Nausiphanes

Nausiphanes (Greek: Ναυσιφάνης; lived c. 325 BC), a native of Teos, was attached to the philosophy of Democritus. He was a pupil of Pyrrho[1][2] and a teacher to Epicurus, who was dissatisfied with him.[3][4]

Part of a series on
Pyrrhonism
Precursors
Philosophy
Pyrrhonists
Similar philosophies
Contrary philosophies
 Philosophy portal

Biography

Nausiphanes had a large number of pupils, and was particularly famous as a rhetorician. Epicurus was at one time one of his hearers, but was unsatisfied with him, and apparently abused him in his writings.[3][5] He also argued that the study of natural philosophy (physics) was the best foundation for studying rhetoric or politics.[6] There is a polemic in Philodemus' On Rhetoric against Nausiphanes' view that the natural philosopher is the best orator.[7] Epicurus may also have derived his three criteria of truth in his Canon from the Tripod of Nausiphanes.[3]

Only the following summary[8] of the Tripod survives, written by Philodemus.

1. The man of science has the capacity for rhetoric, even if he does not practise it.

2. The wise man will pursue rhetoric, because honour depends on winning a reputation for cleverness in politics, rather than on the over-lauded virtues.

The wise man is he who can persuade his hearers; this power belongs to the man of science, its source being his knowledge of the facts, so that he could pass on his own convictions not only to his pupils but to any race of people. Having a knowledge of the facts, he is able to lead his audience where he wishes, because he can tell them what is to their advantage, which is what they wish to hear. The scientist has command of the best diction also: not that created by vain imagination and usage, but that based on the nature of things. He also has command of logic, without which knowledge is impossible, and is best qualified in that art indispensable to a statesman in a democracy or monarchy or any other constitution, of calculation of the future from the known facts.

The man who employs continuous discourse will be best able to employ the dialectic method and vice versa, because both depend on an accurate judgement of how to lead pupils from the known to the unknown; that is, they depend upon a knowledge of the 'right time' and 'right measure' in speaking.

3. Nausiphanes gave 'immovability' as the goal of life, this being the name he gave to Democritus’ 'imperturbability'.

4. Of those things which appear to exist, nothing exists more than it does not exist.

Notes
  1. Diogenes Laertius, ix.
  2. Sextus Empiricus, adv. Math. i. 1.
  3. Diogenes Laertius, x.
  4. Cicero, de Natura Deorum, i. 26, 33.
  5. Cicero, de Natura Deorum, i. 26, 33.
  6. Sedley, David N. "Nausiphanes." In Hornblower, Simon and Antony Spawforth, eds. The Oxford Classical Dictionary. New York: OUP, 2003. p. 1029
  7. Warren, J., Epicurus and Democritean Ethics: An Archaeology of Ataraxia. Cambridge University Press. (2002).
  8. http://www.sacred-texts.com/cla/app/app70.htm
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.