James R. Winchester

Governor of Oklahoma Frank Keating appointed Winchester to the Oklahoma Supreme Court on January 4, 2000, replacing the late Justice, Alma Wilson, who had died during the previous year. He was named to District 5, which includes Carter, Cleveland, Garvin, Grady, Jefferson, Love, McClain and Stephens counties.[2] In 2007, the eight other Justices of the Oklahoma Supreme Court elected him to serve a two-year term as Chief Justice of Oklahoma.

Justice Winchester was last re-elected to the same position in November 26 by a large margin. According to the Norman Transcript, the tally was:

During Winchester's term as Chief Justice, the court issued a new rule that restricted public internet access to Supreme Court documents. The only exception was to allow access to dockets, and parties to the case were required to redact personal information before the document could be released. The justification was to balance the right of privacy of individuals against the right of public access. Chief Justice Winchester and four Associate Justices signed the order on March 11, 2008. The new rule was to take effect June 10, 2008.[5]

Justice Yvonne Kauger wrote a separate opinion that partly concurred and partly dissented from the majority. She said that she disagreed with "... the instantaneous restriction of public access to current public court documents on line."[5] In addition, she wrote:

The court made this decision with input only from the court clerks. Others directly affected by the decision - the bar, the bench, the Legislature, the public - were not consulted. . . . [A]s a result of this order, not only is the court taking a giant, 30-year leap backwards to a time when the personal computer was nonexistent, the public is now paying for access to a system which is made inaccessible by the order.[5]

A post on the same blog from a reader named only as Don, said, "...Oklahoma Supreme Court has withdrawn its order restricting public access to court records." The post further explained that lawyers, free-speech advocates, law enforcement, court clerks, journalists and companies that perform background checks had all complained that the rules were too far-reaching. The office of the Chief Justice publicly announced that it was withdrawing the order to allow time for further study and consideration of the issue.[5]

John M. Wylie of the Oologah Lake Leader was named as the March 2008 editorial winner by the Oklahoma Press Association (OPA) for a highly critical piece he wrote, even citing two provisions of the Oklahoma Constitution that Winchester and his colleagues allegedly violated in attempting to impose the order. He stated that these Justices should be impeached if they did not reverse course and vacate the order. OPA posted the rebuke online for wider distribution.[6]

In one 2015 case, Prescott v. Oklahoma Capitol Preservation Commission, Winchester sided with a majority of the court, where the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) had sued to force the removal of a monument to the Ten Commandments from the Oklahoma Capitol building. The defense team, whose aim was to restore the monument to the capitol grounds, was led by E. Scott Pruitt, then the Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma, assisted by two other attorneys from his office.[lower-alpha 1] The court majority ruled that the monument must be removed promptly because it violated Article 2, Section 5, of the Oklahoma Constitution, which states that (state) property cannot be used to promote a "church denomination or system of religion." Seven Justices supported the plaintiff (ACLU) while two supported the state's position that there was no violation.[lower-alpha 2] Governor Mary Fallin claimed the Court's ruling was erroneous and announced that she would not allow the removal while the state appealed the decision.[7] Despite Governor Fallin's statement, the Ten Commandments was removed from the capitol building in early October 2016.[8]

After the verdict was announced, opposition groups that wanted the monument restored on the Capitol grounds announced their intention to recall the justices at the November 2016 General Election. However, all nine justices won by wide margins, retaining their positions.

This case directly led to State Question 790, "Religion and the State" on the November, 2016 ballot. The proposition was to repeal Article 2, Section 5 of the Oklahoma Constitution.[9] The question was soundly defeated in the election.[lower-alpha 3]