Great Belt Bridge rail accident

The railway on the West Bridge, as viewed towards Sprogø and the East Bridge. The passenger train was on the southern track to the right; the freight train on the northern track to the left.

Due to Storm Alfrida,[1] which hit Denmark on 1 January 2019, the Danish Road Directorate closed the Great Belt Bridge for all road traffic on the night between 1 and 2 January. It was expected to reopen at 11:00 on 2 January.[4] Rail traffic was not restricted.[5] Both road and rail traffic travel by the West Bridge, a low box girder bridge, but the more wind-exposed East Bridge, a suspension bridge, is only for road traffic, as trains here travel by tunnel.[6]

At 07:11, InterCity express ICL 210 departed from Odense headed for Copenhagen. Operated by DSB, it was carrying 131 passengers and a crew of three when it arrived at the western end of the bridge.[7][8] Meanwhile, a freight train operated by DB Cargo with a crew of one,[9] loaded with semi-trailers carrying crates of empty bottles belonging to Carlsberg, was heading in the opposite direction[5] towards the Carlsberg brewery at Fredericia, 72 kilometres (45 mi) to the north west of the crash site.[10]

Shortly before 07:35,[7][11] on the West Bridge of the Great Belt Fixed Link, between the islands of Sprogø and Funen, the passenger train collided with an object initially believed to be a tarpaulin from the freight train,[8] but later that same day identified by Accident Investigation Board Denmark to be an empty semi-trailer from the freight train.[12] The train driver has since said that he noticed sparks lower than usual (i.e. not from the overhead catenary) and that "something big" was hanging from the approaching freight train.[13][14]

The storm and the location of the accident complicated the emergency operation.[1][15] Initially, six casualties were confirmed while the trains were still on the bridge, but after they had been moved to a secluded area, two more bodies were found in the passenger train.[16] Both in relation to the accident and the ongoing storm, the government crisis management organization, the National Operative Staff (NOST) decided to convene.[17]

Eight passengers were killed, five women and three men, and 16 were injured in the accident.[18] None of the wounded had life-threatening injuries: 14 had minor injuries, and 2 had moderate injuries.[19] On 4 January, all victims had been identified as Danish citizens, between 27 and 60 years old.[20]

The bridge reopened for road traffic at approximately 12:20 on 2 January. Later that afternoon, the westbound carriageway was briefly closed due to queueing by curious drivers.[21] Rail traffic was restarted at 10:40 on 3 January, when one track opened,[22] and all traffic was normal by the evening.[23]

The investigation was handled by the Accident Investigation Board Denmark.[24] On 2 January, shortly after the accident, investigator Bo Haaning said the accident was caused by a collision between the passenger train and an empty semi-truck from the freight train. However, he stated that details surrounding this were still uncertain: "It [the trailer] either hit the train, or the train drove into it".[12] The full investigation could take up to a year.[25]

Initial media speculation focused on the weather conditions. At the time of the accident, the wind gusts were measured to be up to 20.9 m/s (69 ft/s), a gale, with average wind speeds lower.[26][27] The wind was coming from the north, perpendicular to the bridge.[28] If the average wind speeds, as measured over 10 minutes, had exceeded 21 m/s, the speed limit for freight trains would be decreased from 120 to 80 km/h (75 to 50 mph), and by 25 m/s (82 ft/s), all traffic would have to be cancelled. Since no limits were exceeded, no restrictions were imposed.[29][30] Both Banedanmark, operators of the Danish railways, and Sund & Bælt, operators of the bridge, said that all procedures had been followed.[31][29] According to Jacob Mann, professor in wind energy at DTU, the wind can not be the only cause of the accident.[28]

The media also focused on whether the semi-trailer was properly secured to the rail wagon. On this type of wagon, a pocket wagon, the front of a semi-trailer is fixed only with its kingpin. The back of the semi-trailer is kept in place as the wheels are lowered into a "pocket".[32] Following the accident, operator DB Cargo temporarily suspended all freight trains carrying bottle crates.[33] The accident resembled an incident in Hamburg, Germany, where a semi-truck that was not properly secured had been dislodged and collided with a bridge pier.[34][35] The European Union Agency for Railways is supposed to forward information relating to serious incidents, but Danish authorities had not been informed about the German accident prior to the Danish accident.[35][36]

On 5 January, the Danish Transport Authority issued a warning about pocket wagons used to transport semi-trailers, on the recommendation of the Accident Investigation Board Denmark, stating that the locking mechanism securing the trailer could pose a safety risk.[37][38] It also requested the Joint Network Secretariat (JNS) to open a formal procedure.[39] On 7 January, a test at DB Cargo showed that, after a semi-trailer had been loaded and secured, it could still be lifted off the wagon.[40] The freight train had been checked prior to departure, and seemed to have been properly secured.[41] The following day, the national transport authority temporarily prohibited the use of pocket wagons to transport semi-trailers until extra locking procedures were put in place, and tightened the rules for freight trains crossing the Great Belt, with respect to wind conditions.[42][43] Shortly after, temporary measures to avoid similar accidents were introduced throughout the continent by the European Union Agency for Railways.[44]

• List of rail accidents (2010–present)
• Rail transport in Denmark