Entropic gravity

The thermodynamic description of gravity has a history that goes back at least to research on black hole thermodynamics by Bekenstein and Hawking in the mid-1970s. These studies suggest a deep connection between gravity and thermodynamics, which describes the behavior of heat. In 1995, Jacobson demonstrated that the Einstein field equations describing relativistic gravitation can be derived by combining general thermodynamic considerations with the equivalence principle.[1] Subsequently, other physicists, most notably Thanu Padmanabhan, began to explore links between gravity and entropy.[2][3]

In 2009, Erik Verlinde proposed a conceptual model that describes gravity as an entropic force.[4] He argues (similar to Jacobson's result) that gravity is a consequence of the "information associated with the positions of material bodies".[5] This model combines the thermodynamic approach to gravity with Gerard 't Hooft's holographic principle. It implies that gravity is not a fundamental interaction, but an emergent phenomenon which arises from the statistical behavior of microscopic degrees of freedom encoded on a holographic screen. The paper drew a variety of responses from the scientific community. Andrew Strominger, a string theorist at Harvard said "Some people have said it can't be right, others that it's right and we already knew it – that it’s right and profound, right and trivial."[6]

In July 2011, Verlinde presented the further development of his ideas in a contribution to the Strings 2011 conference, including an explanation for the origin of dark matter.[7]

Verlinde's article also attracted a large amount of media exposure,[8][9] and led to immediate follow-up work in cosmology,[10][11] the dark energy hypothesis,[12] cosmological acceleration,[13][14] cosmological inflation,[15] and loop quantum gravity.[16] Also, a specific microscopic model has been proposed that indeed leads to entropic gravity emerging at large scales.[17] Entropic gravity can emerge from quantum entanglement of local Rindler horizons.[18]

The law of gravitation is derived from classical statistical mechanics applied to the holographic principle, that states that the description of a volume of space can be thought of as ${\displaystyle N}$ bits of binary information, encoded on a boundary to that region, a closed surface of area ${\displaystyle A}$. The information is evenly distributed on the surface with each bit requiring an area equal to ${\displaystyle \ell _{\text{P}}^{2}}$, the so-called Planck area, from which ${\displaystyle N}$ can thus be computed:

${\displaystyle N={\frac {A}{\ell _{\text{P}}^{2}}}}$

where ${\displaystyle \ell _{\text{P}}}$ is the Planck length. The Planck length is defined as:

${\displaystyle \ell _{\text{P}}={\sqrt {\frac {\hbar G}{c^{3}}}}}$

where ${\displaystyle G}$ is the universal gravitational constant, ${\displaystyle c}$ is the speed of light, and ${\displaystyle \hbar }$ is the reduced Planck constant. When substituted in the equation for ${\displaystyle N}$ we find:

${\displaystyle N={\frac {Ac^{3}}{\hbar G}}}$

The statistical equipartition theorem defines the temperature ${\displaystyle T}$ of a system with ${\displaystyle N}$ degrees of freedom in terms of its energy ${\displaystyle E}$ such that:

${\displaystyle E={\frac {1}{2}}Nk_{\text{B}}T}$

where ${\displaystyle k_{\text{B}}}$ is the Boltzmann constant. This is the equivalent energy for a mass ${\displaystyle M}$ according to:

${\displaystyle E=Mc^{2}}$.

The effective temperature experienced due to a uniform acceleration in a vacuum field according to the Unruh effect is:

${\displaystyle T={\frac {\hbar a}{2\pi ck_{\text{B}}}}}$,

where ${\displaystyle a}$ is that acceleration, which for a mass ${\displaystyle m}$ would be attributed to a force ${\displaystyle F}$ according to Newton's second law of motion:

${\displaystyle F=ma}$.

Taking the holographic screen to be a sphere of radius ${\displaystyle r}$, the surface area would be given by:

${\displaystyle A=4\pi r^{2}}$.

From algebraic substitution of these into the above relations, one derives Newton's law of universal gravitation:

${\displaystyle F=m{\frac {2\pi ck_{\text{B}}T}{\hbar }}=m{\frac {4\pi c}{\hbar }}{\frac {E}{N}}=m{\frac {4\pi c^{3}}{\hbar }}{\frac {M}{N}}=m4\pi {\frac {GM}{A}}=G{\frac {mM}{r^{2}}}}$.

Note that this derivation assumes that the number of the binary bits of information is equal to the number of the degrees of freedom.

${\displaystyle {\frac {A}{\ell _{\text{P}}^{2}}}=N={\frac {2E}{k_{\text{B}}T}}}$

Entropic gravity, as proposed by Verlinde in his original article, reproduces the Einstein field equations and, in a Newtonian approximation, a 1/r potential for gravitational forces. Since its results do not differ from Newtonian gravity except in regions of extremely small gravitational fields, testing the theory with earth-based laboratory experiments does not appear feasible. Spacecraft-based experiments performed at Lagrangian points within our solar system would be expensive and challenging.

Even so, entropic gravity in its current form has been severely challenged on formal grounds. Matt Visser has shown[19] that the attempt to model conservative forces in the general Newtonian case (i.e. for arbitrary potentials and an unlimited number of discrete masses) leads to unphysical requirements for the required entropy and involves an unnatural number of temperature baths of differing temperatures. Visser concludes:

There is no reasonable doubt concerning the physical reality of entropic forces, and no reasonable doubt that classical (and semi-classical) general relativity is closely related to thermodynamics [52–55]. Based on the work of Jacobson [1–6], Thanu Padmanabhan [7–12], and others, there are also good reasons to suspect a thermodynamic interpretation of the fully relativistic Einstein equations might be possible. Whether the specific proposals of Verlinde [26] are anywhere near as fundamental is yet to be seen – the rather baroque construction needed to accurately reproduce n-body Newtonian gravity in a Verlinde-like setting certainly gives one pause.

For the derivation of Einstein's equations from an entropic gravity perspective, Tower Wang shows[20] that the inclusion of energy-momentum conservation and cosmological homogeneity and isotropy requirements severely restrict a wide class of potential modifications of entropic gravity, some of which have been used to generalize entropic gravity beyond the singular case of an entropic model of Einstein's equations. Wang asserts that:

As indicated by our results, the modified entropic gravity models of form (2), if not killed, should live in a very narrow room to assure the energy-momentum conservation and to accommodate a homogeneous isotropic universe.

Cosmological observations using available technology can be used to test the theory. On the basis of lensing by the galaxy cluster Abell 1689, Nieuwenhuizen concludes that EG is strongly ruled out unless additional (dark) matter like eV neutrinos is added.[21] A team from Leiden Observatory statistically observing the lensing effect of gravitational fields at large distances from the centers of more than 33,000 galaxies, found that those gravitational fields were consistent with Verlinde's theory.[22][23][24] Using conventional gravitational theory, the fields implied by these observations (as well as from measured galaxy rotation curves) could only be ascribed to a particular distribution of dark matter. In June 2017, a study by Princeton University researcher Kris Pardo asserted that Verlinde's theory is inconsistent with the observed rotation velocities of dwarf galaxies.[25][26]

Sabine Hossenfelder argues that "one should interpret these studies [comparing dark matter gravitational studies with EG] with caution" because "approximations must be made to arrive at [the to be tested EG] equation[s]" and it's not yet clear that the approximations are themselves correct.[27]

In 2018, Zhi-Wei Wang and Samuel L. Braunstein showed that, while spacetime surfaces near black holes (called stretched horizons) do obey an analog of the first law of thermodynamics, ordinary spacetime surfaces — including holographic screens — generally do not, thus undermining the key thermodynamic assumption of the emergent gravity program.[28]

• It from bit – Entropic gravity for pedestrians, J. Koelman
• Gravity: the inside story, T Padmanabhan
• Experiments Show Gravity Is Not an Emergent Phenomenon