Hambly v. Trott

Hambly v Trott is a landmark[1] Court case in conversion and trover.

The defendant had appropriated some sheep, goats, pigs and cider from the plaintiff and then died. The plaintiff sought return of these items from the deceased estate.[2][3][4] The plaintiff was ultimately unsuccessful but Lord Mansfield and Justices Acton and Ashurst set out the rules by which a claim against an estate may be successful.[5] Mansfeild explained that while an action for trespass would fail as it was against the person not the property, an action for contract or for trover would succeed.[6]

The case was one of the founding cases for the maxim Actio personalis moritur cum persona.

References
  1. Charles Mitchell, Paul Mitchell, Landmark Cases in the Law of Restitution (Bloomsbury Publishing, 18 Apr. 2006) p168
  2. Hambly v. Trott(1776) 1 Cowper 371.
  3. Edward Coke, J. H. Thomas, John Farquhar Fraser The Reports of Sir Edward Coke: In Thirteen Parts [1826] (The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd., 2002). p73
  4. Charles Mitchell, Paul Mitchell, Landmark Cases in the Law of Restitution (Bloomsbury Publishing, 18 Apr. 2006) p168
  5. Charles Mitchell, Paul Mitchell, Landmark Cases in the Law of Restitution(Bloomsbury Publishing, 2006).
  6. Charles Mitchell, Paul Mitchell, Landmark Cases in the Law of Restitution (Bloomsbury Publishing, 2006) .
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.