Certificate (complexity)

In computational complexity theory, a certificate (also called a witness) is a string that certifies the answer to a computation, or certifies the membership of some string in a language. A certificate is often thought of as a solution path within a verification process, which is used to check whether a problem gives the answer "Yes" or "No".

In the decision tree model of computation, certificate complexity is the minimum number of the input variables of a decision tree that need to be assigned a value in order to definitely establish the value of the Boolean function .

Use in definitions

The notion of certificate is used to define semi-decidability:[1] L is semi-decidable iff there is a two-place predicate R ⊆ Σ∗ × Σ∗ such that R is computable, and such that for all x ∈ Σ∗:

   x ∈ L ⇔ there exists y such that R(x, y)

Certificates also give definitions for some complexity classes which can alternatively be characterised in terms of nondeterministic Turing machines. A language L is in NP if and only if there exists a polynomial p and a polynomial-time bounded Turing machine M such that every word x is in the language L precisely if there exists a certificate c of length at most p(|x|) such that M accepts the pair (x, c).[2] The class co-NP has a similar definition, except that there are certificates for the words not in the language.

The class NL has a certificate definition: a problem in the language has a certificate of polynomial length, which can be verified by a deterministic logarithmic-space bounded Turing machine that can read each bit of the certificate once only.[3]

Examples

The problem of determining, for a given graph G and number k, if the graph contains an independent set of size k is in NP. Given a pair (G, k) in the language, a certificate is a set of k vertices which are pairwise not adjacent (and hence are an independent set of size k).[4]

A more general example, for the problem of determining if a given Turing machine accepts an input in a certain number of steps, is as follows:

 L = {<<M>, x, w> | does <M> accept x in |w| steps?}
 Show L ∈ NP.
 verifier:
   gets string c = <M>, x, w such that |c| <= P(|w|)
   check if c is an accepting computation of M on x with at most |w| steps
   |c| <= O(|w|3)
   if we have a computation of a TM with k steps the total size of the computation string is k2
   Thus, <<M>, x, w> ∈ L ⇔ there exists c <= a|w|3 such that <<M>, x, w, c> ∈ V ∈ P

See also

References
  1. Cook, Stephen. "Computability and Noncomputability" (PDF). Retrieved 7 February 2013.
  2. Arora, Sanjeev; Barak, Boaz (2009). "Definition 2.1". Complexity Theory: A Modern Approach. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-42426-4.
  3. Arora, Sanjeev; Barak, Boaz (2009). "Definition 4.19". Complexity Theory: A Modern Approach. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-42426-4.
  4. Arora, Sanjeev; Barak, Boaz (2009). "Example 2.2". Complexity Theory: A Modern Approach. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-42426-4.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.