Apatheism
Apatheism (/ˌæpəˈθiːɪzəm/; a portmanteau of apathy and theism) is the attitude of apathy towards the existence or non-existence of God(s). It is more of an attitude rather than a belief, claim, or belief system.[1][2] The term was coined by Robert Nash in 2001.[3]
Part of a series on |
Irreligion |
---|
Part of a series on |
God |
---|
An apatheist is someone who is not interested in accepting or rejecting any claims that gods exist or do not exist. The existence of a god or gods is not rejected, but may be designated irrelevant.[4] One of the first recorded apatheists was arguably Denis Diderot (1713 - 1784), who wrote: "It is very important not to mistake hemlock for parsley, but to believe or not believe in God is not important at all."
Scientist and philosopher Ian von Hegner has argued that apatheism is an alternative to positions such as theism, atheism, and agnosticism, with implications that have been overlooked in modern philosophical discussions.[4] Philosopher Trevor Hedberg has called apatheism "uncharted territory in the philosophy of religion."[1]
Mindset
Apatheism considers the question of the existence or nonexistence of deities to be fundamentally irrelevant in every way that matters.[4] This position should not be understood as a skeptical position in a manner similar to that of, for example, atheists or agnostics who question the existence of deities or whether we can know anything about them.[5]
The existence of deities is not put aside for moral or epistemic reasons—for democratic or existential reasons, it is deemed unnecessary. This is a universalization of the fundamental democratic principle that there are no first- and second-class humans and that among other species or beings (including hypothetical deities or aliens elsewhere in the universe), human beings also are not second class. In this version, the existence of deities is thus not one of the so-called grand questions in life.[4]
Reasoning
Irrelevance
Apatheists may feel that even if there were gods/deities and the existence and legitimacy of them were proven, it would not make a difference to them for one reason or another; therefore, which one(s), if any, are real does not matter and any discussion about it is meaningless. This approach is similar to that of practical atheism.
Lack of interest
An apatheist may not have any interest in the god debate simply for lack of interest in the topic.[6] Apatheism, a portmanteau of apathy and atheism, in dialog in the public domain popularly represents a general apathy towards theism, though the two words seem (literally) more towards a general apathy towards atheism. This possibly confounds refined usage of apathy, with regard to theism and atheism, and assumes too broad a spectrum for an individual to place himself. Perhaps a more apt coining of the word is needed. This might be aptheist. It dismisses atheism from the inquiry and leaves us with apathy and theism, which I believe is the more fundamental inquiry. Regarding the latter, there was a time in human history that predated inquiry into the topic. Humanity developed and expounded upon the topic taking it to its current presence in daily life but that was much later. Thinking in terms of pre-theistic mankind, that would be how aptheism begs to be defined. In this context man has come full circle from the time when theism did not exist, through inception and development, to its dismissal altogether where no thought is given to it. The argument can be lodged that man is aware of theism but chooses to dismiss it but that's not aptheism. It is wholly a stance unconcerned about the topic; a developed unawareness if you will, that naturally develops in an individual who devolves and dismisses the topic altogether without thought of malice towards it. It is a difficult grasp, perhaps, but an apt ascription nonetheless.
Morality
This apatheistic argument states that morals do not come from God and that if a god exists, there would be no changes with regards to morality; therefore, a god's existence or non-existence is irrelevant.
Related views
Apathetic agnosticism
A view related to apatheism, apathetic agnosticism claims that no amount of debate can prove or disprove the existence of one or more deities, and if one or more deities exist, they do not appear to be concerned about the fate of humans; therefore, their existence has little to no impact on personal human affairs and should be of little interest.[7][8]
Practical atheism
The view that one should live their life with disregard towards a god or gods. Practical atheism does not see the god questions as irrelevant, in contrast to apatheism.[9][10] Thus: "practical atheism is disregard for the answers to [God questions], not a disregard for [God questions] per se. Unlike atheism proper, the practical atheist acts as if God does not exist and has no authority over his life despite his belief in God. Hence, practical atheism and not actual atheism." [11]
See also
References
- Sean Phillips (November 7, 2013). "Apatheism: Should we care whether God exists?". nooga.com. Archived from the original on August 5, 2017. Retrieved September 30, 2018.
- Austin Cline (July 16, 2017). "What Is an Apatheist?". ThoughtCo. Retrieved October 14, 2018.
- Robert J. Nash, Religious Pluralism in the Academy: Opening the Dialogue (2001)
- Von Hegner, Ian (July 29, 2016). "Gods and Dictatorships: A Defence of Heroical Apatheism". Science, Religion & Culture. 3 (1). doi:10.17582/journal.src/2016/3.1.31.48. Retrieved October 14, 2018.
- Jonathan Rauch (May 2003). "Let it Be". The Atlantic. Retrieved September 30, 2018.
- Kimberly Winston (June 9, 2014). "Academic, activist or apatheist: What kind of unbeliever are you?". washingtonpost.com. Retrieved October 14, 2018.
- John Tyrrell (1996). "Commentary on the Articles of Faith". Archived from the original on 2007-08-07.
To believe in the existence of a god is an act of faith. To believe in the nonexistence of a god is likewise an act of faith. There is no verifiable evidence that there is a Supreme Being nor is there verifiable evidence there is not a Supreme Being. Faith is not knowledge. We can only state with assurance that we do not know.
- Austin Cline (March 8, 2017). "Agnosticism for Beginners - Basic Facts About Agnosticism and Agnostics". ThoughtCo. Retrieved October 14, 2018.
- Zdybicka, Zofia J. (2005). "Atheism" (PDF). In Maryniarczyk, Andrzej (ed.). Universal Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 1. Polish Thomas Aquinas Association. Retrieved 2010-05-04.
- Austin Cline (July 2, 2017). "Definition of Practical Atheist". ThoughtCo. Retrieved October 14, 2018.
- Kyle Beshears (December 2019). "Athens without a Statue to the Unknown God". Themelios. Retrieved October 21, 2020.