Sears–Haack body

The cross-sectional area of a Sears–Haack body is

${\displaystyle S(x)={\frac {16V}{3L\pi }}[4x(1-x)]^{3/2}=\pi R_{\text{max}}^{2}[4x(1-x)]^{3/2},}$

its volume is

${\displaystyle V={\frac {3\pi ^{2}}{16}}R_{\text{max}}^{2}L,}$

its radius is

${\displaystyle r(x)=R_{\text{max}}[4x(1-x)]^{3/4},}$

the derivative (slope) is

${\displaystyle r'(x)=3R_{\text{max}}[4x(1-x)]^{-1/4}(1-2x),}$

the second derivative is

${\displaystyle r''(x)=-3R_{\text{max}}\{[4x(1-x)]^{-5/4}(1-2x)^{2}+2[4x(1-x)]^{-1/4}\},}$

where:

• x is the ratio of the distance from the nose to the whole body length (this is always between 0 and 1),
• r is the local radius,
• ${\displaystyle R_{\text{max}}}$ is the radius at its maximum (occurs at center of the shape),
• V is the volume,
• L is the length.

From Slender-body theory, it follows that:

${\displaystyle D_{\text{wave}}=-{\frac {1}{4\pi }}\rho U^{2}\int _{0}^{\ell }\int _{0}^{\ell }S''(x_{1})S''(x_{2})\ln |x_{1}-x_{2}|\mathrm {d} x_{1}\mathrm {d} x_{2},}$

alternatively:

${\displaystyle D_{\text{wave}}=-{\frac {1}{2\pi }}\rho U^{2}\int _{0}^{\ell }S''(x)\mathrm {d} x\int _{0}^{x}S''(x_{1})\ln(x-x_{1})\mathrm {d} x_{1}.}$

These formulae may be combined to get the following:

${\displaystyle D_{\text{wave}}={\frac {64V^{2}}{\pi L^{4}}}\rho U^{2}={\frac {9\pi ^{3}R_{max}^{4}}{4L^{2}}}\rho U^{2},}$

${\displaystyle C_{D_{\text{wave}}}={\frac {24V}{L^{3}}}={\frac {9\pi ^{2}R_{max}^{2}}{2L^{2}}},}$

where:

• ${\displaystyle D_{\text{wave}}}$ is the wave drag,
• ${\displaystyle \rho }$ is the density of the fluid,
• U is the velocity.

The Sears–Haack body shape derivation is correct only in the limit of a slender body. The theory has been generalized to slender but non-axisymmetric shapes by Robert T. Jones in NACA Report 1284.[2] In this extension, the area ${\displaystyle S(x)}$ is defined on the Mach cone whose apex is at location ${\displaystyle x}$, rather than on the ${\displaystyle x={\text{constant}}}$ plane as assumed by Sears and Haack. Hence, Jones's theory makes it applicable to more complex shapes like entire supersonic aircraft.

A superficially related concept is the Whitcomb area rule, which states that wave drag due to volume in transonic flow depends primarily on the distribution of total cross-sectional area, and for low wave drag this distribution must be smooth. A common misconception is that the Sears–Haack body has the ideal area distribution according to the area rule, but this is not correct. The Prandtl–Glauert equation, which is the starting point in the Sears–Haack body shape derivation, is not valid in transonic flow, which is where the area rule applies.

• Prandtl–Glauert transformation
• Aerodynamics
• Anti-shock body
• Haack series nose cone
• Area rule

• Haack Minimum Drag Rifle Bullet Site down – https://web.archive.org/web/20160306044740/http://www.lima-wiederladetechnik.de/englisch/haack_minimum_drag_bullet.htm
• Geschoßformen kleinsten Wellenwiderstandes by W. Haack, Bericht 139 der Lilienthal-Gesellschaft (1941)
• Sears–Haack body calculator