Donald B. Verrilli Jr.

Verrilli was born in New Rochelle, New York, in 1957[1] to Donald and Rose Marie Verrilli.[2]

Verrilli graduated from Wilton High School in Wilton, Connecticut, in 1975.[3]

He received his B.A. degree cum laude from Yale University (1979) and his J.D. degree with honors from Columbia Law School (1983), where he was editor-in-chief of the Columbia Law Review, a James Kent Scholar, and a Harlan Fiske Stone Scholar.[2][4]

Donald Verrilli at his Senate Judiciary Committee Confirmation Hearing March 30, 2011.

After graduating from law school, Verrilli served as law clerk to Judge J. Skelly Wright of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit from 1983 to 1984 and then for Associate Justice William J. Brennan Jr. of the U.S. Supreme Court from 1984 to 1985.[1]

Verrilli was a fellow at Columbia University Law School from 1985 to 1986,[1] where he is now a Lecturer in Law.[5] He then joined Ennis Friedman & Bersoff, in Washington, in 1986.[1] then joined Jenner & Block LLP, in 1988, as an associate, and eventually became a partner.[1] While working at Jenner & Block, Verrilli also was an adjunct professor at American University's Washington College of Law (spring 1995) and Georgetown University Law Center (from 1992 to 2008).[1]

At Jenner & Block, Verrilli specialized in telecommunications, media and First Amendment law. In 2005, he represented the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) before the Supreme Court in MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.. In 2007, he represented Viacom in Viacom International Inc. v. YouTube, Inc.. During the same year, he also represented RIAA in Capitol v. Thomas and opposed the retrial of the case.[6][7]

Verrilli was appointed by President Barack Obama to become an Associate Deputy Attorney General at the U.S. Department of Justice and served in this post from February 2009 to January 2010.[1] In February 2010, Verrilli joined the Office of White House Counsel as a senior and deputy counsel to the president.[1]

By 2012, Verrilli had participated in more than 100 cases before the Supreme Court, and given oral argument in seventeen of those.[8] In addition to Grokster, these include two pro bono cases that were notable in the area of defendants rights. In Wiggins v. Smith, Verrilli successfully argued that his client had been denied effective assistance of counsel. In Montejo v. Louisiana, he unsuccessfully argued that his client's Sixth Amendment rights had been violated when he was questioned after having counsel appointed for him.

On January 26, 2011, President Obama nominated Verrilli to succeed Elena Kagan as Solicitor General of the United States.[9][10][11] On May 12, 2011, the United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary voted 17-1 to forward Verrilli's nomination to the full Senate.[12]

On May 26, 2011, Senate Democrats filed for cloture on Verrilli's nomination. A cloture vote was withdrawn right before it was scheduled. Instead, the Senate on June 6 proceeded straight to an up-or-down vote on Verrilli's nomination.[13] Senators then confirmed Verrilli in a 72–16 vote.[14] Verrilli was sworn in on June 9, 2011,[15] and became the 46th Solicitor General.[16] He finished his position in June 2016; his final day on the job was Friday, June 25.[17]

On March 26, 27 and 28, 2012, Verrilli argued the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act before the Supreme Court. His performance on the 27th, the first involving substantive arguments regarding the constitutionality of the PPACA, was widely panned as a "disaster" for the Obama administration.[18][19][20][21] However, he was vindicated on June 28, 2012, when the court ruled that the individual mandate and most of the Act was constitutional,[22][23] albeit as a tax and not as an exercise of Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause. His oral arguments were praised by some who remarked that "court arguments are not television anchor tryouts; they’re about the merits of an argument, and a review of the transcript of the oral arguments from that day (with the benefit of hindsight, of course) finds Verrilli made a strong case for the government’s taxing power."[24] CNN legal commentator Jeffrey Toobin, one of Verrilli's strongest critics, apologized on-air and said "This is a day for Don Verrilli to take an enormous amount of credit, and for me to eat a bit of crow, because he won, and everyone should know that that argument was a winning argument, whatever you thought of it."[25]

After hearing his arguments in Shelby County v. Holder, Lincoln Caplan of The New York Times called Verrilli a "lawyer's lawyer" and said that he "isn't showy, but he is a deeply experienced and capable advocate who finds ways to make technical legal arguments that persuade a majority of justices. While he's not inspiring, he's often effective."[26]

In early June 2016, Verrilli announced that he would step down as solicitor general; Verrilli is the seventh longest serving solicitor general in U.S. history.[27]

According to the Oyez Project, Verrilli has argued the following cases before the Supreme Court:[4]

• Texas v. California (2020)[28]
• Intel Corp. Investment Policy Committee v. Sulyma (2019)
• Jam v. International Finance Corp. (2018)
• United States v. Texas (2016)
• Obergefell v. Hodges (2015)
• Michigan v. Environmental Protection Agency (2015)
• King v. Burwell (2015)
• Texas Dept. of Housing and Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project, Inc. (2015)
• Young v. United Parcel Service, Inc. (2015)
• Alabama Legislative Black Caucus v. Alabama (2015)
• Zivotofsky v. Kerry (2015)
• Alice Corporation v. CLS Bank International (2014)
• Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores (2014)
• Utility Air Regulatory Group v. Environmental Protection Agency (2014)
• Harris v. Quinn (2014)
• National Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning (2014)
• Bond v. United States (2014)
• McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission (2014)
• Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics (2013)
• United States v. Windsor (2013)
• Hollingsworth v. Perry (2013)
• Shelby County v. Holder (2013)
• City of Arlington, TX v. FCC (2013)
• Clapper v. Amnesty International USA (2013)
• Fisher v. University of Texas (2013)
• Arizona v. United States (2012)
• National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius (2012)
• Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum (2013)
• United States v. Alvarez (2012)
• FCC v. Fox Television Stations (2012)
• Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. (2012)
• Zivotofsky v. Clinton (2012)
• Golan v. Holder (2012)
• Montejo v. Louisiana (2009)
• Baze and Bowling v. Rees (2008)
• Schriro v. Landrigan (2007)
• Howard Delivery Service v. Zurich American Insurance Company (2006)
• MGM Studios v. Grokster (2005)
• General Dynamics Land Systems Inc. v. Cline (2004)
• Verizon v. Trinko, LLP (2004)
• Wiggins v. Smith (2003)
• FCC v. Nextwave Communications, Inc. (2003)
• Verizon Communications v. FCC (2002)
• Lonchar v. Thomas (1996)
• MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. (1994)
• United States v. Juvenile Male (2011)

In 1988, Verrilli married Gail W. Laster,[2] who is director of the Office of Consumer Protection at the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA). They have one daughter.[29]

• Donald Verrilli nomination information, U.S. Senate
• Don Verrilli at whorunsgov.com
• Appearances on C-SPAN