Deficit round robin

In DRR, a scheduler handling N flows[lower-alpha 1] is configured with one quantum ${\displaystyle Q_{i}}$ for each flow. This global idea is that, at each round, the flow ${\displaystyle i}$ can send at most ${\displaystyle Q_{i}}$ bytes, and the remaining, if any, is reported to the next round. In this way, the flow of number i will achieve a minimal long term data rate of ${\displaystyle {\frac {Q_{i}}{(Q_{1}+Q_{2}+...+Q_{N})}}R}$, where ${\displaystyle R}$ is the link rate.

The DRR scans all non empty queues in sequence. When a non empty queue ${\displaystyle i}$ is selected, its deficit counter is incremented by its quantum value. Then, the value of the deficit counter is a maximal amount of bytes that can be sent at this turn: if the deficit counter is greater than the packet's size at the head of the queue (HoQ), this packet can be sent and the value of the counter is decremented by the packet size. Then, the size of the next packet is compared to the counter value, etc. Once the queue is empty or the value of the counter is insufficient, the scheduler will skip to the next queue. If the queue is empty, the value of the deficit counter is reset to 0.

Variables and Constants
    const integer N             // Nb of queues
    const integer Q[1..N]       // Per queue quantum 
    integer DC[1..N]            // Per queue deficit counter
    queue queue[1..N]           // The queues   

Scheduling Loop
while true do
    for i in 1..N do
        if not queue[i].empty() then
            DC[i]:= DC[i] + Q[i]
            while( not queue[i].empty() and
                         DC[i] ≥ queue[i].head().size() ) do
                DC[i] := DC[i] − queue[i].head().size()
                send( queue[i].head() )
                queue[i].dequeue()
            end while 
            if queue[i].empty() then
                DC[i] := 0
            end if
        end if
    end for
end while

Like other GPS-like scheduling algorithm, the choice of the weights is left to the network administrator.

Like WFQ, DRR offers a minimal rate to each flow whatever the size of the packets is. In weighted round robin scheduling, the fraction of bandwidth used depend on the packet's sizes.

Compared with WFQ scheduler that has complexity of O(log(n)) (n is the number of active flows/queues), the complexity of DRR is O(1), if the quantum ${\displaystyle Q_{i}}$ is larger than the maximum packet size of this flow. Nevertheless, this efficiency has a cost: the latency, i.e. the distance to the ideal GPS, is larger in DRR than in WFQ. [2]

An implementation of the deficit round robin algorithm was written by Patrick McHardy for the Linux kernel[3] and published under the GNU General Public License.

In Cisco and Juniper routers, modified versions of DRR are implemented: since the latency of DRR can be larger for some class of traffic, these modified versions give higher priority to some queues, whereas the others are served with the standard DRR algorithm.[4][5]

• Scheduling algorithm
• Fair Queuing
• Generalized processor sharing
• Weighted Fair Queuing
• Weighted round robin
• Fairness measure

• UC Berkeley EE122 lecture: Efficient fair queueing using deficit round robin