Bar examination in the United States
Bar examinations in the United States are examinations administered to candidates for admission to the bar in U.S. states and territories. Bar exams are administered by states or territories, generally by agencies under the authority of state supreme courts.[lower-alpha 1] Bar examinations are currently required for admission to the bar in all U.S. jurisdictions except Wisconsin.[1] Almost all states use some examination components created by the National Conference of Bar Examiners (NCBE). 37 jurisdictions have adopted the Uniform Bar Examination (UBE), which is composed entirely of NCBE-created components.
Legal education in the United States |
---|
Stages |
Exams and licensure |
Organizations |
History
In 1738, Delaware created the first bar exam with other American states soon following suit.[2] In the 19th century, requirements for bar admission was minimal. In fact, in the wake of Jacksonian Democracy, there was a movement in many states to open the bar to all "decent citizens" who had read and understand the law.[3] Prospective lawyers relied on apprenticeships, self-studying, and oral examination for bar admission.[4]
Content of the bar examination
The bar examination is generally administered over two days (in some cases, three days).[5] In most jurisdictions, it is administered twice a year, in February and July.[1] Bar examinations in all but two jurisdictions in the United States use some examination component created by the National Conference of Bar Examiners (NCBE).
Multistate Bar Examination (MBE)
The MBE is a standardized test consisting of 200 multiple-choice questions covering seven key areas of law: constitutional law, contracts, criminal law and procedure, federal rules of civil procedure, federal rules of evidence, real property, and torts.[6] The MBE formerly addressed only six topics, with civil procedure added by the NCBE in 2009 and administered starting in 2015.[7] Examinees have three hours to answer 100 questions in a morning session and the same for an afternoon session. The MBE is administered in all U.S. states and territories, except Louisiana and Puerto Rico, which follow civil law systems very different from the legal systems in other states.[1][8] The MBE is administered in most jurisdictions on the last Wednesday in February and July.
Of the 200 questions, 175 are scored and 25 are questions under evaluation for future use.[6] The NCBE grades the MBE using a scaled score ranging from 40 to 200.[9] Taking the MBE in one jurisdiction may allow an applicant to use his or her MBE score to waive into another jurisdiction or to use the MBE score with another state's bar examination.[10] The average raw score from the summer exam historically has been about 128, or about 67% correct, while the average scaled score in 2007 was about 140.[11] In summer 2007, the average scaled score was 143.7 with a standard deviation of 15.9. Over 50,000 applicants took the test; less than half that number took it in the winter.
Multistate Essay Examination (MEE)
The MEE consists of six 30-minute essay questions that examines a candidate's ability to analyze legal issues and communicate them effectively in writing. In addition to the topics examined in the MBE, the MEE also covers business law, commercial law, conflicts of law, estates and probate law, and family law. The MEE is administered on the last Tuesday in February and July, the day before the MBE.
The NCBE drafts nine MEE questions, and jurisdictions select six or seven questions to administer. The questions are drafted by the NCBE Drafting Committee, with the assistance of outside academics and practitioners who are experts in the fields being tested, and then reviewed by outside experts and state boards of bar examiners. Unlike the MBE, which is graded and scored by the NCBE, the MEE is graded exclusively by the jurisdiction that administers the bar examination.[12] Each jurisdiction has the choice of grading MEE questions according to general U.S. common law or the jurisdiction's own law.[13]
Multistate Performance Test (MPT)
The MPT is a "closed-universe" test in which each candidate is required to perform a standard lawyering task, such as a memo or brief. The candidate is provided with a case file and a "library" which contains all of the substantive law required to perform the task (plus some non-relevant material). The MPT is administered on the last Tuesday in February and July, the same day as the MEE. The NCBE provides two MPT questions.[14] The MPT is usually situated in the fictional state of Franklin.
Components created by states and territories
California and Pennsylvania draft and administer their own performance tests.
California began administering three-hour-long performance tests in 1983, based on the results of a July 1980 experiment.[15] California performance tests are far more difficult than the MPT. Starting with the July 2017 bar examination, California switched to a 90-minute format[16] but continues to prepare its own performance tests, which are usually situated in the fictional state of Columbia.
Essay questions are the most variable component of the bar exam. States emphasize different areas of law in their essay questions depending upon their respective histories and public policy priorities. For example, unlike Texas and Alta California, Louisiana did not convert to the common law when it was acquired by the United States, so its essay questions require knowledge of the state's unique civil law system. Several states whose family law was influenced by Spanish and Mexican civil law, like California and Texas, require all bar exam applicants to demonstrate knowledge of community property law. Pennsylvania, with a history of federal tax evasion (e.g., the Whiskey Rebellion), tests federal income tax law, while New Jersey, with a history of discriminatory zoning (resulting in the controversial Mount Laurel doctrine), tests zoning and planning law. New Mexico, South Dakota, and Washington each test Indian law, because of their relatively large populations of Native Americans and large numbers of Indian reservations. Most states test knowledge of the law of negotiable instruments and secured transactions (Articles 3 and 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code), but Alaska, California, Minnesota, and Pennsylvania do not; they have recognized that the vast majority of criminal, personal injury, and family lawyers will never draft a promissory note or litigate the validity of a security interest.
Uniform Bar Examination (UBE)
The Uniform Bar Examination (UBE) is a standardized bar examination in the United States developed by the NCBE. It consists solely of the MBE, MEE, and MPT, and offers portability of scores across state lines. According to the NCBE, the UBE is intended to "test knowledge and skills that every lawyer should be able to demonstrate prior to becoming licensed to practice law", and "is uniformly administered, graded, and scored by user jurisdictions and results in a portable score."[17] UBE jurisdictions are allowed to additionally test candidates' knowledge of state-specific law, through either a test or course.[17]
The UBE was created in 2011, and was first administered that year by Missouri and North Dakota.[18] It has since been adopted by 37 United States jurisdictions (out of a possible 56).[19] The American Bar Association also endorsed the UBE at its 2016 mid-year meeting.[20] However, some of the largest legal markets—including California and Florida—have not adopted the UBE. Concerns include the lack of questions on state law, and that the test provides NCBE with control over the bar credentialing process.[21] In addition, the largest UBE market (New York), indicated that it may withdraw from the UBE, after a task force commissioned by the New York State Bar found in 2020 that “since the adoption of the UBE, the fundamental purpose of the bar examination, which is to protect the public, has been lost.”[22][23]
A number of jurisdictions are considering or have considered adoption of the UBE:
- In 2015, the Kentucky Supreme Court Bar Admission Review Commission rejected adopting the UBE.[24][25] Former Justice Bill Cunningham, who co-led the commission, stated in a January 2020 interview that he believes Kentucky will eventually adopt the UBE.[26]
- In 2016, the Virginia Board of Bar Examiners considered the UBE, but stated that “it is not in the best interests of the public of Virginia or the Virginia judicial system.”[27]
- In December 2018, the Indiana Supreme Court created a commission to review the future of the state bar examination.[28] In 2019, a majority of the commission recommended adoption of the UBE.[29][30][26] A previous Indiana task force had rejected adoption of the UBE in a report issued in January 2017.[31]
- In September 2019, the Oklahoma Supreme Court created a Bar Examination Advisory Committee to consider adoption of the UBE. A final report is due by December 2020.[32]
- In May 2020, Nevada indicated that it will not adopt the UBE anytime in the near future. In Nevada, the UBE is supported by the dean of University of Nevada Law School[33] but opposed by the chair of the state Board of Bar Examiners.[34][35][36]
Preparation for the bar examination
Most law schools teach students common law and how to analyze hypothetical fact patterns like a lawyer, but do not specifically prepare law students for any particular bar exam. Only a minority of law schools offer bar preparation courses.
To refresh their memory on "black-letter rules" tested on the bar, most students engage in a regimen of study (called "bar review") between graduating from law school and sitting for the bar.[37] For bar review, most students in the United States attend a private bar review course which is provided by a third-party company and not their law school.[38]
Overview of bar examination by jurisdiction
Jurisdiction | UBE | MBE | MEE | MPT | Locally administered exam components |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alabama | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | |
Alaska | |||||
Arizona | |||||
Arkansas | |||||
California | 8 essay questions, 1 performance test | ||||
Colorado | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ||
Connecticut | |||||
Delaware | 8 essay questions | ||||
District of Columbia | ✔ | ✔ | |||
Florida | 3 essay questions, 100 multiple-choice questions | ||||
Georgia | ✔ | 4 essay questions | |||
Guam | ✔ | 1 essay question | |||
Hawaii | 15 multiple-choice questions | ||||
Idaho | ✔ | ||||
Illinois | |||||
Indiana | 6 essay questions | ||||
Iowa | ✔ | ✔ | |||
Kansas | |||||
Kentucky | Combination of locally drafted and MEE essay questions | ||||
Louisiana | 9 locally developed sections | ||||
Maine | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | |
Maryland | |||||
Massachusetts | |||||
Michigan | 15 essay questions | ||||
Minnesota | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ||
Mississippi | 6 essay questions | ||||
Missouri | ✔ | ||||
Montana | |||||
Nebraska | |||||
Nevada | 8 essay questions | ||||
New Hampshire | ✔ | ✔ | |||
New Jersey | |||||
New Mexico | |||||
New York | New York Law Exam | ||||
North Carolina | |||||
North Dakota | |||||
Northern Mariana Islands | 2 essay questions | ||||
Ohio[lower-alpha 2] | ✔ | ||||
Oklahoma | 16 essay questions | ||||
Oregon | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ||
Pennsylvania | 6 essay questions, 1 performance test | ||||
Puerto Rico | 8 essay questions, 184 multiple-choice questions | ||||
Rhode Island | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | |
South Carolina | |||||
South Dakota | 1 Indian law question | ||||
Tennessee | ✔ | ||||
Texas[lower-alpha 3] | |||||
Utah | |||||
Vermont | |||||
Virgin Islands | |||||
Virginia | 9 essay questions, 10 multiple-choice questions | ||||
Washington | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ||
West Virginia | |||||
Wisconsin | Combination of MEE, MPT, and locally drafted essay questions | ||||
Wyoming | ✔ |
Details of UBE by jurisdiction
State or territory | In-state score | Transfer score | First UBE administration | Additional exam or course | UBE transfer eligibility |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alabama | 260 | 260 | July 2011 | Yes | 25 months |
Alaska | 280 | 280 | July 2014 | No | 60 months |
Arizona | 273 | 273 | July 2012 | Yes | |
Arkansas[40] | 270 | 270 | February 2020 | No | 36 months |
Colorado[41] | 276 | 276 | February 2012 | No | 36 months[lower-alpha 4] |
Connecticut[42] | 266 | 266 | February 2017 | No | 36 months |
District of Columbia[43] | July 2016 | No | 60 months | ||
Idaho[44] | 272 | 280 | February 2012 | No | 37 months |
Illinois[45] | 266 | 266 | July 2019 | No | 48 months |
Iowa | February 2016 [46] | No | 60 months[lower-alpha 5] | ||
Kansas | February 2016 | No | 36 months | ||
Maine | 276 | 276 | July 2017 | No | |
Maryland[47] | 266 | 266 | July 2019 | Yes | |
Massachusetts[48] | 270 | 270 | July 2018 [49] | Yes | |
Minnesota | 260 | 260 | February 2014 | No | |
Missouri | February 2011 | Yes | 24 months | ||
Montana[50] | 266 | 266 | July 2013 [51] | Yes | 36 months |
Nebraska | 270 | 270 | February 2012 | No | |
New Hampshire | February 2014 | No | 36 months[lower-alpha 6] | ||
New Jersey | 266 | 266 | February 2017 | No | 36 months |
New Mexico | 260 | 260 | February 2016 | Yes | |
New York[52] | 266 | 266 | July 2016 [53] | Yes | |
North Carolina[54] | 270 | 270 | February 2019 | Yes | |
North Dakota | 260 | 260 | February 2011 | No | 24 months |
Ohio[55] | 270[56] | 270 | July 2020 | No | 60 months |
Oregon[57] | 274 | 274 | July 2017 | No | 36 months |
Rhode Island[58] | 276 | 276 | February 2019 | Yes | 24 months |
South Carolina | 266 | 266 | February 2017 | Yes | 36 months |
Tennessee[59] | 270 | 270 | February 2019[60] | No | |
Texas[61] | 270[62] | February 2021 | Yes | 24/60 | |
Utah[63] | 270 | February 2013 | No | 24/60[lower-alpha 7] months | |
Vermont | July 2016 | No | 36 months[lower-alpha 8] | ||
Washington[64] | July 2013 | Yes | 40 months | ||
West Virginia[65] | July 2017 | No | 36 months | ||
Wyoming | July 2013 | No | |||
U.S. Virgin Islands[66] | 266 | 266 | July 2017 | Yes |
Criticism
Arguments against bar exams
A statement by the Society of American Law Teachers (SALT)[67] articulates many criticisms of the bar exam.[68] The SALT statement, however, does propose some alternative methods of bar admission that are partially test-based. A response to the SALT statement was made by Suzanne Darrow-Kleinhaus in The Bar Examiner[69]
Arguments for alternatives to the bar exam
The NCBE published an article in 2005 addressing alternatives to the bar exam, including a discussion of the Daniel Webster Scholar Honors Program, an alternate certification program introduced at the University of New Hampshire School of Law (formerly Franklin Pierce Law Center) in that year.
Notes
- Sometimes the agency is an office or committee of the state's highest court or intermediate appellate court. In some states which have a unified or integrated bar association (meaning that formal membership in a public corporation controlled by the judiciary is required to practice law therein), the agency is either the state bar association or a subunit thereof. Other states split the integrated bar membership and the admissions agency into different bodies within the judiciary; in Texas, the Board of Law Examiners is appointed by the Texas Supreme Court and is independent from the integrated State Bar of Texas.
- First UBE administration in July 2020.
- First UBE administration in February 2021. Until then, Texas will not administer the MEE and will include locally-administered components of 20 short answer questions and 12 essay questions.
- 3 years + 2 years active practice immediately preceding
- with proof upon filing of regular practice 2 of 3 years immediately preceding
- if older than 3 years, applicant must show practice for prior 2 years and was in good standing for the whole duration
- for attorneys of other jurisdictions with proof of full-time law practice for at least half of the time since passing the exam
- if engaged in the practice of law for 2 years and in good standing
References
- National Conference of Bar Examiners and American Bar Association Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar (2020). "Comprehensive Guide to Bar Admission Requirements 2020" (PDF). Retrieved July 22, 2020.
- California Bar Background information, accessed April 21, 2009 Archived May 10, 2009, at the Wayback Machine
- William Burnham, Introduction to the Law and Legal System of the United States, 4th ed. (St. Paul: Thomson West, 2006), 135.
- "Preparing for the MBE". NCBE. Archived from the original on 2017-01-23. Retrieved 2017-01-23.
- Jones, Leigh (2009-01-15). "Potential Major Changes to Bar Exams Considered". The National Law Journal. Archived from the original on 2014-02-23. Retrieved 2009-11-23.
- "Jurisdictions Using the MBE in 2008". National Conference of Bar Examiners. Archived from the original on 14 September 2008. Retrieved 14 August 2008.
- "MBE Scores". National Conference of Bar Examiners. Retrieved 2020-07-24.
- "Bar Admission Guide" (PDF). NCBE. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2013-01-15. Retrieved 2 May 2015.
- "2007 Statistics" (PDF). The Bar Examiner. 2008. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-10-10.
- "Why Jurisdictions May Want to Implement the MEE". National Conference of Bar Examiners. Archived from the original on 2007-07-08. Retrieved 2007-04-30.
- "Multistate Essay Examination (MEE)". National Conference of Bar Examiners. Archived from the original on 30 April 2007. Retrieved 30 April 2007.
- "Multistate Performance Test". National Conference of Bar Examiners. Retrieved 2020-07-24.
- Ward, Stephanie Francis (8 January 2020). "A better bar exam? Law profs weigh in on whether test accurately measures skills required for law practice". ABA Journal. American Bar Association. Retrieved 22 September 2020.
- Hansen, Mark (28 July 2015). "California bar exam to be one day shorter, but could be just as difficult". ABA Journal. Retrieved 10 October 2020.
- "The Uniform Bar Examination (UBE)". National Conference of Bar Examiners. Retrieved June 30, 2015.
- "General UBE FAQs". National Conference of Bar Examiners. Retrieved April 16, 2014. Click on "Which jurisdictions administer the UBE?"
- "Uniform Bar Examination". NCBE. Retrieved 2020-07-21.
- "Midyear Meeting 2016: ABA adopts Resolution 109 on Uniform Bar Examination". ABA News. February 11, 2016. Retrieved February 6, 2017.
- Jones, Leigh (2009-10-12). "Uniform Bar Exam Drawing Closer to Reality". The National Law Journal. Archived from the original on October 15, 2009. Retrieved November 23, 2009.
- https://nysba.org/app/uploads/2020/03/Report-of-the-NYSBA-Task-Force-on-the-New-York-Bar-Examination-With-Appendix-compressed.pdf
- "NYSBA Adopts Report Calling For Fundamental Change to Uniform Bar Exam". New York State Bar Association. 2020-04-04. Retrieved 2020-07-24.
- Report of the Bar Admissions Review Commission – July 2015
- "Important Changes to the Kentucky Bar Exam — Brandeis Law Intranet". louisville.edu.
- Odendahl, Marilyn. "Uniform Bar Exam adoption not unanimous".
- "Jury Out on Uniform Bar Exam's Effect on Minorities | Bloomberg BNA". October 5, 2016. Archived from the original on 2016-10-05.
- TheStatehouseFile.com, James Polston. "Supreme Court panel reviewing bar exam". Washington Times Herald.
- Report of the Study Commission on the Future of the Indiana Bar Exam
- Odendahl, Marilyn. "Study commission advises Indiana adopt Uniform Bar Exam".
- https://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.inbar.org/resource/resmgr/docs/Report-January-2017.pdf
- Order-Creation of the Oklahoma Bar Examination Advisory Committee
- https://www.nvbar.org/wp-content/uploads/NevadaLawyer_April2018_DeansColumn-UBE.pdf
- https://www.nvbar.org/wp-content/uploads/NevadaLawyer_April2018_BarExam.pdf
- https://www.nvbar.org/wp-content/uploads/NevadaLawyer_April2018_Reciprocity.pdf
- https://www.abajournal.com/files/ADKT558filedpetition.pdf
- Mark E. Steiner, "International Conference on Legal Education Reform: Cram Schooled", 24 Wis. Int'l L.J. 377, 392 (2006). This article contrasts American bar review courses against the 18-month cram schools used in Japan, Germany, Korea, and Taiwan, and argues that the short length of American bar review is due to the superior pedagogical methods of American law schools and the American tradition of relatively easy access to the legal profession (in comparison to most countries).
- Wayne L. Anderson and Marilyn J. Headrick, The Legal Profession: Is it for you? (Cincinnati: Thomson Executive Press, 1996), 103.
- National Conference of Bar Examiners and American Bar Association Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar (2020). "Comprehensive Guide to Bar Admission Requirements 2020" (PDF). Retrieved July 22, 2020.
- "IN RE RULES GOVERNING ADMISSION TO THE BAR AND ADMISSION TO THE BAR REGULATION 7 - Arkansas Courts". opinions.arcourts.gov.
- "Eligibility Requirements for Application by Uniform Bar Exam Score Transfer". Colorado Supreme Court. Retrieved 2017-07-12.
- "FAQs - Admission by Examination". State of Connecticut - Judicial Branch. Retrieved 2016-09-26.
- "Jurisdiction Information". NCBE. Retrieved 2016-09-26.
- "UBE Score Transfer Information". Idaho State Bar. Retrieved 2017-03-02.
- "Illinois Supreme Court Adopts Uniform Bar Exam". Illinois State Bar Association.
- "Iowa adopts the Uniform Bar Examination (UBE)". National Conference of Bar Examiners.
- "NCBE Jurisdiction Information: Maryland". Retrieved December 12, 2018.
- "Board of Bar Examiners". Massachusetts Court System. 2013-07-19. Retrieved 2017-03-10.
- "UBE hits 24th state with Massachusetts". ABA for Law Students. Archived from the original on 25 August 2016.
- "Admissions Information - State Bar of Montana". www.montanabar.org. Retrieved 2016-09-26.
- , University of Montana School of Law Bar Exam Information
- "Uniform Bar Examination, New York Law Course & New York Law Exam". New York State Bar. Retrieved 2017-03-02.
- Clifford, Stephanie; Jr, James C. McKinley (5 May 2015). "New York to Adopt a Uniform Bar Exam Used in 15 Other States". Retrieved April 15, 2019 – via NYTimes.com.
- Kubik, Erika (December 4, 2017). "More Than Half of US Jurisdictions Have Adopted the UBE". 2Civility. Illinois Supreme Court Commission on Professionalism. Retrieved December 4, 2017.
- Yeager, Anne. "Ohio Supreme Court Adopts Uniform Bar Examination". www.courtnewsohio.gov. Retrieved August 16, 2018.
- "UBE FAQ". www.supremecourt.ohio.gov. Retrieved 2019-09-19.
- "Jurisdiction Information". NCBE. Retrieved 2016-10-18.
- "RI to Adopt Uniform Bar Examination". Rhode Island Bar Association. Retrieved June 9, 2018.
- "In Re: Amendment of Rule 7, Rules of the Tennessee Supreme Court" (PDF).
- "Jurisdiction Information". NCBE.
- McCarthy, Osler. "COURT APPROVES UNIFORM BAR EXAMINATION FOR TEXAS". www.txcourts.gov/. Retrieved January 27, 2019.
- "Texas Board of Law Examiners - News". ble.texas.gov. Retrieved 2019-04-17.
- "Admission Rules". Utah State Bar. Retrieved March 2, 2017.
- "Uniform Bar Exam". Washington State Bar Association. Retrieved 2017-07-12.
- "WVSC adopts Uniform Bar Examination". The State Journal.
- "PROMULGATION No. 2017-005" (PDF). Virgin Island Supreme Court. Retrieved July 12, 2017.
- "Society of American Law Teachers". Archived from the original on 2015-04-23. Retrieved 2 May 2015.
- 54 JOURNAL OF LEGAL EDUCATION 442–458
- Suzanne Darrow-Kleinhaus, "A Response to Criticism of the Bar Exam", The Bar Examiner, May 2005 "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original on December 3, 2010. Retrieved 2011-02-17.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)