Anastasoff v. United States

Anastasoff v. United States, 223 F.3d 898 (8th Cir. 2000),[1] was a case decided by the U.S. Eighth Circuit on appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. It is notable for being the only case to consider the "Anastasoff issue", that is whether Article Three of the United States Constitution requires a federal court to treat unpublished opinions as precedent.[2]

Anastasoff v. United States
CourtUnited States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Full case nameFaye Anastasoff v. United States
DecidedAugust 22, 2000
Citation(s)223 F.3d 898 (8th Cir. 2000)
Case history
Prior action(s)Judge Catherine D. Perry, E.D. Mo., ruled in favor of the IRS.
Subsequent action(s)Vacated as moot on rehearing en banc, 235 F.3d 1054 (8th Cir. 2000)
Court membership
Judge(s) sittingRichard S. Arnold, Gerald Heaney, Paul A. Magnuson (D. Minn.)
Laws applied
Article Three of the United States Constitution

The case was subsequently vacated as moot on rehearing en banc,[3] due to the government's decision to pay the taxpayer's claim in full with interest at the statutory rate. In the final decision, the court opinion stated:

The controversy over the status of unpublished opinions is, to be sure, of great interest and importance, but this sort of factor will not save a case from becoming moot. We sit to decide cases, not issues, and whether unpublished opinions have precedential effect no longer has any relevance for the decision of this tax-refund case.

Before being overturned, the Anastasoff decision was cited by multiple courts that used unpublished opinions in their decisions, such as United States v. Goldman, No. 00-1276 of September 29, 2000, and United States v. Langmade, No. 00-2019 of December 29, 2000.[4]

See also

References
  1. Anastasoff v. United States, 223 F.3d 898 (8th Cir. 2000).
  2. Schiltz, Patrick J., The Citation of Unpublished Opinions in the Federal Courts of Appeals (PDF), archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-05-10
  3. Anastasoff v. United States, 235 F.3d 1054 (8th Cir. 2000).
  4. Whitney, Mark (2004), Losing Cite: The Anastasoff Rule, TheLaw.net Corporation
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.