Anti-Japan Tribalism

Described as "anti-Japan tribalism," the book posits that there is a shamanistic mentality in a small minority of South Korean people who regard Japan as their primary enemy. Such a mentality, the authors argue, gave rise to some anti-Japan arguments among some South Koreans. In the book’s prologue titled "A Country of Lies," Lee Young-hoon speaks critically of the people who lie, the politics which lie, the scholarship of lies, and the trials of lies. According to this book, the lies are particularly noticeable in some instances of the ROK's national history. Lee and the co-authors thus elucidate how a minority of people in their country has created a small number of forged historical accounts.

Essentially, the book argues that the official history of the ROK has never been empirical. Anti-Japanism has been a dogma for a minority in post-independence South Korea. As such, some anti-Japan forgeries were produced to dramatize the ROK's national history. Critical of such falsification, the book argues that some South Korean scholars, journalists, novelists, artists, activists, and politicians all contributed to this process.

Anti-Japan Tribalism is an attempt by some South Korean scholars to argue that there is a distorted historical narrative in their own country. Based on their opinion, the authors discuss some anti-Japan arguments. The book "has a potential to dismantle the ROK's official history, the one that has been taught as right."[3]

As discussed by Lee Woo-yeon, the book’s co-author and researcher at the Naksungdae Institute of Economic Research, Japan’s better wages and employment opportunities attracted 100,000 to 200,000 Korean workers each year through the 1930s and the early 1940s. Moreover, there was little wage discrimination during the war, when Japanese companies were in need of Korean workers.

The table of contents of this book, in Japanese edition,[4] is as following:

Preface to the Japanese Edition

Preface

Prologue: A Nation of Lies

Part 1: Memory of Tribalism

1. Absurd Arirang

2. A pistol in one hand, a surveying instrument in another hand

3. Did you say they plundered the land?

4. The approach of Japanese colonial administration

5. Myth of “the forced mobilization”

6. Was it really “forced labor” and “slave labor”?

7. Fictiveness of the wage discrimination against Koreans

8. Who are they, special army volunteers?

9. Originally, there was nothing to claim: The truth about the claim agreement

10. Stupid and shameless intrepid opposition against Korea-Japan talks

Part 2: Symbol and Fantasy of Tribalism

11. Inside facts of the myth surrounding Mt. Paektu

12. Dok-do, the supreme symbol of anti-Japan tribalism

13. The truth about the iron stakes myth

14. Dismantling of the former governor-general’s office building: Deleting the ROK's history

15. Fraudulent drama called the liquidation of pro-Japanese vestiges

16. A never ending story: "Compensation! Compensation! Compensation!"

17. Theology of anti-Japan tribalism

Part 3: Comfort Women, a Bastion of Tribalism

18. Comfort women within us

19. Establishment and culture of the registered prostitute system

20. The truth about the issue of Japanese military’s comfort women

21. In more than 40 years after the liberation, the issue of comfort women has not existed

22. Until the day when the Korea-Japan relations fail

Epilogue: Retribution of the Anti-Japan Tribalism

Commentary: A Patriotism Interrogated by "Anti-Japan Tribalism"

A confidant of President Moon Jae-in and a short-lived Minister of Justice, Cho Kuk criticized, "This book denies anti-humanist actions conducted by Imperial Japan during the World War II, such as wartime forced labor and sexual slavery," and called it "disgusting" in a Facebook post.[5] Lee Young-hoon responded to Cho's criticism, "it is nasty propaganda that is not worth mentioning." He also said, "I don't think Cho really read my book. He should criticize the book after analyzing its logic and reasoning."[6]

Hong Jun-pyo mentioned on his Facebook, "I think this book is inconsistent with our common sense about the Japan's cadastral surveys, installation of iron stakes, wartime forced labor, and comfort women issues. It seems to be consistent with historical views to support Japanese ruling in Korean Peninsula."[7]

Professors from various South Korean universities co-authored a comprehensive critique on the book, titled Japanese Imperialist Tribalism and published in October 2019.[8]

Yuji Hosaka published a critique on the book in April 2020, arguing that the authors are "New Pro-Japanese Collaborators" (신친일파).[9]

• Chinilpa
• Japan–Korea disputes
• Special law to redeem pro-Japanese collaborators' property
• O Sonfa

• Rhee Syngman TV's channel on YouTube (in Korean)