Tennessee Wine and Spirits Retailers Assn. v. Thomas

Tennessee Wine and Spirits Retailers Association v. Thomas, No. 18-96, 587 U.S. ___ (2019), was a United States Supreme Court case which held that Tennessee's 2-year durational-residency requirement applicable to retail liquor store license applicants violated the Commerce Clause and was not saved by the Twenty-first Amendment.[1][2][3]

Tennessee Wine and Spirits Retailers Association v. Thomas
Argued January 16, 2019
Decided June 26, 2019
Full case nameTennessee Wine and Spirits Retailers Association v. Russell F. Thomas, Executive Director of the Tennessee Alcoholic Beverage Commission, et al.
Docket no.18-96
Citations587 U.S. ___ (more)
139 S. Ct. 2449; 204 L. Ed. 2d 801
Case history
PriorPartial summary judgment granted, Byrd v. Tenn. Wine & Spirits Retailers Ass'n, 259 F. Supp. 3d 785 (M.D. Tenn. 2017); affirmed, Byrd v. Tenn. Wine & Spirits Retailers Ass'n, 883 F. Supp. 3d 608 (6th Cir. 2018)
Holding
Tennessee's 2-year durational-residency requirement applicable to retail liquor store license applicants violates the Commerce Clause and is not saved by the Twenty-first Amendment
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Clarence Thomas · Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer · Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan
Neil Gorsuch · Brett Kavanaugh
Case opinions
MajorityAlito, joined by Roberts, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan, and Kavanaugh
DissentGorsuch, joined by Thomas
Laws applied
U.S. Const. art. I, § 8, cl. 3

Background

Total Wine & More applied to open a store in Knoxville, Tennessee which the state intended to approve based on the state Attorney General's opinion that the residency requirements were unenforceable. The trade group representing existing retailers sued the state to prevent approval.

References


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.