Emergo (board game)

Emergo has two players, Black and White. A 'piece' is defined as a column of one or more men. Columns may consist of all white pieces, all black pieces, white with black prisoners, or black with white prisoners. The top man is called the cap, with all the pieces underneath as prisoners. The color of the cap determines the piece's owner.

Capture occurs by jumping an opponent's piece and landing on the square beyond, which must be vacant for the capture to take place. When a piece is captured, rather than being removed from the game, it is placed beneath the capturing piece as a prisoner. Over the course of the game this results in a decrease in the total number of pieces in play, while the remaining pieces "climb upwards" as they grow taller. If an opponent's cap is captured, revealing the prisoner underneath, the prisoner becomes the new cap and the color signifies the owner. Capture may occur in any direction except by making a 180° turn.

Emergo has two phases to the game. The first is the entering phase and the second is the movement phase.[5]

Emergo had its origins in a conversation between Ed van Zon and Christian Freeling when van Zon introduced him to a game called Stapeldammen, which he asserted had "very beautiful things" happening in it. Freeling had been vaguely familiar with Stapeldammen, although he knew it by the name of "Indian draughts", but had never been particularly interested in the concept.[8] Stapeldammen is a column checkers game, alongside Bashni and Lasca, adapted to a 10×10 board and utilizes many familiar concepts from International draughts. It lacks only International draughts’ rules regarding promotion and the prohibition on jumping over the same piece twice. When a man reaches the other side of the board, because pieces are not promoted, it is forced to stay there unless it has a backwards capture available to it.[9]

Freeling says that "Ed saw what I had failed to see: there was beauty flickering through the chaotic proceedings in the game. Using thin backgammon men he had me convinced in minutes."[8] Freeling, however, was not so convinced that Stapeldammen's lack of promotion served the game well, and had similar reservations about using international draught's promotion rules. He eventually decided that the problem was not the lack of promotion, but the concept of an initial position and forward direction. He says, "In checkers terms, all men should be Kings to begin with."[8] This abandonment of forward direction and an initial position was the beginning of Emergo as a concept.

Freeling suggested an "entering phase" to van Zon and they played around with concept creating what they would later call an "all kings lasca". In this early rendition of Emergo there were no rules regarding entering a piece other than that capture, if possible, took precedence over entering a man. They began playing this way and immendiately ran into an issue.

So we started putting men on the board in our first game, using no other rules than entering a man if not obliged to capture, and capturing in all directions. The movement stage would thus turn into an 'all kings Lasca'. Soon Ed had sneakily managed an anchorman waiting to capture a particular piece that he started feeding[lower-alpha 1] around the board. It followed his lead compulsory, like a dog. He eventually liberated a column of ten or thereabouts, and I was still stuck with a similar pile of men in hand - what later would be coined the 'shadowpiece'.[8]

They decided that a phase where one player had all of their men on the board while the other player still had most of their pieces in hand was "unsatisfactory".[8] They decided that if a player had placed all of their pieces on the board, then the other player could enter all the pieces remaining in their hand at once.

They played using this entering rule for roughly an hour, but felt that the entering phase still lacked a "solidity" and was too dominated by tactical considerations rather than long term strategic ones.

They decided that the problem was ultimately in the feeding tactics, which prevented strong positions from arising for either side as a result of the entering tactics by the other player. They decided to restrict the freedom of the other player to force feeding and instead let it be the result of the entering decision of the other player. This gave the entering phase the current restrictions on placements that force a player to capture a man, and gave it the strategic solidity they were looking for.

The last pieces of the puzzle were the realization that the two players, Black and White had slightly different goals and priorities during the entering phase, resulting in the rule restricting white's first placement, and the board size.

They settled on a 9×9 board because of its odd number of squares and elimination of tric-trac corners.[8]

• Emergo initially had two versions, the standard game played on a 9×9 square board and a hexagonal variant consisting of 37 hex cells. The latter, known as Hexemergo, was abandoned after play testing because of a winning strategy that was found in correspondence play.[10] The square version does not suffer from a similar problem.[4]
• Of all the games he has created, Emergo is Christian Freeling's personal favourite.[11]
• Emergo has a game tree complexity of ~10^104[12]
• The feel of Emergo's gameplay has been described as "wrestling" in comparison to Bushka's[13] "karate" or Dameo's "judo".[14]
• Freeling and van Zon claim the internal logic of Emergo is such that its less an invention and more of a "discovery" of a pre-existing reality.[4]

• Emergo on Mindsports – contains links to rules, history, and strategy, as well as the possibility of turn-based play
• Emergo at BoardGameGeek