Fondul Proprietatea

Romania is a country of the former Eastern Soviet bloc where a very large number of properties (factories, enterprises, houses, apartments, buildings, churches and lands) have been nationalised by the communist government. The state would appropriate by decrees, the most important being decree nr 92 of 1950,[1] more than 400,000 buildings, around 150,000 of them having been demolished during the following 40 years.[2] In 1995, under the presidency of Ion Iliescu, a law [3] allowed tenants to buy from the Romanian State, at very low cost, real estates built before 1945 that had been nationalised, thus preventing previous owners from recovering those properties. The complex legal situation that has resulted has led to an attempt to compensate the former owners, to whom the state was unable to restore previous property, through the foundation of the Proprietatea fund. Figures between 150,000 and 250,000 concerned property owners - only for real estate - are frequently used by associations or newspapers but no verifiable official statistic is available.

Created on November 24, 2005 by law 247/2005 [4] in Romania, Fondul Proprietatea or Property fund is a fund that collects a part of the debts that other countries owe to Romania. It also contains shares of certain state companies.

The distributed shares constitute reparations to the owners (or descendants) whose properties had been nationalised between 1945 and 1989 and were unable to recover their properties after 1989 due to various causes.

According to the website site of the fund,[5] Romania would be the only eastern country trying to compensate at a fair value the people who have been dispossessed by the communist regime.

S.C. Fondul “Proprietatea ” S.A. was established to assure the financial resources necessary to compensate the persons abusively expropriated. The compensation is made in shares, representing the actual value of the real estates which are not given back in kind. Following the fulfillment of some strictly law determined stages, the titleholders of the rights of compensation will become shareholders of Fondul Proprietatea.

• Fondul Proprietatea is a joint stock company, established in accordance with the provisions of Title VII of law 247/2005,[4] GOVERNMENTAL DECISION 1481/2005 and of Law no. 31/1990. Fondul Proprietatea is a corporate body from the registration date at the Trade Register Office besides the Court of Bucharest.
• It is a private fund which does not get any finance from the State budget. However, until very recently, its management and board was chosen by the Government of Romania.
• The main objective is to create profit for its shareholders.
• Means to achieve this objective: judicial administration of the assets.
• Last available information on the portfolio (June 2009):

- 88 companies in portfolio.

- Subscribed social capital: 13,652,546,092 RON.

- Number of shareholders: 2,471 private shareholders; their shares represent 33,99 % of the capital. The Main shareholder is the Economy and Finance Minister.

• The initial share capital has been constitute with funds resulted from:

- debts cashing

- recovery of some rights of Romania, which arise from commercial and international cooperation agreements

- the activity of some of the state shares alienation, held at a series of commercial companies.

• Share capital will be gradually increased, according as the cashing of these amounts, as well as by reference to the estimated value of the compensations granted.
• The nominal value of a shares issued by Fondul Proprietatea is 1 RON. The unique initial shareholder is the Romanian State.

Until the appointment of a selected administration, the fund has been managed provisionally by the Ministry of Public Finance through the Board of Supervisors. After selecting through an international public tender, a management company will take over the powers of the administrator of the Fund property. Following a tender selection process, a Selection Commission has recently designed "on June 9, 2009 Franklin Templeton Investment Management Ltd as the manager of the fund."[7]

• On 31 October 2019[8]

By the end of December 2008, the portfolio total value was evaluated around 16,498,879,195 RON (5,497,793,800 USD or 3,911,350,421 €). In June 2009, the available information regarding 90% of the portfolio value is as follows:

• Stock-Exchange (Bucharest) listed Companies:

• Unlisted companies:

• The shares issued by Fondul Proprietatea will be transferred, free of charge, to the titleholders of compensation issued on the date of the Fund establishment, to their subsequent holders, or to the persons compensated by the decisions issued after the establishment of the fund. The number of the shares transferred will be set by reference to the value of the compensation securities held.
• The shares of Fondul Proprietatea will be freely sold by their titleholders, on regulated markets. For this purpose, Fondul Proprietatea will initiate the legal procedure to admit the shares for transaction on the market operated by Bucharest Stock Exchange. By the capitalization of the shares - either by their sale, or by receiving annual dividends resulted from the activity developed by Fondul Proprietatea -, the effective compensation will be accomplished for the former owners of the nationalized real estates, which could not be given back in kind.

• The fund has been experiencing serious management difficulties, delays [9] and scandals [10] since its creation. This fund is also widely disputed by the beneficiaries and all owners associations,[11] considering it is not a real compensation scheme since the shares cannot be properly sold on the market and that it is insufficient in size.[12] It has been also criticized by the press, the civil society or political parties in Romania.[13] It appears [14] that the fund is still not in a position to compensate anyone,[15] mainly because it cannot be floated in the financial market and for the weak amount of money that the Romanian State makes available for the fund.[16] In 2009, according to many newspapers and commentators, the image of the fund and of the State of Romania has been seriously tarnished by the long series of issues and failures.[17]
• In fact, the fund has been liquid for the victims only once, for a very limited amount: 500,000 Lei (around 166,500 USD or 118,778.80 Euros) for each owner, whatever the extent of injury, and for a very limited time (within 6 months from 1 October 2007 [18] ). It allows only rarely the compensation of the deprivation of property. Many of the former owners die [19] before receiving any compensation.
• The European Court of Human Rights (or ECHR) has repeatedly condemned [20] Romania [21] for its failure to return the real estates, but also to pay for compensation. In November 2009, it is still not considered by the European Court of Human Rights as an acceptable means of compensating the confiscations.[22] According to the Romanian newspaper Ziua, the refusal of Romania to change its legislation in order to make effective the restitution of confiscated properties, or to offer a swift and decent compensation, led the ECHR to threaten Romania of an outright exclusion of the organization (21 May 2009).[23] On 21 October 2009, the newspaper Evenimentul Zilei [24] dedicates a long article of the never ending condemnations of Romania, considered by the ECHR unable to compensate dispossessed owners. Romania has lost more than 100 trials since 2007, and had to pay nearly 18 million euros in damages awarded by the Court to the plaintiffs.

• It can also be noted that the Council of Europe [25] states that a systemic problem in Romania due to the mechanism of the fund. The Committee of Ministers [26] has regularly highlighted a deficiency regarding the respect of private property right. The Committee emphasizes particularly the lack of compensation following the deprivation of property, which amounts to confirm the ineffectiveness of Fondul Proprietatea.
  Thus at its last meeting on June 6, 2009,[27] the ministers states on the basis of the 88 cases involving the absence of restitution or compensation for nationalized property, subsequently resold by the State to others:[28]
  1. recall that the issues raised in these cases relate to a major systemic problem, particularly related to the absence of restitution or compensation for nationalized property, subsequently resold by the state to others, a problem that must be addressed as quickly as possible to avoid a significant number of new, similar violations;
  2. note that the European Court in a number of cases that have recently become final, said, inter alia, that the Romanian authorities should take the necessary legislative measures to prevent the occurrence of situations where two titles related to the same property coexist, and also amend the administrative mechanism established by the laws of repair [4] so that it becomes really coherent, accessible, timely and predictable;
  3. invite the Romanian authorities to submit an action plan on measures taken or envisaged to improve the current mechanism of restitution;; in this context they noted with interest that bilateral consultations are envisaged between the authorities involved in the process restitution and the Secretariat;
  5. consequently decide to resume consideration of these matters at the latest af their 1st HR meeting in 2010 in the light of the action plan and to provide information on individual measures.

Romania is the only country in the former Eastern bloc to join the European union where such a problem concerning the situation of property in connection with the collapse of communist regimes remains unresolved. None of the other ex-Soviet bloc countries have raised a real estate issue with such a magnitude at European level.

Given the seriousness of the situation and the inertia of the Romanian state, despite hundreds of convictions of the European Court of Human Rights, the latter launched on 25 February 2010 a pilot-judgment procedure.[29] The hearing was held 6 September 2010.[30] The ruling is expected in September 2010. It could be accompanied by sanctions against Romania such as the obligation to amend its legislation, or the exclusion of the Court.

• Fondul Proprietatea S.A. (Societate pe Aciuni - stock company)
• (in Romanian) National Authority for the Restitution of Properties
• European Court of Human Rights: direct access to the jurisprudence of judgments. A ranking by countries allows to find quickly the recent judgments concerning Romania and find a jurisprudence on the subject.
• Romanian Academy Society (English version)