Country-centred design

Embedded in the Country-centred design methodology is the Indigenous experience of 'Country'. This has a particular and distinct meaning, which is different to the Western understanding of country (with a lowercase 'c'). Danièle Hromek, a spatial designer of Budawang/Yuin heritage from the New South Wales South Coast, explains this as follows:

In the Aboriginal sense of the word, Country relates to the nation or cultural group and land that they/we belong to, yearn for, find healing from and will return to. However, Country means much more than land, it is their/our place of origin in cultural, spiritual and literal terms. It includes not only land but also skies and waters.[1]

Country is a wholistic worldview that incorporates human, non-human and all the natural systems that connect them.

Developed intergenerationally and communally over many generations of Indigenous peoples, the Country-centred design methodology is 'owned' by Indigenous peoples, and embodied through Indigenous designers. It positions Country as the guide for design processes. It inherently includes the relationships between the various elements of Country, community, non-humans and people, and understands the connections and kinships between all that share space. The methodology is interpreted differently dependent on the spatial practitioner and their individual relationships to Country, culture and community. Hromek explains the methodology in her 2019 PhD,'The (Re)Indigenisation of Space: Weaving narratives of resistance to embed Nura [Country] in design':

Bringing together ideas of making, spatial practice and materiality, I inscribe here a brief process for privileging Country in the process of design. This is a process used and created by First Peoples over generations through their care and management of Country. Our ancestors developed generative iterative collaborative communal processes, from which base a design can be developed. Understanding Country as the lead author of design changes the dynamic and the practice of design as it recognises the local Country important to the design. Country, as that which holds all, is centred and privileged in the design.[2]

Contemporary Indigenous architects and designers in Australia have used the term 'Country Centred Design' to describe this methodology for many years.[2][3] More recently, the methodology has been disseminated within the Australian architecture and design communities through a range of publications and public discussions. Led by Indigenous architects, designers and scholars, these initiatives aim to increase knowledge among the larger community of built environment practitioners and to ensure that Indigenous knowledge and methodologies are embedded in the design of the Australian built environment.

In a 2018 article, Dillon Kombumerri, an architect of Yugembir heritage, described a process of design that is "very much country-centred, that talk[s] to the deep history of country."[4]

The concept is further explored in a discussion published in Architecture Australia between Kombumerri, Sarah Lynn Rees (a Palawa woman and architectural practitioner and advocate descending from the Plangermaireener people of north-east Tasmania) and Carroll Go-Sam (a Dyirrbal gumbilbara bama woman from Ravenshoe, North Queensland working as an architectural researcher and practitioner). Here Kombumerri describes Country-centred design in relation to traditional greetings and explains how it differs to human-centred design:

The traditional form of greeting is not saying "hello" – that's a human-centred approach. Traditional communication protocols are about sharing where you're from and who your mob is. The human-centred approach needs to shift to be Country centred. My advice to architects is to ground yourself within Country and community.[4][5]

The New South Wales Government Architect discussion paper, Designing with Country, builds on the earlier forum of the same name held in Sydney in 2018. It aims to provide a clear guide to support built environment practitioners to "respond to Aboriginal culture and heritage responsibly, appropriately and respectfully". It is part of a larger program of activity from the Government Architect to ensure that sensitive sites are respected, and to support strong Aboriginal culture in the Australian built environment. This document also articulates the contrast between Country-Centred Design and Human-Centred Design:

Prioritising people and their needs when designing is widely regarded as fundamental in contemporary design and planning. However, appreciating an Indigenous or Aboriginal worldview suggests that there are limitations imposed by an entirely human-centred approach to design. If people and their needs are at the 'centre' of design considerations, then the landscape and nature are reduced to second order priorities. If design and planning processes considered natural systems that include people, animals, resources and plants equally – similar to an Aboriginal world view – this could make a significant contribution to a more sustainable future world.[1]

In 2017 Anthony McKnight, Awabakal, Gumaroi, and Yuin scholar, published his thesis titled 'Singing up Country in academia: teacher education academics and preservice teachers' experience with Yuin Country',[6] in which he discusses Country intuitively having its own methodology – a relational methodology that is guided and inspired by Country'. McKnight also describes Country as 'decentr[ing] the human authorship privilege of overseer, creator, controller, implementer, and owner'.[7]

Country-centred design was the topic of the annual Monash University Whyte Lecture in 2020, given by Angie Abdilla and Pia Waugh.[8]

The methodology is also referred to as "Country centric design", "Country-led design", "privileging Country in design",[2] and "designing with Country".[1]

• Indigenous architecture