DIDO (software)

DIDO (/ˈdaɪdoʊ/ DY-doh) is a software product for solving general-purpose optimal control problems.[1][2][3][4][5] It is widely used in academia,[6][7][8] industry,[3][9] and NASA.[10][11][12] Hailed as a breakthrough software,[13][14] DIDO is based on the pseudospectral optimal control theory of Ross and Fahroo.[15] The latest enhancements to DIDO are described in Ross.[1]

Usage

DIDO utilizes trademarked expressions and objects[1][2] that facilitate a user to quickly formulate and solve optimal control problems.[8][16][17][18] Rapidity in formulation is achieved through a set of DIDO expressions which are based on variables commonly used in optimal control theory.[2] For example, the state, control and time variables are formatted as:[1][2]

  • primal.states,
  • primal.controls, and
  • primal.time

The entire problem is codified using the key words, cost, dynamics, events and path:[1][2]

  • problem.cost
  • problem.dynamics
  • problem.events, and
  • problem.path

A user runs DIDO using the one-line command:[1]

[cost, primal, dual] = dido(problem, algorithm),

where the object defined by algorithm allows a user to choose various options. In addition to the cost value and the primal solution, DIDO automatically outputs all the dual variables that are necessary to verify and validate a computational solution.[2] The output dual is computed by an application of the covector mapping principle.

Theory

DIDO implements a spectral algorithm[1][15][19] based on pseudospectral optimal control theory founded by Ross and his associates.[3] The covector mapping principle of Ross and Fahroo eliminates the curse of sensitivity[2] associated in solving for the costates in optimal control problems. DIDO generates spectrally accurate solutions [19] whose extremality can be verified using Pontryagin's Minimum Principle. Because no knowledge of pseudospectral methods is necessary to use it, DIDO is often used[7][8][9][20] as a fundamental mathematical tool for solving optimal control problems. That is, a solution obtained from DIDO is treated as a candidate solution for the application of Pontryagin's minimum principle as a necessary condition for optimality.

Applications

DIDO is used world wide in academia, industry and government laboratories.[9] Thanks to NASA, DIDO was flight-proven in 2006.[3] On November 5, 2006, NASA used DIDO to maneuver the International Space Station to perform the zero-propellant maneuver.

Since this flight demonstration, DIDO was used for the International Space Station and other NASA spacecraft.[12][21][22][23][24][25] It is also used in other industries.[2][9][20][26] Most recently, DIDO has been used to solve traveling salesman type problems in aerospace engineering.[27]

MATLAB optimal control toolbox

DIDO is also available as a MATLAB "toolbox" product.[28] It does not require the MATLAB Optimization Toolbox or any other third-party software like SNOPT or IPOPT or other nonlinear programming solvers.[1]

The MATLAB/DIDO toolbox does not require a "guess" to run the algorithm. This and other distinguishing features have made DIDO a popular tool to solve optimal control problems.[4][7][14]

The MATLAB optimal control toolbox has been used to solve problems in aerospace,[11] robotics[1] and search theory.[2]

History

The optimal control toolbox is named after Dido, the legendary founder and first queen of Carthage who is famous in mathematics for her remarkable solution to a constrained optimal control problem even before the invention of calculus. Invented by Ross, DIDO was first produced in 2001.[1][2][6][16] The software is widely cited[6][7][20][26] and has many firsts to its credit:[10] [11] [12] [13] [15] [17] [29]

  • First general-purpose object-oriented optimal control software
  • First general-purpose pseudospectral optimal control software
  • First flight-proven general-purpose optimal control software
  • First embedded general-purpose optimal control solver
  • First guess-free general-purpose optimal control solver

Versions

Several different versions of DIDO are available from Elissar Global.[30]

See also

References
  1. Ross, Isaac (2020). "Enhancements to the DIDO Optimal Control Toolbox". arXiv:2004.13112 [math.OC].
  2. Ross, I. M. A Primer on Pontryagin's Principle in Optimal Control, Second Edition, Collegiate Publishers, San Francisco, 2015.
  3. Ross, I. M.; Karpenko, M. (2012). "A Review of Pseudospectral Optimal Control: From Theory to Flight". Annual Reviews in Control. 36 (2): 182–197. doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2012.09.002.
  4. Eren, H., "Optimal Control and the Software," Measurements, Instrumentation, and Sensors Handbook, Second Edition, CRC Press, 2014, pp.92-1-16.
  5. Ross, I. M.; D'Souza, C. N. (2005). "A Hybrid Optimal Control Framework for Mission Planning". Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics. 28 (4): 686–697. Bibcode:2005JGCD...28..686R. doi:10.2514/1.8285. S2CID 15828363.
  6. Rao, A. V. (2014). "Trajectory Optimization: A Survey". Optimization and Optimal Control of Automotive Systems. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences. LNCIS 455: 3–21. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-05371-4_1. ISBN 978-3-319-05370-7.
  7. Conway, B. A. (2012). "A Survey of Methods Available for the Numerical Optimization of Continuous Dynamical Systems". Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications. 152 (2): 271–306. doi:10.1007/s10957-011-9918-z.
  8. A. M. Hawkins, Constrained Trajectory Optimization of a Soft Lunar Landing From a Parking Orbit, S.M. Thesis, Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2005. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/32431
  9. Q. Gong, W. Kang, N. Bedrossian, F. Fahroo, P. Sekhavat and K. Bollino, Pseudospectral Optimal Control for Military and Industrial Applications, 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, New Orleans, LA, pp. 4128-4142, Dec. 2007.
  10. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. "Fact Sheet: International Space Station Zero-Propellant Maneuver (ZPM) Demonstration." June 10, 2011. (Sept. 13, 2011) http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/research/experiments/ZPM.html
  11. W. Kang and N. Bedrossian, "Pseudospectral Optimal Control Theory Makes Debut Flight, Saves nasa $1m in Under Three Hours," SIAM News, 40, 2007.
  12. L. Keesey, "TRACE Spacecraft's New Slewing Procedure." NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Dec. 20, 2010. (Sept. 11, 2011) http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/sunearth/news/trace-slew.html.
  13. B. Honegger, "NPS Professor's Software Breakthrough Allows Zero-Propellant Maneuvers in Space." Navy.mil. United States Navy. April 20, 2007. (Sept. 11, 2011) http://www.elissarglobal.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Navy_News.pdf.
  14. Kallrath, Josef (2004). Modeling Languages in Mathematical Optimization. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 379–403.
  15. Ross, I. M.; Fahroo, F. (2004). "Pseudospectral Knotting Methods for Solving Optimal Control Problems". Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics. 27 (3): 397–405. doi:10.2514/1.3426. S2CID 11140975.
  16. J. R. Rea, A Legendre Pseudospectral Method for Rapid Optimization of Launch Vehicle Trajectories, S.M. Thesis, Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2001. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/8608
  17. Josselyn, S.; Ross, I. M. (2003). "A Rapid Verification Method for the Trajectory Optimization of Reentry Vehicles". Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics. 26 (3): 505–508. Bibcode:2003JGCD...26..505J. doi:10.2514/2.5074. S2CID 14256785.
  18. Infeld, S. I. (2005). "Optimization of Mission Design for Constrained Libration Point Space Missions" (PDF). Stanford University. Bibcode:2006PhDT.........7I. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  19. Gong, Q.; Fahroo, F.; Ross, I. M. (2008). "A Spectral Algorithm for Pseudospectral Methods in Optimal Control". Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics. 31 (3): 460–471. Bibcode:2008JGCD...31..460G. doi:10.2514/1.32908. hdl:10945/56995.
  20. D. Delahaye, S. Puechmorel, P. Tsiotras, and E. Feron, "Mathematical Models for Aircraft Trajectory Design : A Survey" Lecture notes in Electrical Engineering, 2014, Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 290 (Part V), pp 205-247
  21. "NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)". ntrs.nasa.gov. Retrieved 2020-12-24.
  22. Karpenko, Mark; King, Jeffrey T.; Dennehy, Cornelius. J.; Michael Ross, I. (April 2019). "Agility Analysis of the James Webb Space Telescope". Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics. 42 (4): 810–821. doi:10.2514/1.g003816. ISSN 0731-5090.
  23. Karpenko, M. et al. "Fast Attitude Maneuvers for the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter." (2019) AAS 19-053.
  24. King, Jeffery T.; Karpenko, Mark (March 2016). "A simple approach for predicting time-optimal slew capability". Acta Astronautica. 120: 159–170. doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2015.12.009. ISSN 0094-5765.
  25. Karpenko, M., Ross, I. M., Stoneking, E. T., Lebsock, K. L., Dennehy, C., "A Micro-Slew Concept for Precision Pointing of the Kepler Spacecraft," AAS 15-628.
  26. S. E. Li, K. Deng, X. Zang, and Q. Zhang, "Pseudospectral Optimal Control of Constrained Nonlinear Systems," Ch 8, in Automotive Air Conditioning: Optimization, Control and Diagnosis, edited by Q. Zhang, S. E. Li and K. Deng, Springer 2016, pp. 145-166.
  27. Ross, I. M.; Proulx, R. J.; Karpenko, M. (July 2019). "Autonomous UAV Sensor Planning, Scheduling and Maneuvering: An Obstacle Engagement Technique". 2019 American Control Conference (ACC). IEEE. doi:10.23919/acc.2019.8814474. ISBN 978-1-5386-7926-5.
  28. "DIDO: Optimal control software". Promotional web page. Mathworks.
  29. Fahroo, F.; Doman, D. B.; Ngo, A. D. (2003). "Modeling Issues in Footprint Generation of Resuable Launch Vehicles". Proceedings of the IEEE Aerospace Conference. 6: 2791–2799. doi:10.1109/aero.2003.1235205. hdl:10945/41266. ISBN 978-0-7803-7651-9.
  30. "Elissar Global". web site. distributes the software.

Further reading
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.