CHL Import Draft

The Import Draft has inherent risks that teams must assess, before making a draft pick which costs $2,000 up front.[5] Drafted players may choose not to report, therefore teams want to be certain a player will.[4] Potential draftees have often been previously chosen in the NHL Entry Draft, and thus have an incentive to report to a CHL team because NHL teams want prospects closer for development.[4] Also, there is more exposure to scouts in North America for imports not drafted by an NHL team.[4] Competition with the KHL Junior Draft for the same player is also an obstacle.[6] Imported players usually prefer playing in the CHL instead of the United States Hockey League, due to the higher level of competition.[7]

Most CHL teams have contacted few players in advance of the draft.[8] Scouting these players is difficult as most teams do not employ European scouts, but rather rely on videos and limited exposure at international tournaments.[9] Players may also have professional contracts in European domestic leagues.[8] The current system can be compared to an auction, where teams are bidding for services in competition with these other leagues, and have to pay large release fees.[10]

Once an import draftee reports to a CHL team, there is also risk involved in whether the player adapts to being far away from home, the ability to speak English or French, playing on smaller ice surfaces, and the more physical North American game.[9] There is a year-long moratorium on trading the pick, once in the CHL, which is to prevent bidding for services by larger market clubs. [10] One benefit of selecting an import player before he is drafted into the NHL, is that he is treated like a North American player in the sense that he will either have to play in the CHL or NHL, and not in the American Hockey League.[11]

Teams may choose any player who meets age requirements, and resides outside of the normal territorial claims for the entry draft of the constituent leagues.[4] Foreign-born players have come to North America to play minor hockey in Canada or the United States, and earn local status to avoid the Import Draft.[12][13] Draft eligibility is based on the parents’ full-time residence, by looking at housing deeds, banking records, or lease agreements, rather than the length of time spent in the country.[12] Cases for local status are dealt with individually by the CHL.[12] Examples of foreign-born players classified as locals include, David Levin from Israel, Daniel Sprong from the Netherlands, and Alex Galchenyuk from a Belarussian father, despite being born in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.[12] Examples of players denied local status include, Ivan Provorov and Toronto Maple Leafs prospect Nikita Korostelev from Russia, and Tampa Bay Lightning prospect Dennis Yan, despite being born in Portland, Oregon.[12]

Teams from the QMJHL have fewer American states to choose from compared to the WHL and OHL, and use the import draft to build competitive rosters.[7] The New England states also see tough competition from NCAA Division I colleges for the same players.[7]

On June 11, 2013, the CHL announced that the upcoming Import Draft would be the final opportunity to select European goalkeepers.[16] Teams could draft 1994 or 1995 birth-year goalkeepers only in first round of the 2013 Import Draft, and current import goalkeepers in the CHL would remain eligible to continue playing until the standard age limit.[16] The CHL cited the need to improve Canadian goalkeeping as a reason behind the change.[16] The move is seen as a response to Hockey Canada's recent inability to develop top notch goaltenders.[17][18] The Canadian junior team had not won a World Junior Championship since 2009, which was blamed on poor goalkeeping.[17][18] Other signs of Canada's goalkeeper weakness include: the 2013 CHL Goaltender of the Year award went to Patrik Bartosak of the Czech Republic,[19] all three Vezina Trophy finalists in the 2012–13 NHL season were Europeans,[20] and a Canadian had not been the first goalkeeper chosen in the NHL Entry Draft in five years.[17][18] Arguments were made that Canadian goalkeepers were not getting a chance to develop, and that teams contending for a championship were drafting goaltenders from Europe.[13] The change may actually benefit the banned goalkeepers, as statistics indicate that the best European goalkeepers have been developed in their own domestic leagues.[21]

The CHL began reevaluating the ban in February, 2018, in cooperation with Hockey Canada.[1] Commissioner David Branch said that the ban was never viewed as a mistake, and its reversal was not trying to right a wrong; rather it was about comparing the development programs since put in place to best serve the interest of the Canadian goalkeeper.[1] USA Hockey has implemented similar programs, and the USHL recently slackened its import player rules, allowing more Canadians and Europeans.[1] The proposal to resume drafting European goalkeepers claims that it brings more competition, and forces Canadians to prove their talents against a broader pool.[13] In the four NHL Entry Drafts since the ban was implemented, 36 goalkeepers have been selected from Europe, 26 from elsewhere in North America (NCAA, USHL, NAHL), and 22 from the CHL.[13] For the 2018 draft, the ban was lifted and European goalkeepers became eligible again for selection.[22][23]

List of CHL Import Draft selections, organized by IIHF member association of origin. (Updated as of 2017 draft)[2]

Notes

• Canadian Hockey League Import Draft page
• Elite Prospects - CHL Import Draft