Azumaya algebra

In mathematics, an Azumaya algebra is a generalization of central simple algebras to R-algebras where R need not be a field. Such a notion was introduced in a 1951 paper of Goro Azumaya, for the case where R is a commutative local ring. The notion was developed further in ring theory, and in algebraic geometry, where Alexander Grothendieck made it the basis for his geometric theory of the Brauer group in Bourbaki seminars from 1964–65. There are now several points of access to the basic definitions.

Over a ring

An Azumaya algebra[1] over a commutative ring $R$ is an $R$ -algebra $A$ that is finitely generated, faithful, and projective as an $R$ -module, such that the tensor product $A\otimes _{R}A^{\circ }$ (where $A^{\circ }$ is the opposite algebra) is isomorphic to the matrix algebra ${\text{End}}_{R}(A)\cong M_{r}(R)$ via the map sending $a\otimes b$ to the endomorphism $x\mapsto axb$ of $A$ .

Examples over a field

Over a field $k$ , Azumaya algebras are completely classified by the Artin-Wedderburn theorem since they are the same as central simple algebras. These are algebras isomorphic to the matrix ring $M_{n}(D)$ for some division algebra $D$ over $k$ . For example, quaternion algebras provide examples of central simple algebras.

Examples over local rings

Given a local commutative ring $(R,{\mathfrak {m}})$ , an $R$ -algebra $A$ is Azumaya if and only if A is free of positive finite rank as an R-module, and the algebra $A\otimes _{R}(R/{\mathfrak {m}})$ is a central simple algebra over $R/{\mathfrak {m}}$ , hence all examples come from central simple algebras over $R/{\mathfrak {m}}$ .

Cyclic algebras

There is a class of Azumaya algebras called cyclic algebras which generate all similarity classes of Azumaya algebras over a field $K$ , hence all elements in the Brauer group ${\text{Br}}(K)$ (defined below). Given a finite cyclic Galois field extension $L/K$ of degree $n$ , for every $b\in K^{*}$ and any generator $\sigma \in {\text{Gal}}(L/K)$ there is a twisted polynomial ring $L[x]_{\sigma }$ , also denoted $A(\sigma ,b)$ , generated by an element $x$ such that

$x^{n}=b$

and the following commutation property

$l\cdot x=\sigma (x)\cdot l$

holds. As a vector space over $L$ , $L[x]_{\sigma }$ has basis $1,x,x^{2},\ldots ,x^{n-1}$ with multiplication given by

$x^{i}\cdot x^{j}={\begin{cases}x^{i+j}&{\text{ if }}i+j<n\\x^{i+j-n}b&{\text{ if }}i+j\geq n\\\end{cases}}$

Note that give a geometrically integral variety[2] $X/K$ , there is also an associated cyclic algebra for the quotient field extension ${\text{Frac}}(X_{L})/{\text{Frac}}(X)$ .

Brauer group of a ring

Over fields, there is a cohomological classification of Azumaya algebras using Étale cohomology. In fact, this group, called the Brauer group, can be also defined as the similarity classes[1]^:3 of Azumaya algebras over a ring $R$ , where rings $A,A'$ are similar if there is an isomorphism

$A\otimes _{R}M_{n}(R)\cong A'\otimes _{R}M_{n}(R)$

of rings for some $n$ . Then, this equivalence is in fact an equivalence relation, and if $A_{1}\sim A_{1}'$ , $A_{2}\sim A_{2}'$ , then $A_{1}\otimes _{R}A_{2}\sim A_{1}'\otimes _{R}A_{2}'$ , showing

$[A_{1}]\otimes [A_{2}]=[A_{1}\otimes _{R}A_{2}]$

is a well defined operation. This forms a group structure on the set of such equivalence classes called the Brauer group, denoted ${\text{Br}}(R)$ . Another definition is given by the torsion subgroup of the etale cohomology group

${\text{Br}}_{coh}(R):={\text{H}}_{et}^{2}({\text{Spec}}(R),\mathbb {G} _{m})_{tors}$

which is called the cohomological Brauer group. These two definitions agree when $R$ is a field.

Brauer group using Galois cohomology

There is another equivalent definition of the Brauer group using Galois cohomology. For a field extension $E/F$ there is a cohomological Brauer group defined as

${\text{Br}}^{coh}(E/F):=H_{\text{Gal}}^{2}({\text{Gal}}(E/F),E^{\times })$

and the cohomological Brauer group for $F$ is defined as

${\text{Br}}^{coh}(F)={\underset {E/F}{\text{colim}}}H_{\text{Gal}}^{2}({\text{Gal}}(E/F),E^{\times })$

where the colimit is taken over all finite Galois field extensions.

Computation for a local field

Over a local non-archimedean field $F$ , such as the p-adic numbers $\mathbb {Q} _{p}$ , local class field theory gives the isomorphism

${\text{Br}}^{Coh}(F)\cong \mathbb {Q} /\mathbb {Z}$ [3]^{pg 193}

of abelian groups. This is because given abelian field extensions $E_{2}/E_{1}/F$ there is a short exact sequence of Galois groups

$0\to {\text{Gal}}(E_{2}/E_{1})\to {\text{Gal}}(E_{2}/F)\to {\text{Gal}}(E_{1}/F)\to 0$

and from Local class field theory, there is the following commutative diagram

${\begin{matrix}H_{\text{Gal}}^{2}({\text{Gal}}(E_{2}/F),E_{1}^{\times })&\to &H_{\text{Gal}}^{2}({\text{Gal}}(E_{1}/F),E_{1}^{\times })\\\downarrow &&\downarrow \\\left({\frac {1}{[E_{2}:E_{1}]}}\mathbb {Z} \right)/\mathbb {Z} &\to &\left({\frac {1}{[E_{1}:F]}}\mathbb {Z} \right)/\mathbb {Z} \end{matrix}}$ [4]

where the vertical maps are isomorphisms and the horizontal maps are injections.

n-torsion for a field

Recall there is the Kummer sequence[5]

$1\to \mu _{n}\to \mathbb {G} _{m}\xrightarrow {\cdot n} \mathbb {G} _{m}\to 1$

giving a long exact sequence in cohomology for a field $F$ . Since Hilbert's Theorem 90 implies $H^{1}(F,\mathbb {G} _{m})=0$ , there is an associated short exact sequence

$0\to H_{et}^{2}(F,\mu _{n})\to {\text{Br}}(F)\xrightarrow {\cdot n} {\text{Br}}(F)\to 0$

showing the second etale cohomology group with coefficients in the n-th roots of unity $\mu _{n}$ is

$H_{et}^{2}(F,\mu _{n})={\text{Br}}(F)_{n-tors}$

Generators of n-torsion classes in the Brauer Group over a field

The Galois symbol, or norm-residue symbol, is a map from the n-torsion Milnor K-theory group $K_{2}^{M}(F)\otimes \mathbb {Z} /n$ to the etale cohomology group $H_{et}^{2}(F,\mu _{n}^{\otimes 2})$ , denoted by

$R_{n,F}:K_{2}^{M}(F)\otimes _{\mathbb {Z} }\mathbb {Z} /n\mathbb {Z} \to H_{et}^{2}(F,\mu _{n}^{\otimes 2})$ [5]

It comes from the composition of the cup product in etale cohomology with the Hilbert's Theorem 90 isomorphism

$\chi _{n,F}:F^{*}\otimes _{\mathbb {Z} }\mathbb {Z} /n\to H_{et}^{1}(F,\mu _{n})$

hence

$R_{n,F}(\{a,b\})=\chi _{n,F}(a)\cup \chi _{n,F}(b)$

It turns out this map factors through $H_{et}^{2}(F,\mu _{n})={\text{Br}}(F)_{n-tors}$ , whose class for $\{a,b\}$ is represented by a cyclic algebra $[A(\sigma ,b)]$ . For the Kummer extension $E/F$ where $E=F({\sqrt[{n}]{a}})$ , take a generator $\sigma \in {\text{Gal}}(E/F)$ of the cyclic group, and construct $[A(\sigma ,b)]$ . There is an alternative, yet equivalent construction through Galois cohomology and etale cohomology. Consider the short exact sequence of trivial ${\text{Gal}}({\overline {F}}/F)$ -modules

$0\to \mathbb {Z} \to \mathbb {Z} \to \mathbb {Z} /n\to 0$

The long exact sequence yields a map

$H_{Gal}^{1}(F,\mathbb {Z} /n)\xrightarrow {\delta } H_{Gal}^{2}(F,\mathbb {Z} )$

For the unique character

${\displaystyle \chi$

with $\chi (\sigma )=1$ , there is a unique lift

${\overline {\chi }}:{\text{Gal}}({\overline {F}}/F)\to \mathbb {Z} /n$

and

$\delta ({\overline {\chi }})\cup (b)=[A(\sigma ,b)]\in {\text{Br}}(F)$

note the class $(b)$ is from the Hilberts theorem 90 map $\chi _{n,F}(b)$ . Then, since there exists a primitive root of unity $\zeta \in \mu _{n}\subset F$ , there is also a class

$\delta ({\overline {\chi }})\cup (b)\cup (\zeta )\in H_{et}^{2}(F,\mu _{n}^{\otimes 2})$

It turns out this is precisely the class $R_{n,F}(\{a,b\})$ . Because of the Norm residue isomorphism theorem, $R_{n,F}$ is an isomorphism and the $n$ -torsion classes in ${\text{Br}}(F)_{n-tors}$ are generated by the cyclic algebras $[A(\sigma ,b)]$ .

Skolem-Noether theorem

One of the important structure results about Azumaya algebras is the Skolem-Noether theorem: given a commutative ring $R$ and an Azumaya algebra $R\to A$ , the only automorphisms of $A$ are inner. Meaning, the map

$A^{*}\to {\text{Aut}}(A)$ [6]

sending

$a\mapsto (x\mapsto a^{-1}xa)$

is surjective. This is important because it directly relates to the cohomological classification of similarity classes of Azumaya algebras over a scheme. In particular, it implies an Azumaya algebra has structure group ${\text{PGL}}_{n}$ for some $n$ , and the Čech cohomology group

${\check {H}}^{1}((X)_{et},{\text{PGL}}_{n})$

gives a cohomological classification of such bundles. Then, this can be related to $H_{et}^{2}(X,\mathbb {G} _{m})$ using the exact sequence

$1\to \mathbb {G} _{m}\to {\text{GL}}_{n}\to {\text{PGL}}_{n}\to 1$

It turns out the image of $H^{1}$ is a subgroup of the torsion subgroup $H_{et}^{2}(X,\mathbb {G} _{m})_{tors}$ .

On a scheme

An Azumaya algebra on a scheme X with structure sheaf ${\mathcal {O}}_{X}$ , according to the original Grothendieck seminar, is a sheaf ${\mathcal {A}}$ of ${\mathcal {O}}_{X}$ -algebras that is étale locally isomorphic to a matrix algebra sheaf; one should, however, add the condition that each matrix algebra sheaf is of positive rank. This definition makes an Azumaya algebra on $(X,{\mathcal {O}}_{X})$ into a 'twisted-form' of the sheaf $M_{n}({\mathcal {O}}_{X})$ . Milne, Étale Cohomology, starts instead from the definition that it is a sheaf ${\mathcal {A}}$ of ${\mathcal {O}}_{X}$ -algebras whose stalk ${\mathcal {A}}_{x}$ at each point $x$ is an Azumaya algebra over the local ring ${\mathcal {O}}_{X,x}$ in the sense given above.

Two Azumaya algebras ${\mathcal {A}}_{1}$ and ${\mathcal {A}}_{2}$ are equivalent if there exist locally free sheaves ${\mathcal {E}}_{1}$ and ${\mathcal {E}}_{2}$ of finite positive rank at every point such that

A_{1}\otimes \mathrm {End} _{{\mathcal {O}}_{X}}({\mathcal {E}}_{1})\simeq A_{2}\otimes \mathrm {End} _{{\mathcal {O}}_{X}}({\mathcal {E}}_{2}),

[1]^:6

where $\mathrm {End} _{{\mathcal {O}}_{X}}({\mathcal {E}}_{i})$ is the endomorphism sheaf of ${\mathcal {E}}_{i}$ . The Brauer group $B(X)$ of X (an analogue of the Brauer group of a field) is the set of equivalence classes of Azumaya algebras. The group operation is given by tensor product, and the inverse is given by the opposite algebra. Note that this is distinct from the cohomological Brauer group which is defined as $H_{et}^{2}(X,\mathbb {G} _{m})$ .

Example over Spec(Z[1/n])

The construction of a quaternion algebra over a field can be globalized to ${\text{Spec}}(\mathbb {Z} [1/n])$ by considering the noncommutative $\mathbb {Z} [1/n]$ -algebra

$A_{a,b}={\frac {\mathbb {Z} [1/n]\langle i,j,k\rangle }{i^{2}-a,j^{2}-b,ij-k,ji+k}}$

then, as a sheaf of ${\mathcal {O}}_{X}$ -algebras, ${\mathcal {A}}_{a,b}$ has the structure of an Azumaya algebra. The reason for restricting to the open affine set ${\text{Spec}}(\mathbb {Z} [1/n])\hookrightarrow {\text{Spec}}(\mathbb {Z} )$ is because the quaternion algebra is a division algebra over the points $(p)$ is and only if the Hilbert symbol

$(a,b)_{p}=1$

which is true at all but finitely many primes.

Example over Pⁿ

Over $\mathbb {P} _{k}^{n}$ Azumaya algebras can be constructed as ${\mathcal {End}}_{k}({\mathcal {E}})\otimes _{k}A$ for an Azumaya algebra $A$ over a field $k$ . For example, the endomorphism sheaf of ${\mathcal {O}}(a)\oplus {\mathcal {O}}(b)$ is the matrix sheaf

${\mathcal {End}}_{k}({\mathcal {O}}(a)\oplus {\mathcal {O}}(b))={\begin{pmatrix}{\mathcal {O}}&{\mathcal {O}}(b-a)\\{\mathcal {O}}(a-b)&{\mathcal {O}}\end{pmatrix}}$

so an Azumaya algebra over $\mathbb {P} _{k}^{n}$ can be constructed from this sheaf tensored with an Azumaya algebra $A$ over $k$ , such as a quaternion algebra.

Applications

There have been significant applications of Azumaya algebras in diophantine geometry, following work of Yuri Manin. The Manin obstruction to the Hasse principle is defined using the Brauer group of schemes.

References

Milne, J. S., 1942- (1980). Étale cohomology (PDF). Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-08238-3. OCLC 5028959. Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 June 2020.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
meaning it is an integral variety when extended to the algebraic closure of its base field
Serre, Jean-Pierre. (1979). Local Fields. New York, NY: Springer New York. ISBN 978-1-4757-5673-9. OCLC 859586064.
"Lectures on Cohomological Class Field Theory" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 22 June 2020.
Srinivas, V. (1994). "8. The Merkurjev-Suslin Theorem". Algebraic K-Theory (Second ed.). Boston, MA: Birkhäuser Boston. pp. 145–193. ISBN 978-0-8176-4739-1. OCLC 853264222.
$A^{*}$ is the group of units in $A$

Brauer group and Azumaya algebras

Milne, John. Etale cohomology. Ch IV
Knus, Max-Albert; Ojanguren, Manuel (1974), Théorie de la descente et algèbres d'Azumaya, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 389, Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag, doi:10.1007/BFb0057799, MR 0417149, Zbl 0284.13002
Mathoverflow Thread on "Explicit examples of Azumaya algebras"

Division algebras

Knus, Max-Albert (1991), Quadratic and Hermitian forms over rings, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, 294, Berlin etc.: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 3-540-52117-8, Zbl 0756.11008
Saltman, David J. (1999). Lectures on division algebras. Regional Conference Series in Mathematics. 94. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society. ISBN 0-8218-0979-2. Zbl 0934.16013.

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.

[:0-1] Milne, J. S., 1942- (1980). Étale cohomology (PDF). Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-08238-3. OCLC 5028959. Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 June 2020.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

[2] t is an integral variety when extended to the algebraic closure of its base field

[3] Serre, Jean-Pierre. (1979). Local Fields. New York, NY: Springer New York. ISBN 978-1-4757-5673-9. OCLC 859586064.

[4] "Lectures on Cohomological Class Field Theory" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 22 June 2020.

[:1-5] Srinivas, V. (1994). "8. The Merkurjev-Suslin Theorem". Algebraic K-Theory (Second ed.). Boston, MA: Birkhäuser Boston. pp. 145–193. ISBN 978-0-8176-4739-1. OCLC 853264222.

[6] $A^{*}$ is the group of units in $A$