Benedict of Peterborough

Benedict first makes his appearance in 1174, as the chancellor of Archbishop Richard, the successor of Becket in the primacy. In 1175, Benedict became prior of Holy Trinity, Canterbury; in 1177, he received from Henry II the abbacy of Peterborough, which he held until his death. As abbot he distinguished himself by his activity in building, in administering the finances of his house and in collecting a library. He is described in the Chronicon Petroburgense as "blessed both in name and deed".[1][2]

Benedict belonged to the circle of Becket's admirers, and wrote two works dealing with the martyrdom and the miracles of his hero. Fragments of the former work have come down to us in the compilation known as the Quadrilogus, which is printed in the fourth volume of James Craigie Robertson's Materials for the Histories of Thomas Becket ("Rolls" series); the miracles are extant in their entirety, and are printed in the second volume of the same collection.[3]

Benedict was formerly credited with the authorship of the Gesta on the ground that his name appears in the title of the oldest manuscript. There is, however, conclusive evidence that Benedict merely caused this work to be transcribed for the Peterborough library. It is only through the force of custom that the work is still occasionally cited under his name.[4] In the twentieth century, D. M. Stenton formulated the theory, developed further by David Corner, and now generally accepted, that the true author of the Gesta was in fact Roger of Howden. On his return from the Third Crusade, he drew upon them in composing his larger Chronica, revising them and adding supplementary material.

In the nineteenth century, the question of authorship had been discussed by T. D. Hardy, William Stubbs and Felix Liebermann. Stubbs conjecturally identified the first part of the Gesta (1170–1177) with the Liber Tricolumnis, a register of contemporary events kept by Richard Fitz Neal, the treasurer of Henry II and author of the Dialogus de Scaccario; the latter part (1177–1192) was ascribed by Stubbs to Roger of Howden. His theory concerning the Liber Tricolumnis, was rejected by Liebermann and other editors of the Dialogus (A. Hughes, C. G. Crump and C. Johnson, Oxford, 1902).[3]

•  This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Davis, Henry William Carless (1911). "Benedictus Abbas". In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica. 3 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 724–725.
• Dialogus de Scaccario in the Oxford edition of 1902 — the introduction
• Gesta Regis Henrici Secundi et Gesta Regis Ricardi Benedicti abbatis (ed. William Stubbs) (2 vols., Rolls series, 1867), and particularly the preface to the first volume — It is available at Gallica.
• Liebermann, F., Einleitung in den Dialogus de Scaccario (Göttingen, 1875)
• Ostenglische Geschichtschellen (Hanover, 1892)
• Pertz, G.H., Monumenta Germaniae Historica, Scriptores, vol. xxvii. pp. 82, 83
• Stapleton, T., ed. (1849), Chronicon Petroburgense, Camden Society, OCLC 604801475

• Barlow, Frank (1950). "Roger of Howden", English Historical Review, vol. 65.
• Corner, David (1983). "The Earliest Surviving Manuscripts of Roger of Howden's Chronica", English Historical Review, vol. 98.
• Corner, David (1983). "The Gesta Regis Henrici Secundi and Chronica of Roger, Parson of Howden", Bulletin of the Institute of Historical research, vol. 56.
• Gillingham, John (1994), "Roger of Howden on Crusade", in Richard Cœur de Lion: Kingship, Chivalry and War in the Twelfth Century, London.
• Stenton, D. M. (1953). "Roger of Howden and Benedict", English Historical Review, vol. 68.