Ceratodon purpureus

Ceratodon purpureus is a dioicous moss with a color ranging from yellow-green to red.[1] The height amounts to 3 centimeters. It is found worldwide, mainly in urban areas and next to roads on dry sand soils.[2] It can grow in a very wide variety of habitats, from polluted highway shoulders and mine tailings to areas recently denuded by wildfire to the bright slopes of Antarctica.[3] Its common names include redshank,[4] purple forkmoss,[4] ceratodon moss, fire moss, and purple horn toothed moss.

Ceratodon purpureus
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Plantae
Division: Bryophyta
Class: Bryopsida
Subclass: Dicranidae
Order: Dicranales
Family: Ditrichaceae
Genus: Ceratodon
Species:
C. purpureus
Binomial name
Ceratodon purpureus
Synonyms

Ceratodon dimorphus
Mielichhoferia recurvifolia.

Description

Fire moss is a native, short moss that forms dense tufts or sometimes cushions.[5][6] The stems are erect, usually about 0.5 inch (1.3 cm) long. The upper 0.19 inch (0.5 cm) is current year's growth;[5] often slightly branched by forking at the tip of the old growth.[7] The stems sometimes become 2.4 to 3.1 inches (7–8 cm) long in shaded places.[8] Leaves are short and hairlike, spreading when moist; somewhat folded or twisted when dry.[5][7]

Fire moss contains photoprotective pigments, which are a useful adaptation for the bright Antarctic environment.[9] Leaf pigment varies from green to ginger.[9]

Distribution and habitat

Fire moss likely occurs in every country throughout the world but is possibly replaced by closely related taxa in tropical latitudes.[10] It is widespread throughout Canada, where it is known from every province and territory.[10] In the United States it occurs in every state.[10]

Fire moss is able to tolerate much higher pollution levels than other mosses.[11] It is common in urban and industrial environments subjected to a variety of pollutants, along highways, and on the tailings and refuse associated with both coal and heavy-metal mining activities.[11]

Fire moss is often found on disturbed sites. It occurs on a wide range of substrates including soil, rock, wood, humus, old roofs, sand, and cracks of sidewalks.[5][7][10] It is most abundant on exposed, compact, mineral, dry, gravelly or sandy soils but tolerates a wide range of soil textures.[5] Sand dunes close to water in Scotland are colonized by fire moss, which grows between the shoots of grasses.[11]

Life cycle

Fire moss is dioecious,[5] reproducing generatively with spores and vegetatively through protonemata. The capsules are held horizontally on the end of a long seta (fruit stalk).[5] Fire moss generally fruits abundantly.[7] Wind is the main method of spore dispersal.[12]

Spore germination in fire moss is a two-phase process. Spores first swell then distend.[13] Usually the setae are present in great numbers in the colony; with changes in humidity they twist and untwist. This movement helps to jerk the capsules, helping in spore discharge. Possibly the contraction of the grooves in the capsule at maturity also helps to squeeze out the spores.[5] Spores of fire moss have remained viable even after drying for 16 years.[11]

Fire moss reproduces vegetatively via protonemata (threadlike or platelike growths).[14]

Fire moss sporophytes appear early in the spring, as soon as the snow melts.[6] In March, the setae reach their full height and begin to turn from green to red. Capsules mature by late spring.[7] By midsummer the capsules often decay, and the setae break from the moss.[8]

Microarthropod-mediated fertilization

A 2012 study has found that male and female fire moss emit different and complex volatile organic scents.[15] Female plants emit more compounds than male plants. Springtails were found to choose female plants preferentially, and the study found that springails enhance moss fertilization. All together, the results seem to suggest a plant-pollinator relationship analogous to those found in flower plants.[15]

Ecology

Fire moss prefers low competition and high light; however, it is somewhat shade tolerant.[16][17] It is a colonizer of disturbed sites and readily invades mineral soil by spores.[12] Fire moss is typically found associated with other species characteristic of disturbed sites such as fireweed (Epilobium angustifolium) and pearly everlasting (Anaphalis margaritacea).[18] Fire moss is often replaced by flowering plants in later stages of succession.[11] In the black spruce (Picea mariana)-lichen woodlands of Alaska and Canada, the first stage of revegetation, which lasts from 1 to 20 years, is dominated by pioneer mosses such as fire moss. Fire moss continues to increase in the early part of the shrub stage but begins to decrease toward the end of this stage.[19]

Fire moss will colonize burned areas through lightweight, off-site, wind-dispersed spores.[14][20] High-severity fire, which exposes mineral soil, provides ideal conditions for the germination of fire moss spores. Fire moss is often the dominant vegetation for several years following high-severity fire.[11] It produces few spores late in the first postfire year and many in the second.[20] If fire takes place in early spring; gametophores can develop in 4 to 5 months. If the fire takes place in the fall, colonization is slower.[11]

References

This article incorporates text from the following source, which (as a U.S. government work) is in the public domain: Tesky, Julie L. 1992. "Ceratodon purpureus". Fire Effects Information System. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory.

  1. Flora of North America
  2. Species Profile Archived May 11, 2008, at the Wayback Machine
  3. US Forest Service Fire Ecology
  4. Edwards, Sean R. (2012). English Names for British Bryophytes. British Bryological Society Special Volume. 5 (4 ed.). Wootton, Northampton: British Bryological Society. ISBN 978-0-9561310-2-7. ISSN 0268-8034.
  5. Shaw, J.; Jules, E. S.; Beer, S. C. 1991. Effects of metals on growth, morphology, and reproduction of Ceratodon purpureus. Bryologist. 94(3): 270-277.
  6. Bland, John H. 1971. Forests of Lilliput. The realm of mosses and lichens. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  7. Dunham, Elizabeth Marie. 1951. How to know the mosses: a popular guide to the mosses of the United States. Boston, MA: The Mosher Press.
  8. Grout, A. J. 1932. Moss flora of North America, north of Mexico. Vol. 3. Part 3. New York: The author.
  9. Post, A. 1990. Photoprotective pigment as an adaptive strategy in the Antarctic moss Ceratodon purpureus. Polar Biology. 10(4): 241-246.
  10. Ireland, R. R. 1982. Moss flora of the Maritime Provinces. Publications in Botany No. 13. [Ottawa, ON]: National Museum of Natural Sciences.
  11. Richardson, D. H. 1981. The biology of mosses. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
  12. Perez, Francisco L. 1991. Ecology and morphology of globular mosses of Grimmia longirostris in the Paramo de Piedras Blancas, Venezuelan Andes. Arctic and Alpine Research. 23(2): 133-148.
  13. Olesen, Peter; Mogensen, Gert Steen. 1978. Ultrastructure, histochemistry and notes on germination stages of spores in selected mosses. The Bryologist. 81(4): 493-516.
  14. Auclair, A. N. D. 1983. The role of fire in lichen-dominated tundra and forest-tundra. In: Wein, Ross W.; MacLean, David A., eds. The role of fire in northern circumpolar ecosystems. Scope 18. New York: John Wiley & Sons: 235-256.
  15. Rosenstiel, T. N.; Shortlidge, E. E.; Melnychenko, A. N.; Pankow, J. F.; Eppley, S. M. (2012). "Sex-specific volatile compounds influence microarthropod-mediated fertilization of moss". Nature. 489 (7416): 431–433. doi:10.1038/nature11330. PMID 22810584.
  16. Hall, Christine N.; Kuss, Fred R. 1989. Vegetation alteration along trails in Shenandoah National Park, Virginia. Biological Conservation. 48: 211-227.
  17. Klinka, K.; Krajina, V. J.; Ceska, A.; Scagel, A. M. 1989. Indicator plants of coastal British Columbia. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press.
  18. Cormack, R. G. H. 1953. A survey of coniferous forest succession in the eastern Rockies. Forestry Chronicle. 29: 218-232.
  19. Viereck, L. A.; Dyrness, C. T. 1979. Ecological effects of the Wickersham Dome Fire near Fairbanks, Alaska. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-90. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station.
  20. Crane, M. F.; Habeck, James R.; Fischer, William C. 1983. Early postfire revegetation in a western Montana Douglas-fir forest. Res. Pap. INT-319. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.