INAVA

INAVA, sometimes referred to as hypothetical protein LOC55765, is a protein of unknown function that in humans is encoded by the INAVA gene.[5] Less common gene aliases include FLJ10901 and MGC125608.

INAVA
Identifiers
AliasesINAVA, chromosome 1 open reading frame 106, C1orf106, innate immunity activator
External IDsOMIM: 618051 MGI: 1921579 HomoloGene: 10103 GeneCards: INAVA
Gene location (Human)
Chr.Chromosome 1 (human)[1]
Band1q32.1Start200,891,048 bp[1]
End200,915,742 bp[1]
Orthologs
SpeciesHumanMouse
Entrez

55765

67313

Ensembl

ENSG00000163362

ENSMUSG00000041605

UniProt

Q3KP66

Q7TN12

RefSeq (mRNA)

NM_001142569
NM_018265
NM_001367289
NM_001367290

NM_028872

RefSeq (protein)

NP_001136041
NP_060735
NP_001354218
NP_001354219

NP_083148

Location (UCSC)Chr 1: 200.89 – 200.92 MbChr 1: 136.21 – 136.23 Mb
PubMed search[3][4]
Wikidata
View/Edit HumanView/Edit Mouse

Gene

Location

C1orf106 location on chromosome 1

In humans, INAVA is located on the long arm of chromosome 1 at locus 1q32.1. It spans from 200,891,499 to 200,915,736 (24.238 kb) on the plus strand.[5]

Gene neighborhood

Gene neighborhood

INAVA is flanked by G protein-coupled receptor 25 (upstream) and maestro heat-like repeat family member 3 (MROH3P), a predicted downstream pseudogene. Ribosomal protein L34 pseudogene 6 (RPL34P6) is further upstream and kinesin family member 21B is further downstream.[5]

Promoter

Predicted C1orf106 promoter region with putative transcription factor binding sites

There are seven predicted promoters for INAVA, and experimental evidence suggests that isoform 1 and 2, the most common isoforms, are transcribed using different promoters.[6] MatInspector, a tool available through Genomatix, was used to predict transcription factor binding sites within potential promoter regions. The transcription factors that are predicted to target the anticipated promoter for isoform 1 are expressed in a range of tissues. The most common tissues of expression are the urogenital system, nervous system and bone marrow. This coincides with expression data for the INAVA protein, which is highly expressed in the kidney and bone marrow.[7] A diagram of the predicted promoter region, with highlighted transcription factor binding sites, is shown to the right. The factors that are predicted to bind to the promoter region of isoform 2 differ, and twelve of the top twenty predicted factors are expressed in blood cells and/or tissues of the cardiovascular system.

Expression

C1orf106 is expressed in a wide range of tissues. Expression data from GEO profiles is shown below. The sites of highest expression, are listed in the table. Expression is moderate in the placenta, prostate, testis, lung, salivary glands and dendritic cells. It is low in the brain, most immune cells, the adrenal gland, uterus, heart and adipocytes.[7] Expression data, from various experiments, found on GEO profiles suggests that INAVA expression is up-regulated in several cancers including: lung, ovarian, colorectal and breast.

C1orf106 expression data from GEO profiles
TissuePercentile rank
B lymphocytes90
Trachea89
Skin88
Human bronchial epithelial cells88
Colorectal adenocarcinoma87
Kidney87
Tongue85
Pancreas84
Appendix82
Bone marrow80

mRNA

Isoforms

Nine putative isoforms are produced from the INAVA gene, seven of which are predicted to encode proteins.[8] Isoform 1 and 2, shown below, are the most common isoforms.

Most common C1orf106 isoforms

Isoform 1, which is the longest, is accepted as the canonical isoform. It contains ten exons, which encode a protein that is 677 amino acids long, depending on the source. Some sources report that the protein is only 663 amino acids due to the use of a start codon that is forty-two nucleotides downstream. According to NCBI, this isoform has only been predicted computationally.[5] This may be because the Kozak sequence surrounding the downstream start codon is more similar to the consensus Kozak sequence as shown in the table below. Softberry was used to obtain the sequence of the predicted isoform.[9] Isoform 2 is shorter due to a truncated N-terminus. Both isoforms have an alternative polyadenylation site.[8]

Surrounding sequence of start codons compared to Kozak consensus sequence

miRNA regulation

Predicted miRNA target sequence

miRNA-24 was identified as a microRNA that could potentially target INAVA mRNA.[10] The binding site, which is located in the 5' untranslated region is shown.

Protein

General properties

C1of106 protein (isoform 1)

Isoform 1, diagramed below, contains a DUF3338 domain, two low complexity regions and a proline rich region. The protein is arginine and proline rich, and has a lower than average amount of asparagine and hydrophobic amino acids, specifically phenylalanine and isoleucine.[11] The isoelectric point is 9.58, and the molecular weight of the unmodified protein is 72.9 kdal.[12] The protein is not predicted to have an N-terminal signal peptide, but there are predicted nuclear localization signals (NLS) and a leucine rich nuclear export signal.[13][14][15]

Modifications

INAVA is predicted to be highly phosphorylated.[16][17] Phosphoylation sites predicted by PROSITE are shown in the table below. NETPhos predictions are illustrated in the diagram. Each line points to a predicted phosphorylation site, and connects to a letter which represents either serine (S), threonine (T) or tyrosine (Y).

Phosphorylation sites predicted by PROSITE
Phosphorylation sites predicted by NETPhos. Letter corresponds to serine (S), threonine (T) or tyrosine (Y).

Structure

Coiled-coils are predicted to span from residue 130-160 and 200–260.[18] The secondary composition was predicted to be about 60% random coils, 30% alpha helices and 10% beta sheets.[19]

Interactions

The proteins with which the INAVA protein interacts are not well characterized. Text mining evidence suggests INAVA may interact with the following proteins: DNAJC5G, SLC7A13, PIEZO2, MUC19.[20] Experimental evidence, from a yeast two hybrid screen, suggests the INAVA protein interacts with 14-3-3 protein sigma, which is an adaptor protein.[21]

Homology

INAVA is well conserved in vertebrates as shown in the table below. Sequences were retrieved from BLAST[22] and BLAT.[23]

SequenceGenus and speciesCommon nameNCBI accessionLength(aa)Sequence identityTime since divergence (Mya)
*C1orf106Homo sapiensHumanNP_060735.3667100%NA
*C1orf106Macaca fascicularisCrab-eating macaqueXP_005540414.170397%29.0
*LOC289399Rattus norvegicusNorway ratNP_001178750.166786%92.3
*Predicted C1orf106 homologOdobenus rosmarus divergensWalrusXP_004392787.167285%94.2
*C1orf106-likeLoxodonta africanaElephantXP_003410255.166384%98.7
*Predicted C1orf106 homologDasypus novemcinctusNine-banded armadilloXP_004478752.167681%104.2
*Predicted C1orf106 homologOchotona princepsAmerican pikaXP_004578841.168178%92.3
*Predicted C1orf106 homologMonodelphis domesticaGray short-tailed opossumXP_001367913.257876%162.2
*Predicted C1orf106 homologChrysemys picta belliiPainted turtleXP_005313167.160256%296.0
*Predicted C1orf106 homologGeospiza fortisMedium ground finchXP_005426868.154250%296.0
*Predicted C1orf106 homologAlligator mississippiensisAlligatorXP_006278041.154749%296.0
*Predicted C1orf106 homologFicedula albicollisCollared flycatcherXP_005059352.154249%296.0
Predicted C1orf106 homologLatimeria chalumnaeWest Indian Ocean coelacanthXP_005988436.161346%414.9
*Predicted C1orf106 homologLepisosteus oculatusSpotted garXP_006628420.163744%400.1
*FERM domain containing 4AXenopus (Silurana) tropicalisWestern clawed frogXP_002935289.269543%371.2
*Predicted C1orf106 homologOreochromis niloticusNile tilapiaXP_005478188.157640%400.1
Predicted C1orf106 homologHaplochromis burtoniAstatotilapia burtoniXP_005914919.157640%400.1
Predicted C1orf106 homologPundamilia nyerereiHaplochromis nyerereiXP_005732720.157740%400.1
*LOC563192Danio rerioZebrafishNP_001073474.161237%400.1
LOC101161145Oryzias latipesJapanese rice fishXP_004069287.161233%400.1

A graph of the sequence identity versus the time since divergence for the asterisked entries is shown below. The colors correspond to degree of relatedness (green = closely related, purple = distantly related).

Percent sequence identity in relation to species relatedness

Paralogs

Proteins that are considered to be INAVA paralogs are not consistent between databases. A multiple sequence alignment (MSA) of potentially paralogous proteins was made to determine the likelihood of a truly paralogous relationship.[24] The sequences were retrieved from a BLAST search in humans with the C1orf106 protein. The MSA suggests the proteins share a homologous domain, DUF3338, which is found in eukaryotes. A portion of the multiple sequence alignment is shown below. Apart from the DUF domain (boxed in green), there was little conservation. The DUF3338 domain does not have any extraordinary physical properties, however, one notable finding is that each of the proteins in the MSA is predicted to have two nuclear localization signals. The proteins in the MSA are all predicted to localize to the nucleus.[13] A comparison of the physical properties of the proteins was also conducted using SAPS and is shown in the table.[11]

Conservation of the DUF3338 domain in humans
Physical properties of potential paralogs

Clinical significance

A total of 556 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been identified in the gene region of INAVA, 96 of which are associated with a clinical source.[25] Rivas et al.[26] identified four SNPs, shown in the table below, that may be associated with inflammatory bowel disease and Crohn's disease. According to GeneCards, other disease associations may include multiple sclerosis and ulcerative colitis.[27]

ResidueChangeNotes
333 (rs41313912)Tyrosine ⇒ phenylalaninePhosphorylated, moderate conservation
376Arginine ⇒ cysteineModerate conservation
397Arginine ⇒ threonineNot conserved
554 (rs61745433)Arginine ⇒ cysteineModerate conservation

Model organisms

Model organisms have been used in the study of INAVA function. A conditional knockout mouse line called 5730559C18Riktm2a(EUCOMM)Wtsi was generated at the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute.[28] Male and female animals underwent a standardized phenotypic screen[29] to determine the effects of deletion.[30][31][32][33] Additional screens performed: - In-depth immunological phenotyping[34] - in-depth bone and cartilage phenotyping[35]

References

  1. GRCh38: Ensembl release 89: ENSG00000163362 - Ensembl, May 2017
  2. GRCm38: Ensembl release 89: ENSMUSG00000041605 - Ensembl, May 2017
  3. "Human PubMed Reference:". National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine.
  4. "Mouse PubMed Reference:". National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine.
  5. "NCBI Gene 55765". Retrieved 10 February 2014.
  6. "Genomatix: MatInspector". Retrieved 6 March 2014.
  7. "GEO Profiles". Retrieved 6 March 2014.
  8. "Aceview". Retrieved 6 March 2014.
  9. "Softberry". Retrieved 20 April 2014.
  10. "TargetScanHuman 6.2". Retrieved 15 April 2014.
  11. "Statistical Analysis of Protein Sequences". Retrieved 20 April 2014.
  12. "Compute pI/Mw tool". Retrieved 10 April 2014.
  13. "PSORTII". Retrieved 20 April 2014.
  14. "cNLS Mapper". Retrieved 20 April 2014.
  15. "NetNES". Retrieved 20 April 2014.
  16. "NETPhos". Retrieved 20 April 2014.
  17. "Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics: PROSITE".
  18. "ExPASy COILS". Retrieved 20 April 2014.
  19. "SOPMA". Retrieved 27 April 2014.
  20. "STRING". Retrieved 15 April 2014.
  21. "MINT". Retrieved 15 April 2014.
  22. "BLAST". Retrieved 8 March 2014.
  23. "BLAT". Retrieved 8 March 2014.
  24. "SDSC Biology Workbench: ClustalW". Retrieved 12 March 2014.
  25. "dbSNP". Retrieved 22 April 2014.
  26. Rivas MA; et al. (2011). "Deep resequencing of GWAS loci identifies independent rare variants associated with inflammatory bowel disease". Nature Genetics. 43 (11): 1066–1073. doi:10.1038/ng.952. PMC 3378381. PMID 21983784.
  27. "GeneCards". Retrieved 1 May 2014.
  28. Gerdin AK (2010). "The Sanger Mouse Genetics Programme: high throughput characterisation of knockout mice". Acta Ophthalmologica. 88: 925–7. doi:10.1111/j.1755-3768.2010.4142.x.
  29. "International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium".
  30. Skarnes WC, Rosen B, West AP, Koutsourakis M, Bushell W, Iyer V, Mujica AO, Thomas M, Harrow J, Cox T, Jackson D, Severin J, Biggs P, Fu J, Nefedov M, de Jong PJ, Stewart AF, Bradley A (Jun 2011). "A conditional knockout resource for the genome-wide study of mouse gene function". Nature. 474 (7351): 337–42. doi:10.1038/nature10163. PMC 3572410. PMID 21677750.
  31. Dolgin E (Jun 2011). "Mouse library set to be knockout". Nature. 474 (7351): 262–3. doi:10.1038/474262a. PMID 21677718.
  32. Collins FS, Rossant J, Wurst W (Jan 2007). "A mouse for all reasons". Cell. 128 (1): 9–13. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.12.018. PMID 17218247.
  33. White JK, Gerdin AK, Karp NA, Ryder E, Buljan M, Bussell JN, Salisbury J, Clare S, Ingham NJ, Podrini C, Houghton R, Estabel J, Bottomley JR, Melvin DG, Sunter D, Adams NC, Sanger Institute Mouse Genetics Project, Tannahill D, Logan DW, Macarthur DG, Flint J, Mahajan VB, Tsang SH, Smyth I, Watt FM, Skarnes WC, Dougan G, Adams DJ, Ramirez-Solis R, Bradley A, Steel KP (2013). "Genome-wide generation and systematic phenotyping of knockout mice reveals new roles for many genes". Cell. 154 (2): 452–64. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.06.022. PMC 3717207. PMID 23870131.
  34. "Infection and Immunity Immunophenotyping (3i) Consortium".
  35. "OBCD Consortium".
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.