T. A. Rottanzi

Rottanzi made an unsuccessful bid for the board of directors of the San Francisco city school system in 1894.[14]

In June 1895, he was elected president of the newly formed South Side Improvement Association, which had as its goals "better and cleaner streets," the conversion of Folsom Street into a boulevard and rerouting of the city's annual Fourth of July parade through the South Side.[15] Meetings were held in his home at 301 Third Street.[5][16]

Rottanzi was a member of Pacific Parlor, Native Sons of the Golden West.[13] In 1897 he made news by resigning as lead baritone in St. Mary's Church when he became "aggrieved at what he considers an affront from the Paulist Fathers" in a letter sent to Supervisor J.E. Britt. In it, M. Otis complained on behalf of the order about Rottanzi's opposition to "law and morality" as a member of the Board of Supervisors. "Long have I sung free gratis for that church," Rottanzi said, "but never again shall my voice make its walls ring."[17]

Rottanzi was elected supervisor of the 7th Ward in 1896. In his required public report of expenses he swore that he had spent $116.35 on the campaign: $72 to the Democratic Purity Committee, $14 for printing, $7.75 for painting signs, $2.60 for cloth, $5 for a banner, and $15 for signs.[18] He took office in January 1897 and won his position as head of the finance committee in a caucus of the Democratic supervisors.[19]

In September 1897 Mayor James D. Phelan engineered what was called a coup d'etat in persuading Governor James Budd, a fellow Democrat, to replace the serving Board of Supervisors with all new, Democratic members, except for Rottanzi, who was nevertheless shifted from the 7th to the 10th Ward. Upon learning that he would retain his board membership, Rottanzi "lost interest" in appealing the governor's decision to the courts and "was as cheerful as a clam at high tide yesterday, and last evening delighted his associates in the meeting of the committee of the whole with his bubbling good humor."[20]

His good humor, however, dampened when he learned that Mayor Phelan had named him to the supervisors' Health and Public Safety Committee, where he refused to serve. It was said "in official circles" that Phelan had become jealous of Rottanzi and "jumped at the chance to put him on the bone heap of an obscure committee."[21]

In one of the first meetings of the new board, in September 1897, Rottanzi offered a motion that it be the "sense of this Board that none of the present employes of the city government be removed except for cause." He said that as the new Board was known to be a reform body, he thought it would be "the proper thing" to declare in favor of civil service. His motion was defeated, 7 to 4.[22]

The next month, however, a State Supreme Court decision ended the reign of the new board and the former supervisors, including Rottanzi, were returned to their seats.[23]

In March 1897 Rottanzi introduced an ordinance designed to ban "unduly large hats" worn by people attending the city's theaters.[24] The proposed ordinance, which because of its nature affected only women, stated that:

No person shall wear any hat or bonnet or other head covering within any licensed theater . . . during the rendition of any programme on the stage or platform . . ., but every such hat, bonnet or other head covering shall be removed from the head by the person wearing the same during the time of performance . . .; provided, however, that the above inhibition shall not be held to include skullcaps, lace coverings or other small or closely fitting headdress or covering which does not interfere with or obstruct the view of the stage or platform.[25]

Alfred Bouvier of the Baldwin and California theaters, who was "said to be the prime mover in the high hat agitation in this country," favored the proposal, saying that "we have many, many complaints from people inconvenienced by immense headgear," but noting that "The women have acceded very gracefully to the general request and have removed large hats." S.H. Friedlander of the Columbia Theater, however, "looked upon the Rottanzi order as an unwarranted invasion of privacy and said he, for one, would never aid voluntarily in its enforcement." "I don't think men know enough about such things to legislate on them," he said. ". . . a lady knows best when she looks well."[24]

Rottanzi's proposal was roundly criticized by the supervisors' Finance Committee, which stated in its report:

It is an interference with personal rights and is not in the category of a police or sanitary regulation. . . . Only to fancy that a lady unconscious of any objections to her head covering should, after the performance, be placed under arrest by an officer, because, unfortunately, she sat in front of an irascible individual whose stature, physical or mental, made her presence objectionable, even with a duck of a bonnet, then to be required to be escorted to the police station . . . What crusty old or young bachelor devised this attack upon the ladies?[26]

On March 22, 1897, the supervisors defeated the ordinance, 9 to 3,[27] but after a delay of two weeks,[28] it was passed unanimously.[29]

In June 1897 the Board of Supervisors appointed Rottanzi to the position of acting mayor during a short absence of James D. Phelan, and as such the councilman concerned himself with waste and indolence in city government. The day he was appointed, "he took a stroll about the City Hall, visiting a number of offices for the purpose of ascertaining whether the officials and employes were performing their duties."[30] His report on conditions in the health department and the city recorder's office was mocked by fellow Supervisor C.A. Clinton, who said that "the farce of playing Mayor by the Supervisor from the Seventh ward has lasted long enough. He has, in the few days he acted for the Mayor, made himself ridiculous . . . the laughing stock of the community." Rottanzi replied that Clinton was "burning up with jealousy."[31]

As acting mayor, he also discovered that the city's Board of Health had been collecting fees from the public under cover of an ordinance which had been passed by the previous city council but was vetoed by Mayor Phelan, whose veto was sustained by the new council.[32]

As the supervisors' finance committee chair, Rottanzi believed that the city's Insanity Commission was becoming an "expensive luxury" and at one point he refused to pay the bills submitted by the commissioners and insisted on finding out "how many of the persons brought before the commission were simply 'drunks' or simple-minded persons found in the city jails or picked up by policemen upon the streets." He urged that two physicians be appointed to do the job of the commissioners to save money for the city.[33]

He was opposed to public begging, and in a letter addressed to Police Chief Mills said that people selling pencils "simply made a bunch of pencils an excuse to intrude on pedestrians and the occupants of offices, to their great inconvenience and the discomfort of the public."[34]

Rottanzi urged the incineration of the old county hospital buildings when a new hospital structure was completed, saying that such a "conflagration would destroy all the disease germs." He said Fire Chief Sullivan agreed with the idea.[35]

In March 1902, Mayor James D. Phelan ousted the entire Board of Health because it had been promulgating a campaign against bubonic fever, including what the mayor called "The roping and the farcical fencing in of Chinatown," and he appointed a new board, including Rottanzi.

In 1907, Rottanzi was an official San Francisco city physician.[36]