Superparticular ratio

In mathematics, a superparticular ratio, also called a superparticular number or epimoric ratio, is the ratio of two consecutive integer numbers.

Just diatonic semitone on C: ¹⁶⁄₁₅ = ¹⁵⁺¹⁄₁₅ = 1+¹⁄₁₅

Play

More particularly, the ratio takes the form:

{\frac {n+1}{n}}=1+{\frac {1}{n}}

where

n

is a positive integer.

Thus:

A superparticular number is when a great number contains a lesser number, to which it is compared, and at the same time one part of it. For example, when 3 and 2 are compared, they contain 2, plus the 3 has another 1, which is half of two. When 3 and 4 are compared, they each contain a 3, and the 4 has another 1, which is a third apart of 3. Again, when 5, and 4 are compared, they contain the number 4, and the 5 has another 1, which is the fourth part of the number 4, etc.
— Throop (2006), [1]

Superparticular ratios were written about by Nicomachus in his treatise Introduction to Arithmetic. Although these numbers have applications in modern pure mathematics, the areas of study that most frequently refer to the superparticular ratios by this name are music theory[2] and the history of mathematics.[3]

Mathematical properties

As Leonhard Euler observed, the superparticular numbers (including also the multiply superparticular ratios, numbers formed by adding an integer other than one to a unit fraction) are exactly the rational numbers whose continued fraction terminates after two terms. The numbers whose continued fraction terminates in one term are the integers, while the remaining numbers, with three or more terms in their continued fractions, are superpartient.[4]

The Wallis product

\prod _{n=1}^{\infty }\left({\frac {2n}{2n-1}}\cdot {\frac {2n}{2n+1}}\right)={\frac {2}{1}}\cdot {\frac {2}{3}}\cdot {\frac {4}{3}}\cdot {\frac {4}{5}}\cdot {\frac {6}{5}}\cdot {\frac {6}{7}}\cdots ={\frac {4}{3}}\cdot {\frac {16}{15}}\cdot {\frac {36}{35}}\cdots =2\cdot {\frac {8}{9}}\cdot {\frac {24}{25}}\cdot {\frac {48}{49}}\cdots ={\frac {\pi }{2}}

represents the irrational number $π$ in several ways as a product of superparticular ratios and their inverses. It is also possible to convert the Leibniz formula for π into an Euler product of superparticular ratios in which each term has a prime number as its numerator and the nearest multiple of four as its denominator:[5]

{\frac {\pi }{4}}={\frac {3}{4}}\cdot {\frac {5}{4}}\cdot {\frac {7}{8}}\cdot {\frac {11}{12}}\cdot {\frac {13}{12}}\cdot {\frac {17}{16}}\cdots

In graph theory, superparticular numbers (or rather, their reciprocals, 1/2, 2/3, 3/4, etc.) arise via the Erdős–Stone theorem as the possible values of the upper density of an infinite graph.[6]

Other applications

In the study of harmony, many musical intervals can be expressed as a superparticular ratio (for example, due to octave equivalency, the ninth harmonic, 9/1, may be expressed as a superparticular ratio, 9/8). Indeed, whether a ratio was superparticular was the most important criterion in Ptolemy's formulation of musical harmony.[7] In this application, Størmer's theorem can be used to list all possible superparticular numbers for a given limit; that is, all ratios of this type in which both the numerator and denominator are smooth numbers.[2]

These ratios are also important in visual harmony. Aspect ratios of 4:3 and 3:2 are common in digital photography,[8] and aspect ratios of 7:6 and 5:4 are used in medium format and large format photography respectively.[9]

Ratio names and related intervals

Every pair of adjacent positive integers represent a superparticular ratio, and similarly every pair of adjacent harmonics in the harmonic series (music) represent a superparticular ratio. Many individual superparticular ratios have their own names, either in historical mathematics or in music theory. These include the following:

Examples
Ratio	Cents	Name/musical interval	Ben Johnston notation above C	Audio
2:1	1200	duplex:[lower-alpha 1] octave	C'	Play
3:2	701.96	sesquialterum:[lower-alpha 1] perfect fifth	G	Play
4:3	498.04	sesquitertium:[lower-alpha 1] perfect fourth	F	Play
5:4	386.31	sesquiquartum:[lower-alpha 1] major third	E	Play
6:5	315.64	sesquiquintum:[lower-alpha 1] minor third	E♭	Play
7:6	266.87	septimal minor third	E♭	Play
8:7	231.17	septimal major second	D-	Play
9:8	203.91	sesquioctavum:[lower-alpha 1] major second	D	Play
10:9	182.40	sesquinona:[lower-alpha 1] minor tone	D-	Play
11:10	165.00	greater undecimal neutral second	D↑♭-	Play
12:11	150.64	lesser undecimal neutral second	D↓	Play
15:14	119.44	septimal diatonic semitone	C♯	Play
16:15	111.73	just diatonic semitone	D♭-	Play
17:16	104.96	minor diatonic semitone	C♯	Play
21:20	84.47	septimal chromatic semitone	D♭	Play
25:24	70.67	just chromatic semitone	C♯	Play
28:27	62.96	septimal third-tone	D♭-	Play
32:31	54.96	31st subharmonic, inferior quarter tone	D♭-	Play
49:48	35.70	septimal diesis	D♭	Play
50:49	34.98	septimal sixth-tone	B♯-	Play
64:63	27.26	septimal comma, 63rd subharmonic	C-	Play
81:80	21.51	syntonic comma	C+	Play
126:125	13.79	septimal semicomma	D	Play
128:127	13.58	127th subharmonic		Play
225:224	7.71	septimal kleisma	B♯	Play
256:255	6.78	255th subharmonic	D-	Play
4375:4374	0.40	ragisma	C♯-	Play

The root of some of these terms comes from Latin sesqui- "one and a half" (from semis "a half" and -que "and") describing the ratio 3:2.

Notes

Ancient name

Citations

Throop, Priscilla (2006). Isidore of Seville's Etymologies: Complete English Translation, Volume 1, p. III.6.12, n. 7. ISBN 978-1-4116-6523-1.
Halsey, G. D.; Hewitt, Edwin (1972). "More on the superparticular ratios in music". American Mathematical Monthly. 79 (10): 1096–1100. doi:10.2307/2317424. JSTOR 2317424. MR 0313189.
Robson, Eleanor; Stedall, Jacqueline (2008), The Oxford Handbook of the History of Mathematics, Oxford University Press, ISBN 9780191607448. On pp. 123–124 the book discusses the classification of ratios into various types including the superparticular ratios, and the tradition by which this classification was handed down from Nichomachus to Boethius, Campanus, Oresme, and Clavius.
Leonhard Euler; translated into English by Myra F. Wyman and Bostwick F. Wyman (1985), "An essay on continued fractions" (PDF), Mathematical Systems Theory, 18: 295–328, doi:10.1007/bf01699475CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link). See in particular p. 304.
Debnath, Lokenath (2010), The Legacy of Leonhard Euler: A Tricentennial Tribute, World Scientific, p. 214, ISBN 9781848165267.
Erdős, P.; Stone, A. H. (1946). "On the structure of linear graphs". Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society. 52 (12): 1087–1091. doi:10.1090/S0002-9904-1946-08715-7.
Barbour, James Murray (2004), Tuning and Temperament: A Historical Survey, Courier Dover Publications, p. 23, ISBN 9780486434063, The paramount principle in Ptolemy's tunings was the use of superparticular proportion..
Ang, Tom (2011), Digital Photography Essentials, Penguin, p. 107, ISBN 9780756685263. Ang also notes the 16:9 (widescreen) aspect ratio as another common choice for digital photography, but unlike 4:3 and 3:2 this ratio is not superparticular.
The 7:6 medium format aspect ratio is one of several ratios possible using medium-format 120 film, and the 5:4 ratio is achieved by two common sizes for large format film, 4×5 inches and 8×10 inches. See e.g. Schaub, George (1999), How to Photograph the Outdoors in Black and White, How to Photograph Series, 9, Stackpole Books, p. 43, ISBN 9780811724500.

External links

Superparticular numbers applied to construct pentatonic scales by David Canright.
De Institutione Arithmetica, liber II by Anicius Manlius Severinus Boethius

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.

[Ancient_name-10] Ancient name

[1] Throop, Priscilla (2006). Isidore of Seville's Etymologies: Complete English Translation, Volume 1, p. III.6.12, n. 7. ISBN 978-1-4116-6523-1.

[hh-2] Halsey, G. D.; Hewitt, Edwin (1972). "More on the superparticular ratios in music". American Mathematical Monthly. 79 (10): 1096–1100. doi:10.2307/2317424. JSTOR 2317424. MR 0313189.

[3] Robson, Eleanor; Stedall, Jacqueline (2008), The Oxford Handbook of the History of Mathematics, Oxford University Press, ISBN 9780191607448. On pp. 123–124 the book discusses the classification of ratios into various types including the superparticular ratios, and the tradition by which this classification was handed down from Nichomachus to Boethius, Campanus, Oresme, and Clavius.

[4] Leonhard Euler; translated into English by Myra F. Wyman and Bostwick F. Wyman (1985), "An essay on continued fractions" (PDF), Mathematical Systems Theory, 18: 295–328, doi:10.1007/bf01699475CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link). See in particular p. 304.

[5] Debnath, Lokenath (2010), The Legacy of Leonhard Euler: A Tricentennial Tribute, World Scientific, p. 214, ISBN 9781848165267.

[6] Erdős, P.; Stone, A. H. (1946). "On the structure of linear graphs". Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society. 52 (12): 1087–1091. doi:10.1090/S0002-9904-1946-08715-7.

[7] Barbour, James Murray (2004), Tuning and Temperament: A Historical Survey, Courier Dover Publications, p. 23, ISBN 9780486434063, The paramount principle in Ptolemy's tunings was the use of superparticular proportion..

[8] Ang, Tom (2011), Digital Photography Essentials, Penguin, p. 107, ISBN 9780756685263. Ang also notes the 16:9 (widescreen) aspect ratio as another common choice for digital photography, but unlike 4:3 and 3:2 this ratio is not superparticular.

[9] The 7:6 medium format aspect ratio is one of several ratios possible using medium-format 120 film, and the 5:4 ratio is achieved by two common sizes for large format film, 4×5 inches and 8×10 inches. See e.g. Schaub, George (1999), How to Photograph the Outdoors in Black and White, How to Photograph Series, 9, Stackpole Books, p. 43, ISBN 9780811724500.