Case of Amarildo de Souza

According to initial police reports, de Souza was released after questioning. De Souza was classified as “missing” for more than two months after his disappearance, but public outrage eventually grew to force authorities to respond to the suspicious circumstances of his disappearance.[7] By October 2013, twenty-four policemen and UPP commander Edson Santos were accused of torture, concealing a body, procedural fraud, and conspiracy.[8] Four officers had a direct role in de Souza's disappearance and subsequent torture, twelve stood guard, and eight were present but failed to help the victim.[8] Major Santos was found to have bribed a Rocinha resident, Lucia Helena da Silva Batista, to lie in her eyewitness testimony of what happened to de Souza, linking the murder to a local drug trafficker rather than the military police.[6][9] To date, de Souza's body has not been found.[4] It was determined that de Souza was tortured with electric shocks and suffocated with plastic bags for more than two hours before he was drowned in a bucket.[10]

In June 2015, it was announced that investigations into de Souza's disappearance in response to new images from security cameras close to the UPP station in Rocinha. The goal of the reopened investigation is to determine why BOPE (Batalhão de Operações Policiais Especiais, a special unit of the military police trained extensively in urban warfare to combat drug gangs) entered Rocinha on the night of de Souza's disappearance.[4][11] While initial analysis of the images obtained of the BOPE trucks was inconclusive, computer enhanced imaging determined that a volume compatible with that of a human corpse was sealed in a motorcycle cover and placed in one of the BOPE trucks.[4] It was determined that de Souza was tortured with electric shocks and suffocated with plastic bags for more than two hours before he was drowned in a bucket.[10]

In the city of Rio, roughly 16% of all registered homicides between 2010 and 2015 took place by the hands of on-duty police officers. As of April 2015, 183 of 220 investigations into police killings were still open, and only one case led to the indictment of a police officer.[12] In this context, de Souza's case became a symbol of the fight against police abuse. “Where is Amarildo?” served as the rallying call of protesters, with #WhereIsAmarildo and #OndeEstaoAmarildo used extensively on social media.[7]

De Souza's case is controversial in that twenty-five UPP officers were charged with torture followed by death.[4] The UPPs were first established in 2008 in Santa Marta as a method to increase security in anticipation of the 2014 World Cup and 2016 Olympic Games. They were created to wrest control of the favelas from gangs and militias back to the Brazilian government, effectively integrating favela residents into the formal city [13]

The design of the UPPs addresses the issue of rampant police brutality and corruption in Rio by using only fresh recruits recently graduated from police academy and giving special training in human rights issues. However, despite the successful pacification of favelas with UPPs installed, the relationship between favela residents and UPPs is often marked by mutual distrust. In one study, interviewed favela residents reported concern over the possibility that the UPPs would become the “new boss” of the favela, replacing the ousted gang leaders and controlling the favelas without integrating them into the city as promised by the government.[13]

Among the criticisms of the UPPs is the allegation that they possibly have a role in the rising number of missing persons in pacified favelas,[14] a concern highlighted by de Souza's disappearance in 2013. The number of homicides per 100,000 people in Rio fell from 6122 in 2007 to 4030 in 2012, and the rate of resistance killings by police decreased by 51.5% in pacified favelas. At the same time, the number of missing persons in Rio's pacified favelas and its impoverished peripheral communities increased by 33 percent since 2007, one year before the creation of the UPPs.[13][15] Proponents of the UPPs argue that the rise in non-lethal crimes [13] – including unsolved disappearances – is a consequence of better reporting: it is possible that disappearances that occurred prior to pacification went unreported due to fear of revenge by gang members.[14]

On the other hand, critics of the program argue that Rio's police forces have an interest in not reporting “resistance killings,” defined by Amnesty International as “killings by on-duty police which are legitimized on the grounds of self-defense”.[12][16] Because the state gives monetary bonuses to UPPs for killing fewer people in an effort to reverse the culture of violence prevalent in Rio's police forces, it is possible that police dispose of evidence related to resistance killings before an official investigation can occur.[14] Between 2005 and 2014, 8,466 cases of killings by police were recorded in the state of Rio de Janeiro. While this overall rate began to fall in 2010, there was a 39.4 percent increase in resistance killings in Rio de Janeiro state between 2013 and 2014.[12] As global scrutiny is placed on Brazil's social maladies and the state's response to them in anticipation of the 2016 Olympic Games, critics of the UPPs purport that police forces are disguising resistance killings as disappearances in order to improve public perception.[13][15]

• List of people who disappeared