Picuris Formation

The formation consists mostly of tuffaceous conglomerate and sandstone[3] with a thickness of more than 1,200 feet (370 m).[1]

The formation is divided into three informal members[1][3] These are a lower conglomerate member, a middle tuffaceous member, and an upper volcaniclastic member.[2] The lower member is a sandy or silty conglomerate containing mostly Hondo Group quartzite clasts ranging in size from 2 millimetres (0.079 in) to over 2 meters (6.6 ft) in diameter. The conglomerate is greenish to pale yellow in color poorly sorted, and moderately to well rounded. Ar-Ar geochronology indicates an age range from before 34.5 Ma to less than 28.3 Ma.[3]

The middle member is a tuffaceous fine to pebbly sandstone. This is buff to yellowish in color, generally poorly cemented, and poorly sorted. However, some beds are highly silicified. The member contains some well-developed fining upwards sequences a few to tens of centimeters thick. There are some interbeds and channel fills of conglomerate containing local Precambrian clasts, with more conglomerate towards the top. Some ash layers are bioturbated. Ash beds from the Amalia Tuff eruption have been identified within the member, with ages of 23 and 27 Ma, interpreted as pre- and post-caldera pumies.. This member is at least 150 meters (490 ft) thick. Based on Ar-Ar geochronology, this member was deposited from 28.3 to less than 23 Ma.[3]

The upper member is red to purple volcaniclastic conglomerate and sandstone, typically carbonate cemented. Individual bed contacts are abrupt and the lower bed is often scoured. A basalt clast from the base of the member has an age of 19.78 +/- 0.24 Ma, and the member as a whole spans the age range of less than 19.8 Ma to about 15 Ma. This member is overlain by the Dixon Member of the Tesuque Formation.[3]

Cabot included tuffaceous beds just north of Santa Fe in the Picuris Formation, but the correlation of this Bishop's Lodge Member remains controversial, with some geologists keeping it with the Picuris Fornmation,[4] others assigning it to the Tesuque Formation,[5] and others more recently assigning it to the Espinaso Formation.[6]

The formation is of unusual interest in that it spans the transition from Laramide crustal shortening to Rio Grande rift crustal extension.[2]

The formation was first named by E.C. Cabot in 1938, likely for exposures in the Picuris Mountains north of Vadito, New Mexico.[1]

• Aby, S.B.; Bauer, P.W.; Kelson, K.I. (2004). "The Picuris Formation: A late Eocene to Miocene sedimentary sequence in northern New Mexico" (PDF). New Mexico Geological Society Field Conference Series. 55: 335–350. Retrieved August 31, 2020.
• Baldwin, Brewster (1956). "The Santa Fe group of north-central New Mexico" (PDF). New Mexico Geological Society Field Conference Guidebook. 7: 115–121. Retrieved November 23, 2020.
• Bauer, P.W.; Kenson, K.I.; Aby, S. (2005). "Preliminary geologic map of the Penasco 7.5 minute quadrangle, Taos County, New Mexico" (PDF). New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources Open-File Geologic Map. OF-GM 62. Retrieved August 31, 2020.
• Cabot, Edward C. (January 1938). "Fault Border of the Sangre de Cristo Mountains North of Santa Fe, New Mexico". The Journal of Geology. 46 (1): 88–105. Bibcode:1938JG.....46...88C. doi:10.1086/624621. S2CID 128579201.
• Galusha, Ted; Blick, John C. (1971). "Stratigraphy of the Santa Fe Group, New Mexico" (PDF). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History. 144 (1). Retrieved May 13, 2020.
• Read, Adam S.; Rodgers, John B.; Ralser, Steven; Ilg, Brad R.; Kelley, Shari; Koning, Daniel J. (February 2013). "Geologic map of Seton Village Quadrangle, Santa Fe County, New Mexico" (PDF). New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources Open-file Geologic Map. OF-GM 023. Retrieved August 31, 2020.