Paul Bakker

Paul Bakker is a professor in medieval and renaissance philosophy at Radboud University.[1] He is a controversial figure because an official university investigation from September 2020 concluded he was guilty of having committed 'inappropriate behaviour'.[2][3][4][5]

Paul Bakker
Born
Paulus Johannes Jacobus Maria Bakker

February 23 1966
NationalityDutch
CitizenshipThe Netherlands
OccupationUniversity professor
TitleProfessor
Academic background
Alma materRadboud University
ThesisLa raison et le miracle: les doctrines eucharistiques (1999)
Doctoral advisorH.A.G. Braakhuis, Z. Kaluza and M.J.F.M. Hoenen
Academic work
EraContemporary philosophy
DisciplineHistory of philosophy
Sub-disciplineMedieval and renaissance philosophy
InstitutionsRadboud University
Main interestsMedieval commentaries on Aristotle,
Natural philosophy,
Philosophy of mind

Academic research

Bakkers research is mainly focused on medieval commentaries on Aristotle's Physics and De Anima and the complex relations between philosophical and theological arguments presented therein. He has also published within the discipline of the philosophy of mind on topics such as 'the relation between body, soul, and mind, theories of the soul's faculties, and views of sense perception'.[1]

Controversy

Promotion to dean and investigation into social safety

On the first of July 2020, Bakker would have become the new dean of the faculty of philosophy, theology and religious studies at Radboud University.[6] He declined this promotion however, because it was revealed an investigation into social safety at the faculty would start, of which he would be the subject.[7][8] The results of this investigation, which were released on September 16th 2020, concluded he was guilty of having committed 'inappropriate behaviour'.[2][3][4][5]

Campus ban and unclarity

As a result of this conclusion, he got a campus ban for one semester and the faculty decided they were going to look for a different dean.[2][3][5] During this sanction, he kept his salary because his contract was not terminated.[9] The report of the investigation was not published, however, which lead to it being unclear what was meant with the term 'inappropriate behaviour'.[5][10] The university did not give any information that would specify this term, because the people involved supposedly did not want the public to know what had happened, according to the executive board of the university.[4][5]

Aftermath

As a consequence of this unclarity, students decided to write an open letter to the executive board, which was published in the Algemeen Nijmeegs Studentenblad.[11] In this letter they demanded more openness regarding the results of the investigation. They also questioned the idea that the people involved did not want the public to know what had happened.[12] Furthermore, they argued the situation should not be covered up and they urged the executive board to learn from the MeToo-movement.[11][12] A petition was also created to request more clarity regarding the results of the investigation.[13] The executive board responded in a written statement, declaring they did not want to release the requested information.[14] The faculty did however decide to start a follow-up investigation as well as a 'cultural program' to prevent possible incidents in the future.[15][16]

References

  1. "Prof. P.J.J.M. Bakker (Paul)". Radboud University. Archived from the original on December 10, 2020.
  2. "Onderzoek sociale veiligheid bij Faculteit der Filosofie, Theologie en Religiewetenschappen afgerond" (in Dutch). Radboud University. Archived from the original on September 20, 2020.
  3. Dros, Lodewijk (September 17, 2020). "'Ongepast handelen' nekt beoogd decaan Nijmegen" [‘Inappropriate behaviour’ necks the intended dean from Nijmegen] (in Dutch). de Trouw.
  4. "Na 'ongepast handelen': hoogleraar Radboud Universiteit weggestuurd" [After 'inappropriate behaviour', Radboud University professor was sent away] (in Dutch). Omroep Gelderland. September 16, 2020.
  5. Haverkamp, Annemarie (September 16, 2020). "Onderzoek afgerond: Paul Bakker wordt geen decaan en is voorlopig niet welkom op faculteit" [Investigation finished: Paul Bakker will not become dean and is not welcome at the faculty for the time being] (in Dutch). Vox magazine.
  6. "Paul Bakker decaan van de faculteit der Filosofie, Theologie en Religiewetenschappen" [Paul Bakker will become the dean of the faculty of philosophy, theology and religious studies]. Radboud University. Archived from the original on June 17, 2020.
  7. Haverkamp, Annemarie (June 24, 2020). "Onderzoek naar 'omgangsvormen' binnen faculteit FTR; Paul Bakker wordt geen decaan" [Investigation into ‘manners’ within the faculty of philosophy, theology and religious studies; Paul Bakker will not become dean] (in Dutch). Vox magazine.
  8. Hermans, Frank (June 24, 2020). "Streep door benoeming Radboud-decaan na vragen over 'sociale veiligheid en omgangsvormen'" [promotion of Radboud-dean crossed out after questions about ‘social safety and manners’] (in Dutch). de Gelderlander.
  9. Bodewes, Jochem (November 13, 2020). "Paul Bakker krijgt doorbetaald tijdens straf" [Paul Bakker keeps his salary during sanction] (in Dutch). Algemeen Nijmeegs Studentenblad.
  10. Bodewes, Jochem (September 22, 2020). "Studenten FTR hebben vraagtekens na blijk 'ongepast handelen'" [Students of the faculty of philosophy, theology and religious studies have questions concerning 'inappropriate behaviour'] (in Dutch). Algemeen Nijmeegs Studentenblad.
  11. Bodewes, Jochem (October 1, 2020). "Ingezonden: Boodschap aan college van bestuur: stop zaak-Paul Bakker niet in de doofpot" [Submitted letter: Message to the executive board: do not cover up the Paul Bakker-case] (in Dutch). Algemeen Nijmeegs Studentenblad. Archived from the original on October 1, 2020.
  12. Hermans, Frank (September 29, 2020). "Filosofiestudenten eisen openheid van Radboud Universiteit over ongepast handelen hoogleraar: 'Laat dit geen doofpot-affaire worden!'" [Philosophy students demand openness from Radboud University regarding inappropriate behaviour professor: ‘Lets not cover this up!’] (in Dutch). de Gelderlander.
  13. van Pelt, Stan (September 29, 2020). "Filosofiestudenten starten petitie voor meer openheid over 'ongepast handelen' hoogleraar" [Philosophy students start a petition for more openness regarding the ‘inappropriate behaviour’ of a professor] (in Dutch). Vox magazine.
  14. "Reactie RU op FTR-studenten: onderzoeksuitkomst wordt niet publiek" [Reaction Radboud University to students of the faculty of philosophy, theology and religious studies: the report of the investigation will not become public] (in Dutch). Algemeen Nijmeegs Studentenblad. September 23, 2020.
  15. Haverkamp, Annemarie (October 8, 2020). "Filosofiestudenten krijgen geen details over 'ongepast handelen', Paul Bakker moet 'vertrouwen terugwinnen'" [Philosophy students do not get details about ‘inappropriate behaviour’, Paul bakker has to ‘regain trust’] (in Dutch). Vox magazine.
  16. Bodewes, Jochem (November 10, 2020). "Meer aan de hand binnen FFTR: 29 extra meldingen van sociale onveiligheid" [More going on at FFTR: 29 new accounts of social unsafety] (in Dutch). Algemeen Nijmeegs Studentenblad.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.