National Archives and Records Administration v. Favish
National Archives and Records Administration v. Favish et. al., 541 U.S. 157 (2004) is a United States Supreme Court ruling about the Freedom of Information Act concerning the release of photos surrounding the death of Vince Foster, then Deputy White House Counsel.[1] The court ruled unanimously that a family has the right to invoke an deceased individuals' right to privacy and the unwarranted invasion of privacy exception in the Act must have evidence of improper conduct to overturn the exception.[2]
National Archives and Records Administration v. Favish | |
---|---|
Argued December 3, 2003 Decided March 30, 2004 | |
Full case name | National Archives and Records Administration v. Allan J. Favish, et al. |
Docket no. | 02-954 |
Citations | 541 U.S. 157 (more) |
Case history | |
Prior | United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit |
Holding | |
(i) A family has the right to invoke an deceased individuals' right to privacy (ii) the unwarranted invasion of privacy exception in the FOIA must have evidence of improper conduct to overturn | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinion | |
Majority | Anthony Kennedy, joined by a unanimous court |
Laws applied | |
5 U.S.C. § 552 |
References
- "National Archives and Records Administration v. Favish". Oyez Project. Retrieved 2021-01-06.
- Bemis, Lauren (15 October 2005). "Balancing a Citizen's Right to Know with the Privacy of an Innocent Family: The Expansion of the Scope of Exemption 7(C) of the Freedom of Information Act under National Archives & Records". Freedom of Information Act under National Archives and Records Administration v Favish. 25: 507–543.
See also
- United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
- McCambridge v. Little Rock, 298 Ark. 219, 231–232, 766 S. W. 2d 909, 915 (1989)
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.