Sycamore processor

Sycamore is a quantum processor created by Google Inc.'s Artificial Intelligence division.[1] It comprises 53 qubits.

In 2019, Sycamore completed a task in 200 seconds that Google claimed, in a Nature paper, would take a state-of-the-art supercomputer 10,000 years to finish. Thus, Google claimed to have achieved quantum supremacy. To estimate the time that would be taken by a classical supercomputer, Google ran portions of the quantum circuit simulation on the Summit, the most powerful classical computer in the world.[2][3][4][5] Later, IBM made a counter-argument, claiming that the task would only take 2.5 days on a classical system like Summit.[6][7] If Google's claims are upheld, then it would represent an exponential leap in computing power.[8][9][10][11]

In August 2020 quantum engineers working for Google reported the largest chemical simulation on a quantum computer – a Hartree-Fock approximation with Sycamore paired with a classical computer that analyzed results to provide new parameters for the 12-qubit system.[12][13][14]

In December 2020, the Chinese photon-based Jiuzhang processor, developed by USTC, achieved a processing power of 76 qubits and was 10 billion times faster than Sycamore, making it the second computer to attain quantum supremacy.[15]

References

  1. Kan, Michael (October 23, 2019). "Google Claims Quantum Computing Achievement, IBM Says Not So Fast". PCMAG.
  2. Arute, Frank; Arya, Kunal; Babbush, Ryan; Bacon, Dave; Bardin, Joseph C.; Barends, Rami; Biswas, Rupak; Boixo, Sergio; Brandao, Fernando G. S. L.; Buell, David A.; Burkett, Brian (October 2019). "Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor". Nature. 574 (7779): 505–510. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1666-5. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 31645734.
  3. "Google claims 'quantum supremacy' for computer". BBC News. 23 October 2019. Retrieved 23 October 2019.
  4. "Hello quantum world! Google publishes landmark quantum supremacy claim". Nature. 23 October 2019. Retrieved 23 October 2019.
  5. "Google Claims Breakthrough in Blazingly Fast Computing". The New York Times. 2019-10-23. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2019-11-03.
  6. "On "Quantum Supremacy"". IBM Research Blog. 2019-10-22. Retrieved 2019-10-28.
  7. Whyte, Chelsea (October 5, 2019). "What next for quantum computers?". New Scientist. 243 (3250): 15. doi:10.1016/S0262-4079(19)31852-4.
  8. Shankland, Stephen. "Quantum supremacy? Done. Now the hard work begins for mere quantum practicality". CNET.
  9. Savage, Neil. "Hands-On with Google's Quantum Computer". Scientific American.
  10. Mack, Eric (October 24, 2019). "No, Google and Its Quantum Computer Aren't Killing Bitcoin Anytime Soon". Inc.com.
  11. "IBM Search". www.ibm.com. February 26, 2018.
  12. "Google conducts largest chemical simulation on a quantum computer to date". phys.org. Retrieved 7 September 2020.
  13. Savage, Neil. "Google's Quantum Computer Achieves Chemistry Milestone". Scientific American. Retrieved 7 September 2020.
  14. Google AI Quantum Collaborators (28 August 2020). "Hartree-Fock on a superconducting qubit quantum computer". Science. 369 (6507): 1084–1089. arXiv:2004.04174. doi:10.1126/science.abb9811. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 32855334. S2CID 215548188. Retrieved 7 September 2020.
  15. Ball, Philip (2020-12-03). "Physicists in China challenge Google's 'quantum advantage'". Nature. 588 (7838): 380. doi:10.1038/d41586-020-03434-7. PMID 33273711.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.