Drymiotis v Du Toit

Drymiotis v Du Toit[1] is an important case in the South African law of lease, heard on September 3, 1968. The applicant's attorneys were Schwartz & Goldblatt; the respondent's were Vermaas & Kie. HJ Preiss appeared for the applicant; JJ Strydom appeared for the respondent.

Drymiotis v Du Toit
CourtTransvaal Provincial Division
Full case nameDrymiotis v Du Toit
Decided3 January 1969 (1969-01-03)
Citation(s)1969 (1) SA 631 (T)
Court membership
Judge sittingMarais J
Case opinions
Decision byMarais J
Keywords
Mines, Minerals, Mineral lease

Facts

A contract was entered into between Simon Drymiotis and Johannes Frederick du Toit to enable the latter, for a fixed period, to produce and deliver andalusite at the Pietersburg Railway Station in bags, from two farms, these being the property of Drymiotis. The contract provided as follows:

The andalusite produced will be priced at R20 per ton delivered in the truck at the station in bags, being production costs. It is further agreed that the purchasing company be approached to pay to the said producing contractor, the respondent, R20 per ton on his share of the andalusite and the balance to be paid to the owner of the mineral (the applicant). Provided that the sale price is R30 or more F.O.B. per ton, minimum to be R30 per ton.

Argument

In an application for the ejectment of the respondent from the land, Drymiotis contended that the contract was void, as it had not been notarially executed in terms of section 3(1) of the General Law Amendment Act.[2]

Judgment

The court, after reserving judgment, held that the "contract" was essentially a "lease of rights to minerals in land" in terms of the section. Accordingly the contract was void for want of notarial attestation.

See also

References
  • Drymiotis v Du Toit 1969 (1) SA 631 (T).

Notes
  1. 1969 (1) SA 631 (T).
  2. 50 of 1956.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.