3DISCO

The biological samples (tissues) are heterogeneous structures consist of compounds which differ in their refractive indexes. For example, water have RI 1.33, lipids and proteins around 1.40 – 1.45.[19] As result the light is scattered on its path through the tissue, which leads to decrease in resolution or even to disappearance of signal in samples thicker than a few tens of micrometers. Series of steps including dehydration and delipidation of tissue and its subsequent incubation and imaging in medium with RI similar to imaged structures therefore decrease the scattering of light and leads to transparent sample.[20][21]

After fixation with (usually with paraformaldehyde) and eventually labeling with dyes, the samples are dehydrated via incubation in solutions with growing concentration (50%, 70%, 80% and 100% in water) of tetrahydrofurane (THF). Because its lack of reactive alcohol, aldehyde or ketone groups, THF is less reactive and preserve fluorescence better than other dehydrating solutions.[21][18] After dehydration the sample is rinsed first in dichlormethane (DCM) and finally in dibenzyl ether (DBE) to match the refractive index of tissue and surrounding medium leading to transparent sample. In DBE samples are stored and imaged as well.[1]

3DISCO protocol is best suited for fixed tissues labeled with strong fluorophores, ideally transgenic models expressing fluorescent proteins such as GFP (alternatively staining with synthetic dyes is possible as well).[21] For antibody labeling the 3DISCO method was optimized and published under name iDISCO (see below Modifications and applications).[10]

Whole process is relatively easy to perform and require just changes of given solutions with no need for some customized laboratory equipment. Process of clearing and subsequent imaging is fast (hours to days depending on sample size), especially in comparison with physical sectioning of whole organ, imaging of their parts and reconstruction before subsequent image analysis (that could easily take several weeks).[1][21] Above that 3DISCO works on many types of tissues (lung, spleen, lymph nodes, mammary gland, tumors).[1][10]

Main drawbacks of this method are partial delipidation of tissue during clearing discriminating use of lipophilic dyes, shrinkage of tissue during clearing,[21] partial degradation of fluorescence,[22] complete degradation of fluorescence during long term storage[1] and toxicity of used reagents (and their potential to damage the microscopy objectives if leak from imaging chamber).[23]

3DISCO method was soon after publication adopted by other researchers and modified with aim to specific goals, like use of retrograde[24][25] or antibody labeling (iDISCO),[10] clearing whole body of mouse (uDISCO)[3] or clearing of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples (DIPCO).[8]

Authors of iDISCO (stands for “immunolabeling-enabled imaging of solvent-cleared organs“) included pretreatment of sample with methanol, hydrogen peroxide, detergents and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) together with antibody labeling before clearing. This preprocess overcome two drawbacks of antibody labeling of large samples. First lowering the autofluorescence of samples and enhance signal-to-noise ratio, and second make tissue more penetrable for antibodies. As result samples as large as mouse embryos or whole mouse organs can be successfully dyed with fluorescent labeled antibodies and thereafter cleared and imaged.[10]

Authors of uDISCO (from “ultimate imaging of solvent-cleared organs“) enhance a shrinkage of tissue, a common bystander effect of dehydration of sample in first step of clearing. They used tert-butanol instead of THF for dehydration and also different solution for imaging, which preserve fluorescence better than DBE. Thank to shrinkage of the tissue, they can observe large samples up to size of whole mouse body.[3] It is worth to mention that uDISCO was highlighted by media worldwide including New York Times,[26] Wall Street Journal,[27] Business Insider,[28] Nature and Science[29] magazines. It was also chosen as one of the top 10 scientific images of 2016 by Nature.[30]

DIPCO (from “diagnosing immunolabelled paraffin-embedded cleared organs”) is pipeline combine deparaffinization of FFPE embedded tumor specimens, iDISCO clearing and phenotyping of tumor tissue. Tumor FFPE samples are widely stored in biobanks and used for diagnostics, and their 3D analysis could potentially help to improve stratification of cancer patients.[8]

Clearing methods, including 3DISCO, was mainly developed for neuroscience research first. The reason is in high morphological and functional complexity of nervous system, which investigation is time-consuming and laborious with classical histology methods.[21][31] Majority of studies is therefore focused on mouse central nervous system (rodents are one of main model organisms for neurobiology). Authors of 3DISCO method used it first for studying regeneration in the central nervous system (CNS) of mouse, including counting of microglia, astrocytes and mapping trajectories of axons after injury.[2] 3DISCO was also used for mapping the development of mouse CNS.[2] Its modification iDISCO was used for functional studies of brain activity[10] or for mapping amyloid plaques, microglia, vasculature and other properties of brains in Alzheimer diseased patients and mouse models.[32] Modification uDISCO was then used for single cell mapping of neurons in whole unsectioned CNS of mouse.

In recent years the use of “DISCO” methods is broadened to research on many other tissues, including single-cell mapping of transplanted stem cells in whole mouse organs,[3] imaging of whole human embryos in different developmental stages[11] or examination and diagnostics of human tumors tissue.[8]