Mifflin v. R. H. White Company
Mifflin v. R. H. White Company, 190 U.S. 260 (1903), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the authorized appearance of a work in a magazine without a copyright notice specifically dedicated to that work transfers that work into the public domain.[1] Its opinion was also applied to the next case, Mifflin v. Dutton.[2]
Mifflin v. R. H. White Company | |
---|---|
Argued April 30 – May 1, 1903 Decided June 1, 1903 | |
Full case name | Mifflin v. R. H. White Company |
Citations | 190 U.S. 260 (more) 23 S. Ct. 769; 47 L. Ed. 1040 |
Holding | |
The authorized appearance of a work in a magazine without a copyright notice specifically dedicated to that work transfers that work into the public domain. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinion | |
Majority | Brown, joined by unanimous |
The case concerned The Professor at the Breakfast-Table by Oliver Wendell Holmes Sr., published serially in Atlantic Monthly in 1859.[1]
Holmes v. Hurst was an earlier Supreme Court case dealing with similar circumstances for Holmes's earlier work, The Autocrat of the Breakfast-Table.[3]
References
- Mifflin v. R. H. White Company, 190 U.S. 260 (1903).
- Mifflin v. Dutton, 190 U.S. 265 (1903).
- Hamlin, Arthur Sears (1904). Copyright Cases. New York and London: G. P. Putnam's Sons. pp. 84–86.
External links
- Text of Mifflin v. R. H. White Company, 190 U.S. 260 (1903) is available from: CourtListener Justia Library of Congress
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.