in the pocket" of the Lord of the Manor of Gatton, who at that time was Sir Mark Wood. It had, at most, seven voters - all tenants of Wood. At the 1802 general election, "Wood returned himself and his brother-in-law [James] Dashwood". Both were members of William Pitt the Younger's faction of the Tory Party. At Pitt's request, shortly after the election, Dashwood vacated his seat so as to make way for Philip Dundas.[1]

Result

Dundas was to be elected in a simple formality, returned uncontested. This was complicated, however, when "Joseph Clayton Jennings, a barrister and reformer, arrived on the scene", making it unexpectedly a contested election, and found a person who claimed to be entitled to vote in his favour. A voter was therefore also brought in for Dundas. Dashwood, acting as the returning officer, rejected the ballot for Jennings, and Dundas was duly elected with one vote.[1][2][3]

Dundas left for India two years later, causing another by-election, wherein Wood procured the seat for William Garrow - another reformist barrister, who won it uncontested and thereby made his entry in Parliament.[1]

By-Election 1803: Gatton
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Tory Philip Dundas 1 100 N/A
Unclear Joseph Clayton Jennings 0 0 N/A
Majority 1 100 N/A
Turnout 1[lower-alpha 1] 14 N/A
Tory hold Swing

1802 result
General election 1802: Gatton
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Tory Sir Mark Wood Unopposed
Tory James Dashwood Unopposed

References
  1. "Gatton: Borough Constituency", The History of Parliament, 1986
  2. William Godwin's Diary: Editorial note
  3. "Dashwood, James", The History of Parliament
  1. The likely number of total possible electors was 7, however this is unclear.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.