Johannes van Santen

Before serving as Archbishop of Utrecht, van Santen served as a parish priest in Schiedam.

Two days after the consecration of William Vet as Bishop of Deventer on June 12, 1825, an event that enjoyed the approval of King William I of the Netherlands, the Chapter of Utrecht chose van Santen as bishop-elect. He was consecrated Archbishop of Utrecht in the cathedral of St. Gertrude in Utrecht on November 13, 1825.

In 1827, Archbishop van Santen attended a series of meetings with Monsignor Capaccini, the papal nuncio of the Roman Catholic Church, in an attempt to reconcile the two churches. C.B. Moss says: “The first conference was entirely occupied by compliments paid by Capaccini to the ‘Jansenists’ in general and to Archbishop van Santen in particular; he praised their steadfastness in a Protestant country, their firm adhesion to Rome, the stand they had made against lax casuistry, the carefulness and prudence of the archbishop.” [1]

During the second meeting, van Santen refused to sign the Formulary of Alexander VII that was presented by Capaccini, thus condemning five propositions purportedly contained in the Augustinus and affirming the authority of the pope. According to C.B. Moss, van Santen replied: “I know that the Five Propositions, as condemned, are not contained in that book; how can I, then, as an honest man and a Christian, sign a declaration which denies the fact? I must obey God and my conscience, even in the Pope and the whole Church are misinformed.” [2] Purportedly asking, “Is Catholic unity to be maintained by perjury?”,[3] van Santen is likened by many to Martin Luther, for their stands against the hierarchy of the Roman Catholic Church.

C.B. Moss concludes: “If [van Santen] had accepted the Formulary, and his two suffragans with him, their names would have been acclaimed throughout the Roman Catholic world…as the men who by their submission had healed the ‘Jansenist schism’; …And yet he would not, for any advantage in this world or the next, declare that to be true which he was quite sure was false. He knew that conscience has a more binding authority than either Pope or Church.” [4]

On March 4, 1853, Pius IX negotiated with the Dutch Government to establish a new hierarchy in the Netherlands, with a Roman Catholic archbishop in Utrecht and a bishop in Haarlem, but with no other sees or boundaries corresponding to the sees erected by the Roman Catholic Church in 1559. Van Santen, together with Bishop Henricus Johannes van Buul, issued a formal protest against the rival bishops in the sees they already occupied.

When Pius IX issued the papal bull “Ineffabilis Deus” on December 8, 1854, proclaiming the dogma of the Immaculate Conception of Mary, van Santen responded with formal protest. On September 14, 1856, he and his two suffragans, Bishop Henricus Johannes van Buul of Haarlem and Hermannus Heykamp of Deventer, penned a letter to Pius IX, protesting the new dogma on three grounds: that it was contrary to scripture and tradition, that the bishops of the Church had never been consulted about it, and that it was a novel, false doctrine. They appealed this doctrine to a future ecumenical council of the Church.

Moss, C.B. (1948). The Old Catholic Movement: Its Origins and History. Berkeley, CA: The Apocryphal Press. ISBN 9780976402596.