Political myth

A political myth is an ideological narrative that is believed by social groups.

In 1975, Henry Tudor defined it in the book Political Myth. He said that myths are believed to be true even if they may be false, and they are devices with dramatic constructions used "in order to come to grips with reality". Political myths simply deal with political topics and always use a group of people as the hero or protagonist.[1] In 2001, Christopher G. Flood described a working definition of a political myth as "an ideologically marked narrative which purports to give a true account of a set of past, present, or predicted political events and which is accepted as valid in its essentials by a social group".[2]

Examples cited as political myths include Manifest Destiny,[3] The Clash of Civilizations,[4] and national myths.[5]

In 1946 Ernst Cassirer recounted political theory in his The Myth of the State.[6]

In 1973, T. L. Thorson wrote in the 4th edition of A History of Political Theory: "It is the mark of a modern mind to be able to explicitly create a 'myth' as a way of influencing others (as, for example, Plato does in The Republic). In its original sense myth is a literal description."[7]

Function

According to Tudor, what recasts myth as political in nature is its subject matter,[8]:17 that being politics. In order for a political narrative to be recast as myth, the narrative of events must be cast in dramatic form and it must serve a practical argument.[8]:16

Tudor defines dramatic form, stating "there is indeed a critical event by reference to which men can order their present experience but the events in question are thought of as taken place in the past."[8]:16 The function of political myth can be better understood when it is broken down into the following components: (1) myth provides the theoretical argument, which is incorporated into an (2) ideology that supports the myth by providing a practical argument.[8]:127

Every myth has its protagonist/heroic figure that represents a particular community destined to create a morally coherent world which orients the community's activities towards this end.[8]:138 Mythopoeic narratives in political discourse can range from origin stories (foundation myths) that recount the establishment of a community, to ascribing a political existence to a community based in the future (often a utopic vision), to restoring a political community that has ceased to exist.

Although, both myth and ideology carry certain values and beliefs, ideology provides a practical argument rooted in rendering the community's past experiences as coherent, allowing them to make sense of their present circumstances and often, as a result, providing communities with objectives for future activities. A myth is considered a political myth when the narrative provides an ideologically marked account of the past, present, and future of the political community.[9] By ideologically marked, the narrative carries "assumptions, values, and goals associated with a specific ideology… that conveys an implicit invitation to assent to a particular ideological standpoint."[9]

In short, political myths offer "an account of the past and the future in the light of which the present can be understood." [8]:139 A political myth's success is dependent on the practical argument being accepted as true.[8]:138

See also

Bibliography
  • Arvidsson, Stefan (2017). Style and mythology of socialism: socialist idealism, 1871-1914. Routledge
  • Bottici, Chiara (2007). A philosophy of political myth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Cassirer, Ernst (1946). The myth of the state. London: Oxford U.P.
  • Flood, Christopher (2002). Political myth: a theoretical introduction. [New ed.] New York: Routledge
  • Tudor, Henry (1972). Political myth. London: Macmillan

References
  1. Niemann, Yolanda Flores; Armitage, Susan; Hart, Patricia; et al., eds. (2002). Chicana leadership: the Frontiers reader. University of Nebraska Press. p. 52. ISBN 0-8032-8382-2. Henry Tudor's definition.
  2. Flood, Christopher (2001). Political Myth. Routledge. p. 44. ISBN 0-415-93632-2.
  3. Bass, J.D. & Cherwitz R.A. (1978). "Imperial mission and manifest destiny: A case study of political myth in rhetorical discourse". Southern Speech Communication Journal. Routledge. 43 (3): 213–32. doi:10.1080/10417947809372382.
  4. Chiara Bottici & Benoît Challand (August 2006). "Rethinking Political Myth; The Clash of Civilizations as a Self-Fulfilling Prophecy". European Journal of Social Theory. 9 (3): 315–36. doi:10.1177/1368431006065715. S2CID 143437428.
  5. David Archard (September 1995). "Myths, Lies and Historical Truth: a Defence of Nationalism". Political Studies. John Wiley & Sons. 43 (3): 472–81. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1995.tb00315.x. S2CID 145549681.
  6. Cassirer, Ernst (1946). The Myth of the State. Yale University Press. ISBN 0300000367.
  7. T.L. Thorson (1973) A History of Political Theory, 4th edition, page 14
  8. Tudor, Henry (1975). Political Myth. Praeger.
  9. Flood, Christopher (2002). Political Myth. Routledge. p. 42.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.