Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) and nonpartisan U.S. government ethics and accountability watchdog organization.[2][3][4] Founded in 2003 as a counterweight to conservative government watchdog groups such as Judicial Watch, CREW works to expose ethics violations and corruption by government officials and institutions and to reduce the role of money in politics.

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington
Founded2003
FounderNorman L. Eisen, Melanie Sloan
Type501(c)(3)
03-0445391
Location
Key people
Noah Bookbinder, Executive Director
Revenue
$2,657,927 (2013)[1]
WebsiteCitizensForEthics.org

Its activities include investigating, reporting and litigating government misconduct, requesting and forcing government information disclosure through FOIA requests, and filing congressional ethics complaints against individuals, institutions and agencies.[5][4] Its projects have included the publication of "CREW's Most Corrupt Members of Congress", an annual report in which CREW lists the people it determines to be the Federal government of the United States's most corrupt politicians. From 2005 and 2014 the annual reports named 25 Democrats and 63 Republicans.

David Brock became CREW's chairman in 2014 and stepped down in 2016. He was replaced by Richard Painter, who went on to take a leave of absence to run as a Democrat in Minnesota's 2018 U.S. Senate special election. Under Painter's leadership, CREW has pursued aggressive litigation against the Trump administration, which it calls the "most unethical presidency" in U.S. history. CREW filed 41 lawsuits during George W. Bush's administration, 38 during Barack Obama's administration and, by January 2018, 180 against the Trump administration.[6]

History

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington was co-founded in 2003 by Norman L. Eisen and Melanie Sloan in part as a counterweight to conservative watchdog groups such as Judicial Watch. Sloan initially ran the fledgling organization by herself; by 2007, CREW had 13 staff members.[7][8] By 2016, the group had four lawyers on staff.

Chairmanships of David Brock and Richard Painter

In August 2014, liberal political operative David Brock was elected chairman of CREW's board of directors. At the time, USA Today wrote that "One of the most vocal congressional ethics watchdog groups is becoming part of a Democratic political operation."[9] Politico wrote that Brock's newly announced involvement with CREW was a "major power play that aligns liberal muscle more fully behind the Democratic Party" and that CREW would add a "more politically oriented arm, expand its focus into state politics and donor targeting and will operate in close coordination with Brock's growing fleet of aggressive Democrat-backing nonprofits and super PACs — Media Matters, American Bridge, and the American Independent Institute."[10] Prior to Brock's involvement with CREW, the group had aggressively targeted Republican public officials as well as some Democrats. The Center for Public Integrity wrote that "Many key staffers left soon after Brock became its chairman, and since then, the organization has almost exclusively pursued Republicans and conservative organizations through federal complaints and its own investigations."[11] In April 2016, Bloomberg reported that Republicans had faced the vast majority of CREW investigations in recent months.[12]

Brock left CREW's board of directors in December 2017, but did not cut ties with the group and continued to fundraise for it.[6] He was replaced by former George W. Bush White House ethics lawyer Richard Painter, "lending the group a bipartisan air," according to Politico.[13] Painter took a leave of absence from CREW to run as a Democrat in Minnesota's 2018 U.S. Senate special election.[14]

In December 2016, Politico wrote that after its 2003 founding, CREW had "quickly built a strong reputation as an ethics watchdog and transparency advocate, filing complaints against lawmakers from both parties, though the bulk of its ethics work targeted Republicans. However, in recent years CREW faced increased questions about its credibility, stemming from a 2014 shift that brought the group under Brock's sway and—in the eyes of many observers—into the Clinton orbit. Brock and his allies joined the group's board, while several longtime employees left." In 2015, CREW had revenue of just under $2.2 million. CREW filed just one lawsuit in 2015 and three in 2016, all asking the Federal Election Commission for stricter enforcement of campaign finance laws.[6]

Trump administration

CREW has aggressively targeted the Donald Trump administration, filing its first lawsuit against Trump three days after his inauguration as U.S. president. According to New York magazine, "Since then, it has been launching actions against the administration and its allies in Congress at a rate of about one a day, filing lawsuits and public-record inquiries and lodging complaints with authorities like the Office of Government Ethics." In June 2017, New York wrote that "CREW is officially nonpartisan, but it's a thin veneer. For the last few years, it has been loosely aligned with a network of organizations, including the super-PAC American Bridge, run by Democratic operative David Brock. After the election, Brock promised to 'kick Donald Trump's ass,' saying in a fund-raising document that CREW's litigation strategy would assure Trump would be 'afflicted by a steady flow of damaging information.'" CREW co-founder Norman L. Eisen rejoined CREW in December 2016 and set about distancing the organization from Brock.[15] Eisen stepped down from the board in February 2019.[16]

In January 2018, CREW issued a 36-page report on Trump's presidency, calling it the "most unethical presidency" in U.S. history.[17] In February 2018, Environment & Energy Publishing wrote that Painter was "at the center of more than 180 legal challenges to Trump and his administration as vice chairman of the left-leaning Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington."[18]

During the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, the group received $432,000 in federally backed small business loans from Newtek Small Business as part of the Paycheck Protection Program.[19][20]

Mission statements

The organization's website says it is "dedicated to promoting ethics and accountability in government and public life by targeting government officials who sacrifice the common good to special interests."[5] The CREW mission statement has changed several times between 2005 and 2008 to de-emphasize its focus on personal litigation, dropping language that once read that CREW "differs from other good government groups in that it sues offending politicians directly" and that it "is a non-partisan legal watchdog group working to force our government officials to behave responsibly and ethically. CREW's mission is to use the legal system to expose government officials who betray the public interest by serving special interests. CREW aims to counterbalance the conservative legal watchdog groups that made such a strong impact over the past decade". It added that CREW "advances its mission using a combination of research, litigation and media outreach."[21][22]

In 2015, the organization's mission stated, "CREW uses high-impact legal actions to target government officials who sacrifice the common good to special interests [...] we work to ensure government officials — regardless of party affiliation — act with honesty and integrity and merit the public trust."[23]

As of 2018, the organization's mission states, "Dedicated to fighting the influence of money on our political system. CREW uses aggressive legal action, in-depth research, and bold communications to reduce the influence of money in politics and help foster a government that is ethical and accountable. We highlight abuses, change behavior, and lay the groundwork for new policies and approaches that encourage public officials to work for the benefit of the people, not powerful interests."[24]

Activities

According to the organization, its activities include litigation, FOIA requests, congressional ethics complaints, Internal Revenue Service complaints, Federal Election Commission complaints, and requests for investigation with government agencies.[5]

CREW's Most Corrupt list

Each year since 2005, CREW has published its "Most Corrupt Members of Congress" report. The 2012 election cycle saw 11 of the 32 lawmakers included in the last two reports either defeated or retiring.[25] As of 2014, the list had named 88 individuals, 63 of them Republicans and 25 Democrats.[26][27]

Family Affair report

In 2012, CREW released a report entitled Family Affair, which examined how members of Congress had used their positions to benefit themselves and their families. The report included 248 members of the United States House of Representatives, 105 Democrats and 143 Republicans, "about equal to their parties' proportional makeup in the House."[28] Common practices that do not appear to violate laws or House ethics rules but still raise ethical questions[29] include: paying family for congressional office and campaign work, collecting reimbursements from official US House and campaign budgets, earmarking to projects connected with family members, and charging interest on personal loans given to their campaigns.[30][31]

FOIA requests for emails

In 2012, after learning that former EPA administrator Lisa Jackson had used an alias email account to conduct government business, CREW submitted an FOIA request for "records sufficient to show the number of email accounts of or associated with Secretary Hilary Rodham Clinton, and the extent to which those email accounts are identifiable as those of or associated with Secretary Clinton."[32][33] The State Department's FOIA office says the request was closed in May 2013, but had no further information. CREW says it has not received any further information on the request since the State Department acknowledged receiving it.[33]

Criticism of Continuing Appropriations Resolution

CREW raised questions about some of the content of the Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2014 (H.J.Res 59; 113th Congress). One controversial provision of the bill was section 134, which stated that "notwithstanding any other provision of this joint resolution, there is appropriated for payment to Bonnie Englebardt Lautenberg, widow of Frank R. Lautenberg, late a Senator from New Jersey, $174,000."[34] CREW protested the inclusion of this in the bill, since Lautenberg's assets in 2011 were over $57 million. The group questioned why this "death gratuity" was considered a "top funding priority".[34]

Emoluments Clause
See also: CREW v. Trump

A legal team representing CREW (including Laurence H. Tribe, Norman L. Eisen, Erwin Chemerinsky, Richard Painter, and Zephyr Teachout) announced its intention to file suit in federal court in New York on January 23, 2017, on the grounds that President Donald Trump's business interests violate a provision in the Emoluments Clause in the Constitution by receiving payments from foreign government entities. The suit has asked the court to order Trump to stop receiving payments from foreign government via his hotels, golf courses, rentals and leased properties.[35] United States District Judge George B. Daniels dismissed the case on December 21, 2017, holding that plaintiffs lacked standing.[36][37][38][39] CREW announced plans to appeal, and separate Emolument Clause lawsuits are pending in other judicial districts.[40][41]

Presidential Records Act
See also: CREW and National Security Archive v. Trump and EOP

CREW joined with the National Security Archive to challenge Trump's deletion of tweets as a violation of the Presidential Records Act of 1981.[42]

Personnel

Norman L. Eisen, an attorney specializing in fraud, and eventual (in 2009) Special Counsel for Ethics and Government Reform in the White House, co-founded CREW in 2003. He became known for his stringent ethics and anti-corruption efforts, and for limiting registered lobbyists from taking positions in the administration.[26][43]

Melanie Sloan served as CREW's first executive director. In August 2014 former Republican activist and current Democratic activist David Brock was elected chairman of CREW's board, and Sloan announced her intention to resign as executive director, pending Brock's hiring of a new executive director. Prior to co-founding CREW in 2003, Sloan served as one of more than 300 Assistant U.S. Attorneys in the District of Columbia from 1998 to 2003 after having worked for congressional Democrats John Conyers, Charles Schumer, and Joseph Biden.[44] Mark Penn, pollster for Bill Gates, Tony Blair, both Bill and Hillary Clinton, also became a director and vice president at CREW.[45]

Brock was elected as CREW's board president after laying out a broad plan to turn the organization into a more muscular organization. Along with Brock, consultant David Mercer and investor Wayne Jordan joined CREW's board of directors.[26][46]

Noah Bookbinder, a former Justice Department prosecutor and Chief Counsel for the U.S. Senate's Judiciary Committee where he advised Judiciary Committee Chairman Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT), was named executive director of CREW in March, 2015.[47]

Brock left CREW in December 2016, and was replaced as chairman of the board of directors by former George W. Bush ethics lawyer Richard Painter. [48]

Allegations of partisanship

CREW operates as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit prohibited from engaging in partisan activity. In 2010, Ben Smith of Politico described CREW's founding in 2003 as "one of a wave of new groups backed by liberal donors" and called CREW "a vehicle for assaults on largely – but not entirely – Republican targets",[49] but a 2010 Associated Press story stated that CREW "has a history of targeting members of Congress representing different races, philosophies and both major parties."[50]

Writers for The Washington Post have called CREW a "nonpartisan watchdog group"[51] and a "liberal watchdog",[52] while Fox News has called it "a liberal-funded watchdog group"[53] and the New York Daily News has described it as "nonpartisan".[54] The New York Times has called CREW a "liberal government watchdog group"[55] while U.S. News & World Report calls it "nonpartisan".[56] In a report specifically about CREW, the Chicago Tribune noted the group "calls itself nonpartisan, but progressive", and employs staff from both Republican and Democratic administrations.[57]

After CREW named him one of the "13 most corrupt members of Congress" in 2005, U.S. Senator Conrad Burns (R-MT) called the group "partisan hacks" and their allegations "maliciously false". The Billings Gazette reported that CREW defended itself:[58] Naomi Seligman, the group's deputy director, said "We've gone after a fair number of Democrats, even in this study" [and Burns] "should be answering the charges, not slinging charges."

In 2006, Congressional Quarterly reported, "Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington has taken aim almost exclusively at GOP members of Congress. Since its founding in 2003, it [helped] investigate 21 lawmakers, only one of them a Democrat" (Senator Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas, in a complaint that also targeted Senator Bill Frist (R-TN), then Senate Majority Leader).[59][60] A report by McClatchy News Service called CREW "a Democratic-leaning watchdog group".[61]

In 2007, Ms. Magazine quoted longtime Democratic pollster Celinda Lake as saying, "Corruption was a top issue in the [2006] midterm elections, and CREW was critical to the Democrats' success. The fact that they were bipartisan and had created this dirty-dozen list of corrupt politicians really helped people process that these politicians were acting well outside the norm."[7]

The journal Broadcasting & Cable described CREW's former chief legal counsel, Anne Weismann, as "a Democrat-recommended witness and so the closest to an administration defender".[62] In April 2011, CREW was described as "left-leaning" by the Chicago Tribune and Lexington Herald-Leader.

When asked in 2014 if CREW would continue pursuing complaints against Democrats, Brock responded, "No party has a monopoly on corruption and at this early juncture, we are not making categorical statements about anything that we will and won't do. Having said that, our experience has been that the vast amount of violations of the public trust can be found on the conservative side of the aisle."[26] During a span of "recent months" in early 2016, Republicans were reportedly the target of the vast majority of CREW's campaign-finance allegations.[63]

Roll Call article

Roll Call reported in January 2008 that CREW files most of its complaints against members of Congress, and "all but a handful ... have targeted Republicans". The article stated that CREW had issued press releases against Democrats but had usually not filed complaints against them, with the exception of now former Senator Mary Landrieu (D-LA), a conservative Democrat.[21] CREW defended itself to Roll Call:

"CREW is a nonpartisan organization that targets unethical conduct", [Deputy Director Naomi] Seligman wrote... "Now that the Democrats are in power, they will have opportunities for corruption that were previously reserved to Republicans and it is likely we will see more Democratic corruption."

After the article was published, CREW stated that it was "baseless" and "omitted key facts". CREW suggested the Roll Call reporter had been prompted by a conversation with Landrieu, the target of a recent CREW lawsuit at the time.[64]

Funding

Roll Call reported that CREW doesn't disclose its donor list, and quoted former Deputy Director Naomi Seligman as saying that "donors play no role in CREW's decisions as to the groups or politicians we target."[21] Donors to CREW have included such groups as Democracy Alliance, Service Employees International Union, the Arca Foundation,[65] and the Gill Foundation.[21][66][67]

In January 2012, Democracy Alliance dropped a number of prominent organizations, including CREW, from their list of recommended organizations to receive donations. Support was withdrawn because these groups are more apt to work outside the Democratic Party's infrastructure.[68]

See also

References
  1. "IRS 2013 Form 990" (PDF). GuideStar. Internal Revenue Service. Retrieved November 11, 2015.
  2. Blumenthal, Paul (July 9, 2013). "Citizens United Lawyer Jim Bopp Hit With Tax Complaint From Watchdog Group". Huffington Post. Retrieved November 11, 2015.
  3. Secret House GOP Vote Guts Ethics Panel, Prompts Outcry; U.S. News & World Report; Gabrielle Levy; January 3, 2017
  4. Washington Information Directory 2017-2018; CQ Press; 2017; Pg. 327
  5. "About CREW". Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. Archived from the original on September 5, 2012. Retrieved May 16, 2012.
  6. Gerstein, Josh (December 16, 2016). "Liberals cribbing from conservatives' playbook to attack Trump". Politico. Retrieved 6 August 2018.
  7. Linda Burstyn (Winter 2007). "The Most Feared Woman on Capitol Hill?". MsMagazine.com. Archived from the original on December 8, 2015. Retrieved November 11, 2015.
  8. Q&A Interview with Melanie Sloan, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW); CSPAN Transcripts; May 13, 2009.
  9. Singer, Paul (August 14, 2014). "Ethics watchdog drops its non-partisan veneer". USA Today. Retrieved 6 August 2018.
  10. Vogel, Kenneth (August 13, 2014). "David Brock expands empire". Politico. Retrieved 6 August 2018.
  11. Levinthal, David (April 7, 2016). "Inside Hillary Clinton's big-money cavalry". Center for Public Integrity. Retrieved 6 August 2018.
  12. Allison, Bill (April 11, 2016). "CREW's Watchdog Status Fades After Arrival of Democrat David Brock". Bloomberg. Retrieved 6 August 2018.
  13. Debenedetti, Gabriel (January 21, 2017). "Brock groups set $40 million budget to fight Trump". Politico. Retrieved 6 August 2018.
  14. Kwong, Jessica (April 4, 2018). "Trump Has 'No Respect For The Law,' Former White House Ethics Lawyer Says". Newsweek. Retrieved 6 August 2018.
  15. Rice, Andrew (June 12, 2017). "Is Trump Inc. the President's Greatest Vulnerability?". New York. Retrieved 6 August 2018.
  16. "CREW Statement on Norman Eisen". CREW. Retrieved 6 April 2020.
  17. Pasha-Robinson, Lucy (January 17, 2018). "Donald Trump presidency 'most unethical in modern history', report finds". The Independent. Retrieved 6 August 2018.
  18. Northey, Hannah (February 2, 2018). "Former Bush ethics czar on the 'nerd resistance,' suing Trump". E&E News. Retrieved 6 August 2018.
  19. Tom Hamburger; Aaron Gregg; Anu Narayanswamy (8 July 2020). "After railing against federal spending, GOP lawmakers, conservative groups benefit from government aid program". The Washington Post. Retrieved 9 July 2020.
  20. Syed, Moiz; Willis, Derek. "CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON, INC. - Coronavirus Bailouts - ProPublica". ProPublica. Retrieved 9 July 2020.
  21. Singer, Paul (2008-01-29). "Watchdog, Donors Share Common Foes". Roll Call. Retrieved 2010-04-02. CREW has named Democratic Reps. John Murtha (Pa.), Alan Mollohan (W.Va.) and Maxine Waters (Calif.) to its "most corrupt" list, but never has released a separate ethics complaint against any of them.
  22. "Original Mission Statement; website - 2003". Archived from the original on 2004-07-30. Retrieved 2004-07-30.
  23. CREW Mission statement Archived 2015-12-02 at the Library of Congress Web Archives; CitizensForEthics.org; accessed December 15, 2015.
  24. "About Us". Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. Retrieved 23 February 2018.
  25. Lipton, Eric (November 8, 2012). "Ethics in Play, Voters Oust Incumbents Under Scrutiny". The New York Times. Retrieved November 23, 2012.
  26. Vogel, Kenneth (August 13, 2014). "David Brock expands empire". Politico. Retrieved 11 November 2015.
  27. CREW's Most Corrupt Members of Congress; CREW website
  28. Lipton, Eric (March 22, 2012). "Study Shows How House Members and Families Reap Benefits". The New York Times. Retrieved May 28, 2012.
  29. O'Keefe, Ed (March 22, 2012). "Study: Ron Paul's House seat enriches his family". The Washington Post. Retrieved May 28, 2012.
  30. Bingham, Amy (March 22, 2012). "House Members Give Their Families Millions in Campaign Cash". ABC News. Retrieved May 28, 2012.
  31. Family Affair - Full report; CREW website
  32. FOIA Request. CREW. December 6, 2012.
  33. FOIA Request for Hillary Clinton's Email Address Went Missing. The Washington Free Beacon. March 6, 2015.
  34. Kasperowicz, Pete (September 20, 2013). "House spending bill includes $174,000 payment to deceased senator's widow". The Hill. Retrieved September 23, 2013.
  35. Eric Lipton; Adam Liptak (January 22, 2017), "Foreign Payments to Trump Firms Violate Constitution, Suit Will Claim", The New York Times, Washington, DC, retrieved January 22, 2017
  36. "Judge dismisses lawsuit alleging Trump violated Constitution". December 21, 2017.
  37. Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. Trump, 17 Civ. 458 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 21, 2017).
  38. Horowitz, Julia (December 21, 2017). "Judge throws out ethics case against President Trump". CNN. Retrieved 17 July 2018.
  39. Kroll, Andy (December 21, 2017). "Judge Tosses Out Lawsuit Targeting Trump's Foreign Business Dealings". Mother Jones. Retrieved 31 July 2018.
  40. Peter Overby, 1 Emoluments Clause Lawsuit Is Dismissed, Trump Faces Others In 2018, Morning Edition, NPR (January 19, 2018).
  41. Peter Overby, Federal Judge Seems Sympathetic To Anti-Corruption Case Against President Trump, Morning Edition, NPR (January 26, 2018).
  42. "Trump sued for deleting tweets and White House use of encrypted messaging apps". Newsweek. 2017-06-22.
  43. Saslow, Eli (March 13, 2009). "When White House Has Queries About Ethics Rules, Adviser Norm Eisen Answers the Call". The Washington Post. Retrieved December 15, 2012.
  44. "CREW Crew". Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. Retrieved 2010-04-02.
  45. Gerth, Jeff; Van Natta, Jr., Don (2007). Her way: the hopes and ambitions of Hillary Rodham Clinton (1st ed.). New York: Little, Brown and Co. p. 267. ISBN 978-0-316-01742-8. Retrieved 2013-07-19.
  46. "Ethics watchdog drops its non-partisan veneer". USA Today. August 14, 2014.
  47. CREW Names Noah Bookbinder Executive Director; CREW Press release; February 26, 2015.
  48. Norman Eisen and Richard Painter to Lead CREW Board; Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington - Press Release; December 7, 2016
  49. Ben Smith, "Staffing up for Congressional investigations", Politico.com, November 18, 2010.
  50. McGill, Kevin (September 22, 2010). "Watchdog group seeks Senate probe of Vitter". Sulphur Daily News. Associated Press. Archived from the original on July 19, 2013. Retrieved June 16, 2011.
  51. Bacon, Jr., Perry (2010-08-14). "Rep. Maxine Waters blasts ethics panel and media, defends links to OneUnited". The Washington Post. Retrieved 2010-08-14.
  52. David A. Fahrenthold; Jonathan O'Connell (July 25, 2017). "Liberal watchdog group sues Trump, alleging he violated constitutional ban". The Washington Post. Retrieved July 25, 2017.
  53. "Watchdog group files lawsuit against Trump over foreign payments". Fox News Channel. January 23, 2017. Retrieved January 24, 2017.
  54. President Trump's deep ties to his business empire remain, trust documents show; New York Daily News; Chris Sommerfeldt; February 4, 2017
  55. Katherine Rosman (June 1, 2017). "Eric Goode, a New York Night-Life Impresario, Takes On Trump". The New York Times. Retrieved July 25, 2017.
  56. Secret House GOP Vote Guts Ethics Panel, Prompts Outcry ; U.S. News & World Report; Gabrielle Levy; Jan. 3, 2017
  57. A look at the group suing Trump over business conflicts; Chicago Tribune; January 23, 2017
  58. Johnson, Charles S. (2005-10-02). "Burns calls 'corrupt' label from group 'maliciously false'". Billings Gazette. Retrieved 2008-07-31.
  59. Bolton, Alexander (March 14, 2006). "Watchdog's tax status, politics are questioned". The Hill.
  60. Congressional Quarterly Weekly, volume 65, p. 107
  61. Greg Gordon,"Congressman in tight race for re-election comes under federal investigation" Archived 2015-12-08 at the Wayback Machine, mcclatchydc.com, October 13, 2006.
  62. online "House Republicans Hammer White House on Transparency", Broadcasting & Cable magazine, May 3, 2011.
  63. Allison, Bill (April 11, 2016). "CREW's Watchdog Status Fades After Arrival of Democrat David Brock". Bloomberg. Retrieved 17 July 2018.
  64. CREW archives; accessed November 11, 2015.
  65. Arca Foundation
  66. Daniels, Alex (2009-09-24). "Inquiry is sought in Ross deal". Arkansas Democrat-Gazette. Retrieved 2010-04-03.
  67. VandeHei, Jim (2006-07-17). "A New Alliance Of Democrats Spreads Funding: But Some in Party Bristle At Secrecy and Liberal Tilt". The Washington Post. Retrieved 2010-04-04.
  68. Grim, Ryan (2012-02-28). "Liberal Donor Network Dumps Progressive Organizations". Huffington Post.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.