The Story of Temple Drake

The film is based on the novel Sanctuary, by William Faulkner (pictured)

In 1932, Paramount Pictures acquired the rights to the film's basis, the controversial novel Sanctuary (1931) by William Faulkner, for $6,000.[4] Faulkner's novel dealt with a young Southern debutante held captive by a gang member and rapist.[2] As the public felt the novel had a racy reputation, the film received a new title as the plot had been made more mild and to avoid associating it with the source work.[1] Despite this, even before filming had begun, it was publicly condemned by U.S. women's leagues, an article in The New York Times, as well as the Roman Catholic Church.[5]

The credits only stated that Faulkner wrote the original novel. Robert Litell, who wrote a review of the film published in The New Republic on June 14, 1933, stated that the film producers also consulted Faulkner; statements about this are not present in the credits.[6]

Several alterations were made to the screenplay that deviated from the source material: For example, in the novel, the judge is Temple's father; Phillips stated that "presumably" to make it more believable that he is "ineffectual" with her, he was changed into being her grandfather.[7] For a short period before the film went into production, it was tentatively titled The Shame of Temple Drake.[1]

The relatively upbeat ending of the film is in marked contrast to the ending of Faulkner's novel Sanctuary, in which Temple perjures herself in court, resulting in the lynching of an innocent man. E. Pauline Degenfelder of Worcester Public Schools wrote that the characterization of Temple differs from that of the novel version,[8] and that the film gives her a "dual nature" of a dark nature and a light nature.[9] Gene D. Phillips of Loyola University of Chicago wrote that she is "better" morally than the novel character.[10] According to Pre-Code scholar Thomas Doherty, the film implies that the deeds done to Temple are in recompense for her immorality in falling into a relationship with the gangster instead of fleeing him.[11]

Miriam Hopkins was cast as the titular Temple Drake

George Raft was initially cast as the male lead of Trigger,[12] but dropped out of the production, which resulted in his being temporarily suspended by Paramount.[1] Raft felt taking the role would be "screen suicide" as the character had no redeemable qualities,[13] and also demanded a salary of $2 million.[14] He was ultimately replaced by Jack La Rue, then a bit player for Paramount[13] who had garnered some notice for his performance in a Broadway production of Diamond Lil opposite Mae West.[14]

According to Filmink the fact the film ultimately "did little for La Rue’s career... served to give Raft a false idea of the quality of his instincts when it came to script selection. "[15]

Miriam Hopkins, who was cast in the titular role of Temple Drake, was a newcomer at the time of filming, and had only begun establishing herself in two Ernst Lubitsch films: The Smiling Lieutenant (1931) and Trouble in Paradise (1932).[13] Hopkins' mother was reportedly upset that her daughter was portraying a rape victim.[16] Hopkins herself would continually cite the role as one of her personal favorites due to its emotional complexity: "That Temple Drake, now, there was a thing. Just give me a nice un-standardized wretch like Temple three times a year! Give me the complex ladies, and I'll interpret the daylights out of them."[17]

Principal photography of The Story of Temple Drake began in mid-February 1933[14] on the Paramount Studio lot in Los Angeles, California.[18] According to biographer Allan Ellenberger, the mood on the set was "gloomy" due to the dark subject matter, and the cast members frequently played pranks on one another to lighten the mood.[19] Jean Negulesco, a sketch artist and technical advisor at Paramount, helped design and orchestrate the film's rape sequence.[16] Though the film only suggests the rape, as the scene concludes with Trigger approaching Temple, followed by her scream, Hopkins recalled that Negulesco had extensively "planned how it could be done...  If you can call a rape artistically done, it was."[16]

Will H. Hays, who was in charge of the Motion Picture Production Code, had objected to any film adaptation of Sanctuary, and, after the film was made, forbade any reference to it in advertising materials.[1] However, Joseph I. Breen, who was in charge of public relations for the Hays Office, stated the finished film was so tame in comparison to Faulkner's novel that patrons who had read it and watched the film would "charge us with fraud."[1]

In March 1933, the Hays Office recommended several cuts be made before the film was released, with the central rape scene being of utmost concern.[1] In the original cut (and in Faulkner's novel), Temple's rape occurs in a corn crib, and she is at one point penetrated with a corn cob during the assault.[1] In the initial cut of the film, the rape took place in a corn crib, and featured shots in which a corncob is picked up by Trigger and examined after the rape.[1][19] These shots were allegedly only supposed to be included in rushes and not in the final cut, but were considered obscene enough that the Hays Office ordered Paramount to reshoot the rape sequence in a barn, and mandated that no footage of a corncob could be shown.[1] The scenes at Reba's home were also "portrayed too graphically," according to the Hays Office, and they ordered Paramount to excise footage and dialogue that indicated that the home was a brothel.[1] It was now portrayed, despite nude statuary, as a boarding house.[20] Some lines were cut, while Ruby's use of the word "chippie" (a slang term for a woman of low morals) was occluded by a clap of thunder.[1]

Because the film was considered so scandalous, it has been credited with spurring the strict enforcement of the Hays Code.[21][22]

The Story of Temple Drake premiered theatrically in the United States on May 12, 1933.[1] According to film historian Lou Sabini, it was one of the highest-earning films of the year.[23]

Several protests and critical articles in newspapers appeared after the production company had purchased the rights before the release of the film.[7] Phillips wrote that some critics, while acknowledging the murder of Trigger would be justifiable, believed that it was wrong for the film to justify it.[24] A review published in The Washington Times lambasted the film, describing it as "trash," while the New York American deemed it "shoddy, obnoxiously disagreeable...  trashy, sex-plugged piece."[25] Edwin Schallert of the Los Angeles Times was similarly unimpressed, describing the film as "deliberately sordid, unsympathetic, and nearly offensive," as well as "crudely realistic."[26]

Some critics were more favorable in their responses, such as Martin Dickson of the Brooklyn Daily Eagle, who deemed the film a "compelling, if not always pleasant, photodrama," adding that Hopkins brings "a vital and credible characterization to the part."[27] The Atlanta Constitution also praised Hopkins' performance as "outstanding," and also praised La Rue as "excellent."[28] Mordaunt Hall of The New York Times heralded the cast as "well chosen," also adding that "Miss Hopkins delivers a capital portrayal."[29]

The Story of Temple Drake largely remained unavailable to the public after its initial theatrical release,[30] never even receiving television airings in the United States.[23] The Museum of Modern Art restored the film in 2011 and subsequently screened it to the public.[30] The Criterion Collection announced they will be releasing the film on Blu-ray and DVD for the first time on December 3, 2019.[31]