Gompertz function

The halfway point is found by solving ${\textstyle f(t)=a/2}$ for t.

$${\displaystyle t_{hwp}=-{\frac {\ln(\ln(2)/b)}{c}}}$$

The point of maximum rate of increase (${\textstyle 0.368a}$) is found by solving ${\textstyle {\frac {d^{2}}{dt^{2}}}f(t)=0}$ for t.

$${\displaystyle t_{max}=\ln(b)/c}$$

The increase at ${\textstyle t_{max}}$ is

$${\displaystyle \max \left({\frac {d}{df}}\right)={\frac {ac}{e}}}$$

The function curve can be derived from a Gompertz law of mortality, which states the rate of absolute mortality (decay) falls exponentially with current size. Mathematically,

$${\displaystyle k^{r}\propto {\frac {1}{y(t)}}}$$

where

• ${\textstyle r={\frac {y'(t)}{y(t)}}}$ is the rate of growth
• k is an arbitrary constant.

Population biology is especially concerned with the Gompertz function. This function is especially useful in describing the rapid growth of a certain population of organisms while also being able to account for the eventual horizontal asymptote, once the carrying capacity is determined (plateau cell/population number).

It is modeled as follows:

$${\displaystyle N(t)=N_{0}\exp(\ln(N_{I}/N_{0})(1-\exp(-bt)))}$$

where:

• t is time
• N₀ is the initial amount of cells
• N_I is the plateau cell/population number
• b is the initial rate of tumor growth

This function consideration of the plateau cell number makes it useful in accurately mimicking real-life population dynamics. The function also adheres to the sigmoid function, which is the most widely accepted convention of generally detailing a population's growth. Moreover, the function makes use of initial growth rate, which is commonly seen in populations of bacterial and cancer cells, which undergo the log phase and grow rapidly in numbers. Despite its popularity, the function initial rate of tumor growth is difficult to predetermine given the varying microcosms present with a patient, or varying environmental factors in the case of population biology. In cancer patients, factors such as age, diet, ethnicity, genetic pre-dispositions, metabolism, lifestyle and origin of metastasis play a role in determining the tumor growth rate. The carrying capacity is also expected to change based on these factors, and so describing such phenomena is difficult.

The metabolic function is particularly concerned with accounting for the rate of metabolism within an organism. This function can be applied to monitor tumor cells; metabolic rate is dynamic and is greatly flexible, making it more precise in detailing cancer growth. The metabolic curve takes in to consideration the energy the body provides in maintaining and creating tissue. This energy can be considered as metabolism and follows a specific pattern in cellular division. Energy conservation can be used to model such growth, irrespective of differing masses and development times. All taxa share a similar growth pattern and this model, as a result, considers cellular division, the foundation of the development of a tumor.

$${\displaystyle B=\sum _{C}(N_{C}B_{C})+\left(E_{C}{\operatorname {d} \!N_{C} \over \operatorname {d} \!t}\right)}$$

• B = energy organism uses at rest
• N_C = number of cells in the given organism
• B_C= metabolic rate of an individual cell
• N_CB_C= energy required to maintain the existing tissue
• E_C= energy required to create new tissue from an individual cell

The differentiation between energy used at rest and metabolic rate work allows for the model to more precisely determine the rate of growth. The energy at rest is lower than the energy used to maintain a tissue, and together represent the energy required to maintain the existing tissue. The use of these two factors, alongside the energy required to create new tissue, comprehensively map the rate of growth, and moreover, lead in to an accurate representation of the lag phase.

In the 1960s A.K. Laird[11] for the first time successfully used the Gompertz curve to fit data of growth of tumors. In fact, tumors are cellular populations growing in a confined space where the availability of nutrients is limited. Denoting the tumor size as X(t) it is useful to write the Gompertz Curve as follows:

${\displaystyle X(t)=K\exp \left(\log \left({\frac {X(0)}{K}}\right)\exp \left(-\alpha t\right)\right)}$

where:

• X(0) is the tumor size at the starting observation time;
• K is the carrying capacity, i.e. the maximum size that can be reached with the available nutrients. In fact it is:
  $${\displaystyle \lim _{t\rightarrow +\infty }X(t)=K}$$

  

independently on X(0)>0. Note that, in absence of therapies etc.. usually it is X(0)<K, whereas, in presence of therapies, it may be X(0)>K;

• α is a constant related to the proliferative ability of the cells.
• log() refers to the natural log.

It is easy to verify that the dynamics of X(t) is governed by the Gompertz differential equation:

$${\displaystyle X^{\prime }(t)=\alpha \log \left({\frac {K}{X(t)}}\right)X(t)}$$

i.e. is of the form when broken down:

$${\displaystyle X^{\prime }(t)=F\left(X(t)\right)X(t),\quad {\mbox{with}}\quad F^{\prime }(X)\leq 0,}$$

F(X) is the instantaneous proliferation rate of the cellular population, whose decreasing nature is due to the competition for the nutrients due to the increase of the cellular population, similarly to the logistic growth rate. However, there is a fundamental difference: in the logistic case the proliferation rate for small cellular population is finite:

$${\displaystyle F(X)=\alpha \left(1-\left({\frac {X}{K}}\right)^{\nu }\right)\Rightarrow F(0)=\alpha <+\infty }$$

whereas in the Gompertz case the proliferation rate is unbounded:

$${\displaystyle \lim _{X\rightarrow 0^{+}}F(X)=\lim _{X\rightarrow 0^{+}}\alpha \log \left({\frac {K}{X}}\right)=+\infty }$$

As noticed by Steel[12] and by Wheldon,[13] the proliferation rate of the cellular population is ultimately bounded by the cell division time. Thus, this might be an evidence that the Gompertz equation is not good to model the growth of small tumors. Moreover, more recently it has been noticed[14] that, including the interaction with immune system, Gompertz and other laws characterized by unbounded F(0) would preclude the possibility of immune surveillance.

The theoretical study by Fornalski et al. [15] showed the biophysical basis of the Gompertz curve for cancer growth except very early phase where parabolic function is more appropriate. They found also that the Gompertz curve describes the most typical case among the broad family of the cancer dynamics’ functions.

The Gompertz differential equation

$${\displaystyle X^{\prime }(t)=\alpha \log \left({\frac {K}{X(t)}}\right)X(t)}$$

is the limiting case of the generalized logistic differential equation

$${\displaystyle X^{\prime }(t)=\alpha \nu \left(1-\left({\frac {X(t)}{K}}\right)^{\frac {1}{\nu }}\right)X(t)}$$

(where ${\displaystyle \nu >0}$ is a positive real number) since

$${\displaystyle \lim _{\nu \rightarrow +\infty }\nu \left(1-x^{1/\nu }\right)=-\log \left(x\right)}$$

.

In addition, there is an inflection point in the graph of the generalized logistic function when

$${\displaystyle X(t)=\left({\frac {\nu }{\nu +1}}\right)^{\nu }K}$$

and one in the graph of the Gompertz function when

$${\displaystyle X(t)={\frac {K}{e}}=K\cdot \lim _{\nu \rightarrow +\infty }\left({\frac {\nu }{\nu +1}}\right)^{\nu }}$$

.

Based on the above considerations, Wheldon[13] proposed a mathematical model of tumor growth, called the Gomp-Ex model, that slightly modifies the Gompertz law. In the Gomp-Ex model it is assumed that initially there is no competition for resources, so that the cellular population expands following the exponential law. However, there is a critical size threshold ${\displaystyle X_{C}}$ such that for ${\displaystyle X>X_{C}}$. The assumption that there is no competition for resources holds true in most scenarios. It can however be affected by limiting factors, that requires the creation of sub-factors variables.

the growth follows the Gompertz Law:

$${\displaystyle F(X)=\max \left(a,\alpha \log \left({\frac {K}{X}}\right)\right)}$$

so that:

$${\displaystyle X_{C}=K\exp \left(-{\frac {a}{\alpha }}\right).}$$

Here there are some numerical estimates[13] for ${\displaystyle X_{C}}$:

• ${\textstyle X_{C}\approx 10^{9}}$ for human tumors
• ${\textstyle X_{C}\approx 10^{6}}$ for murine (mouse) tumors