Maurice Rossel

Artist's rendition of Theresienstadt living quarters

In 1943, the ICRC came under increasing pressure from Jewish organizations and the Czechoslovak government-in-exile to intervene in favor of Jews, in light of accumulating reports of the extermination of Jews by the Nazi regime.[lower-alpha 2] In an attempt to preserve its credibility and preeminence as a humanitarian organization, the ICRC requested to visit Theresienstadt concentration camp in November 1943.[4] The visit was also part of a larger program of verification that packages sent by the ICRC to concentration camp prisoners were not being diverted by the German military.[5][lower-alpha 3] It is unclear to what extent the ICRC valued making an accurate report on Theresienstadt,[5] given that it had access to independent information confirming that prisoners were transported to Auschwitz and murdered there.[lower-alpha 4] The Danish government also pressured the Nazis to allow a visit, because of the Danish Jews who had been deported there in late 1943.[9] Theresienstadt, a hybrid concentration camp and ghetto, was used as a temporary holding camp for Jews whose final destination was extermination camps, especially Auschwitz. During the camp's existence, 33,000 prisoners died of starvation and illness.[10] The camp had been prepared for the visit by deporting 7,500 of its inhabitants to Auschwitz in order to ease overcrowding. Other prisoners had been forced to work on construction projects to superficially "beautify" the ghetto, including changing all the street names and building a fake school and other sham institutions that never operated. On the day of the visit, war veterans and other disabled Jews were forbidden from going out onto the streets.[11]

On 22 June 1944, Rossel left Berlin with Eigil Juel Hennigsen, head of the Danish Ministry of Health, and Frants Hvass, director general of the Danish Foreign Ministry.[11][12] The foreigners were chaperoned by several senior Schutzstaffel (SS) officials, most of them dressed in civilian clothes.[13][lower-alpha 5] The next day, they spent eight hours inside Theresienstadt, led on a predetermined path.[14][11] The visitors were only allowed to speak with Danish Jews and selected representatives, including Paul Eppstein, head of the Council of Elders.[9] Driven in a limousine by an SS officer posing as his driver,[15] Eppstein was forced to describe Theresienstadt as "a normal country town" of which he was "mayor",[9][16] and to give the visitors fabricated statistical data on the camp.[9] Rossel and the other representatives accepted the SS restrictions and made no attempt to investigate further, for example by investigating the stables, basements, and other unsuitable dwellings where most Theresienstadt prisoners were forced to live, or by asking questions of detainees.[12][17] Signs that Theresienstadt was not what the SS wanted to make it seem included a bruise underneath Eppstein's eye from when he had been beaten by Karl Rahm, the commandant of the camp, a few days earlier. During a brief opportunity to speak with Rossel alone, Eppstein tried to tip him off about the true situation. When asked about the ultimate fate of the prisoners, Eppstein said that there was "no way out" for them.[9][18] After the visit, the three foreigners were invited to dine with the Higher SS and Police Leader for the Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia, Karl Hermann Frank.[14]

Photo taken by Rossel at Theresienstadt. Most of the children were murdered at Auschwitz in the fall of 1944.[19][lower-alpha 6]

All three visitors wrote reports, although as a condition of the visit, agreed not to distribute them. While the Hennigsen and Hvass reports "did not uncover the Nazi lies", they expressed sympathy for the Jews. Rossel's report was noted for its uncritical acceptance of Nazi propaganda.[lower-alpha 7] He stated that Jews were not deported from Theresienstadt; in fact, 68,000 people had already been deported and most murdered. Rossel also said that the camp was a town whose inhabitants had "the freedom to organise their administration as they see fit".[11][19] Rossel claimed that the residents were adequately nourished, and even better fed than non-Jews in the Protectorate.[22][lower-alpha 8] He wrote that the inhabitants were fashionably dressed and that their health was "carefully looked after"; life in the "town" was "almost normal".[24][25] It has been noted that he described the inhabitants of the ghetto as "Israelites" (French: Israélites) instead of "Jews" (French: Juifs).[2][26] Echoing Nazi propaganda which depicted a Judeo-Bolshevist conspiracy, Rossel described the ghetto as a "communist society" and Eppstein as a "Little Stalin".[16] At the end of his report, Rossel casts doubt on the Final Solution:

Our report will change nobody's opinion. Everyone is free to condemn the Reich's attitude toward the solution of the Jewish problem. However, if this report could contribute in some small measure to dispel the mystery surrounding the Theresienstadt ghetto we shall be satisfied.

— Rossel's report[27]

It is unclear what Rossel's true impressions of Theresienstadt were; he said that he was expected to file a factual report, not speculate about what the Nazis might be hiding from him.[3][28] Some authors have suggested that Rossel knew that the tour of Theresienstadt was a sham, but others disagree. Rossel took 36 photographs during his visit, attaching sixteen to his report. All but one were taken outside, and most portrayed festive scenes staged by the SS, such as the picture of children playing (above). It appears that Rossel was not allowed to photograph hospitals, sanitary installations, or work sites. According to Swiss historians Sébastien Farré and Yan Schubert, the photographs were viewed by the ICRC as neutral statements of fact, even though they were in fact highly staged, not accurately representing the daily life of Theresienstadt prisoners.[29] The ICRC did not release the report from its archives until 1992.[30]

The Auschwitz complex

According to Rossel, it was forbidden both by the Nazi regime and the Red Cross to visit Auschwitz. Nevertheless, Rossel became the first Swiss person to visit the camp and spoke to the commandant of Auschwitz I.[3][31] According to Czech historian Miroslav Kárný, the visit was on 29 September 1944, when more than 1,000 Theresienstadt prisoners were gassed and cremated at the nearby Auschwitz II-Birkenau. Rossel said that he did not notice any sign of mass murder.[25] The ICRC states that the visit took place two days earlier, on 27 September.[32] He later said that he did not see much of the camp, but did observe emaciated prisoners (Muselmänner) whose appearance greatly shocked him.[33]

Rossel's report is considered so important to the study of Theresienstadt and the Holocaust in the Czech lands that the full text was published in the first edition of Terezínské studie a dokumenty, an academic journal sponsored by the Terezín Initiative.[34]

According to Kárný, Rossel's report, particularly his insistence that Jews were not deported from Theresienstadt, had the effect of diminishing the credibility of the Vrba-Wetzler Report. Written by two Auschwitz escapees, Rudolf Vrba and Alfred Wetzler, the latter report accurately described the fate of Jews deported from Theresienstadt to Auschwitz—most were murdered.[19] Rossel's statement that Jews were not deported from Theresienstadt caused the ICRC to cancel a planned visit to the Theresienstadt family camp at Auschwitz II-Birkenau, to which Heinrich Himmler had already given his permission. Kárný and Israeli historian Otto Dov Kulka draw a direct connection between the report and the liquidation of the family camp in July, in which 6,500 people were murdered.[16][19][34] Rossel sent his photographs to Eberhard von Thadden, an official in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. In a press conference, von Thadden showed copies of the photographs in an attempt to disprove reports on the Holocaust.[19]

The Red Cross' response to the Holocaust has been the subject of significant controversy and criticism.[lower-alpha 9] The choice of the young and inexperienced Rossel for the Theresienstadt visit has been interpreted as indicative of his organization's indifference to the "Jewish problem". His report has been described as "emblematic of the failure of the ICRC" to advocate for Jews during the Holocaust.[35][lower-alpha 10] Survivors accused the Red Cross representatives of seeing only what they wanted to see. One wrote that "a serious commission which really wanted to investigate our living conditions.... would have gone independently into the stables and attics".[17] However, an April 1945 report on Theresienstadt by a Red Cross delegation led by Otto Lehner was described as "even more unconscionable".[19]