Optical theorem

The optical theorem was originally developed independently by Wolfgang Sellmeier[2] and Lord Rayleigh in 1871.[3] Lord Rayleigh recognized the forward scattering amplitude in terms of the index of refraction as

${\displaystyle n=1+2\pi {\frac {Nf(0)}{k^{2}}}}$

(where N is the number density of scatterers), which he used in a study of the color and polarization of the sky.

The equation was later extended to quantum scattering theory by several individuals, and came to be known as the Bohr–Peierls–Placzek relation after a 1939 paper. It was first referred to as the "optical theorem" in print in 1955 by Hans Bethe and Frederic de Hoffmann, after it had been known as a "well known theorem of optics" for some time.

The theorem can be derived rather directly from a treatment of a scalar wave. If a plane wave is incident along positive z axis on an object, then the wave amplitude a great distance away from the scatterer is approximately given by

${\displaystyle \psi (\mathbf {r} )\approx e^{ikz}+f(\theta ){\frac {e^{ikr}}{r}}.}$

All higher terms, when squared, vanish more quickly than ${\displaystyle 1/r^{2}}$, and so are negligible a great distance away. For large values of ${\displaystyle z}$ and for small angles, a Taylor expansion gives us

${\displaystyle r={\sqrt {x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}}}\approx z+{\frac {x^{2}+y^{2}}{2z}}.}$

We would now like to use the fact that the intensity is proportional to the square of the amplitude ${\displaystyle \psi }$. Approximating ${\displaystyle 1/r}$ as ${\displaystyle 1/z}$, we have

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}|\psi |^{2}&\approx \left|e^{ikz}+{\frac {f(\theta )}{z}}e^{ikz}e^{ik(x^{2}+y^{2})/2z}\right|^{2}\\&=1+{\frac {f(\theta )}{z}}e^{ik(x^{2}+y^{2})/2z}+{\frac {f^{*}(\theta )}{z}}e^{-ik(x^{2}+y^{2})/2z}+{\frac {|f(\theta )|^{2}}{z^{2}}}.\end{aligned}}}$

If we drop the ${\displaystyle 1/z^{2}}$ term and use the fact that ${\displaystyle c+c^{*}=2\operatorname {Re} {c}}$, we have

${\displaystyle |\psi |^{2}\approx 1+2\operatorname {Re} {\left[{\frac {f(\theta )}{z}}e^{ik(x^{2}+y^{2})/2z}\right]}.}$

Now suppose we integrate over a screen far away in the xy plane, which is small enough for the small-angle approximations to be appropriate, but large enough that we can integrate the intensity over ${\displaystyle -\infty }$ to ${\displaystyle \infty }$ in x and y with negligible error. In optics, this is equivalent to summing over many fringes of the diffraction pattern. To further simplify matters, let's approximate ${\displaystyle f(\theta )=f(0)}$. We obtain

${\displaystyle \int |\psi |^{2}\,dx\,dy\approx A+2\operatorname {Re} \left[{\frac {f(0)}{z}}\int _{-\infty }^{\infty }e^{ikx^{2}/2z}dx\int _{-\infty }^{\infty }e^{iky^{2}/2z}dy\right],}$

where A is the area of the surface integrated over. Although these are improper integrals, by suitable substitutions the exponentials can be transformed into complex Gaussians and the definite integrals evaluated resulting in:

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\int |\psi |^{2}\,da&=A-2\operatorname {Re} \left[{\frac {f(0)}{z}}\,{\frac {2\pi z}{ik}}\right]\\&=A-{\frac {4\pi }{k}}\,\operatorname {Im} [f(0)].\end{aligned}}}$

This is the probability of reaching the screen if none were scattered, lessened by an amount ${\displaystyle (4\pi /k)\operatorname {Im} [f(0)]}$, which is therefore the effective scattering cross section of the scatterer.

• S-matrix

• Roger G. Newton (1976). "Optical Theorem and Beyond". Am. J. Phys. 44 (7): 639–642. Bibcode:1976AmJPh..44..639N. doi:10.1119/1.10324.
• John David Jackson (1999). Classical Electrodynamics. Hamilton Printing Company. ISBN 0-471-30932-X.