FTC v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.
Federal Trade Commission v. Colgate-Palmolive Company, 380 U.S. 374 (1965), was a United States Supreme Court case.
| Federal Trade Commission v. Colgate-Palmolive Company | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued December 10, 1964 Decided April 5th, 1965 | |
| Full case name | Federal Trade Commission v. Colgate-Palmolive Company |
| Citations | 380 U.S. 374 (more) 85 S. Ct. 1035; 13 L. Ed. 2d 904; 1965 U.S. LEXIS 2300 |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Warren, joined by Black, Douglas, Clark, Brennan, White, Goldberg |
| Concur/dissent | Harlan, joined by Stewart |
Background
A Colgate-Palmolive advertisement claimed that its Palmolive Rapid Shave shaving cream was so good it could be used to shave sandpaper. The commercial showed sandpaper applied with shaving cream and then shaved.
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) complained that the ad was deceptive and a material misrepresentation because it was not sandpaper but rather sand sprinkled on glass. Colgate-Palmolive argued that the product really could shave sandpaper if left on long enough. Colgate-Palmolive sued arguing that the FTC had overstepped its authority.
Opinion of the Court
The Supreme Court agreed with the FTC that the commercial was a material misrepresentation. The ruling forced advertisers to remain truthful in their product presentations. As a result, commercials often feature "dramatization" notifications.
External links
- Text of Federal Trade Commission v. Colgate-Palmolive Company, 380 U.S. 374 (1965) is available from: CourtListener Google Scholar Justia Library of Congress Oyez (oral argument audio)
- The Sandpaper Test, Museum of Hoaxes
