Tigrosa helluo

Tigrosa helluo is a species of spider belonging to the family Lycosidae, also known as wolf spiders. T. helluo was formerly known as Hogna helluo before differences between dorsal color patterns, habitat preferences, body structures, etc. were discovered.[2] The species is native to the United States, Canada and Mexico. They can be found across the eastern half of the United States, primarily in the northeast and New England, and as far west as Nebraska and Kansas. T. helluo can be found in diverse habitats including woods, marshes, fields, and riparian areas. Typically, members of this species prefer to live in wetter areas as opposed to dry environments. Males tend to live for around a year and females will live for close to two years.

Tigrosa helluo
Tigrosa helluo from Mason Neck, Virginia
Tigrosa hellu male from North Carolina
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Subphylum: Chelicerata
Class: Arachnida
Order: Araneae
Infraorder: Araneomorphae
Family: Lycosidae
Genus: Tigrosa
Species:
T. helluo
Binomial name
Tigrosa helluo
Synonyms[1]
  • Lycosa helluo Walckenaer, 1837
  • Lycosa sayi Walckenaer, 1837
  • Lycosa babingtoni Blackwall, 1846
  • Tarentula vafra C. L. Koch, 1847
  • Leimonia helluo (Walckenaer, 1837)
  • Leimonia sayi (Walckenaer, 1837)
  • Trochosa helvipes Keyserling, 1877
  • Lycosa nidicola Emerton, 1885
  • Lycosa crudelis Banks, 1892
  • Hogna helluo (Walckenaer, 1837)

The defining characteristic of T. helluo is its brown carapace and distinct yellow stripe starting from its anterior eyes extending down the cephalothorax. The underside of the abdomen has distinct black spots that distinguish T. helluo from other wolf spiders. At an average size of around 17 mm, T. helluo is one of the smaller wolf spiders. In addition, females tend to be larger than males in a display of sexual dimorphism.

Like other spiders of the family Lycosidae, wolf spiders are solitary and live and hunt alone. Unless in the process of mating, T. helluo will remain alone. They are usually active at night during which they hunt for prey. In addition, T. helluo do not create webs, although females will make burrows under rocks or boards. Relying on their excellent eyesight and senses, T. helluo are great hunters.

Members of the species T. helluo are not very aggressive and will not attack humans unless provoked. Their bites inject venom, however it is not medically significant to humans, as only minor pain and swelling occur. Anti-venom is rarely needed.

Description

The average body length for Tigrosa can be 10–31 mm for females and 11–24 mm for males while for T. helluo, body length averages at 17 mm. Compared to its close relative Tigrosa aspersa, T. helluo is much smaller. T. helluo is also often mistaken for Pisaurina mira, the nursery web spider, due to the physical resemblance.[3] However, the carapace of T. helluo consists of a brownish color contrasting with a distinctive yellow stripe that extends from the anterior eyes to the cephalothorax. Starting from the posterior median eyes, a set of fainter yellow stripes extend posteriorly. In addition, the underside of the abdomen is marked with several black spots. Patterns found on the dorsal side of the cephalothorax and abdomen are similar to those found on Tigrosa gerogicola, however the faint yellow stripes appearing on T. helluo do not extend as far. Black spots found on the abdomen of T. helluo are also not found on T. georgicola. Coloration in the legs differ between sexes, with males’ legs appearing yellow without distinct markings and females’ legs appearing reddish brown without additional markings or bands.[2]

Taxonomy

The Tigrosa genus was made from five species H. annexa, H. aspersa, H. grandis, and H. helluo, and H. radiata that were moved from the genus Hogna. This genus is defined by the distinct colored pattern on the dorsal cephalothorax, structure of the male palpus and epigynum, leg length, foraging behaviors, and eye arrangement. The aggressive nature and colorful patterns of these spiders related to the meaning of the word Tigrosa, which is “fierce like a tiger”.[4]

Habitat and distribution

Habitat

In the United States, T. hellio can be found in a large variety of states, in woods, marshes, and even grassy areas in northeastern states such as Connecticut. Females' nests are often found under stones or boards in fields and woods.[5] These nests consist of burrows lined with silk.[6] However, in states like Florida and Mississippi, T. helluo can most often be found in wetter areas such as marshes and lakes.[2]

Distribution

Tigrosa helluo can be found throughout the United States, Canada, and Mexico. They primarily reside along the east coast in the New England region but can be found along the entire east coast down to Florida. T. helluo resides in most states in the eastern half of the US. They can be found as far west as Kansas and Nebraska.[2]

Reproduction and life cycle

Mating for T. helluo usually occurs in May or June. Males will live for just over one year while females will often live for around two years.[7] Maturation occurs in males between May and September. Egg sacs are made in May and July, and can range from 8–12 mm in size (diameter). The eggs by themselves can appear tan or yellow and are around 1–2 mm in diameter. Females will carry these eggs in an egg sac on their back until they hatch. Even after hatching, the female will continue to carry the hatchlings on her back until they mature enough to hunt by themselves.[8] Female maturation can occur at any point during the year. Once mature, females will begin to overwinter during colder months.[2] Males will typically die before it gets too cold.

As T. helluo matures, it will molt periodically. Time and duration of molting is dependent on nutritional intake and consequent growth potential. The frequency of molting is based on an individual T. helluo's nutritional reserves. Individuals that feed more often will molt less frequently in their process of maturation.[7]

Mating

Female-male dimorphism

Tigrosa helluo is sexually dimorphic. In this species, the two sexes dramatically differ in size, with mature females being larger than males. Typically, females will grow to weigh more than 300 mg with carapace widths of around 6.5 mm while males will usually only weigh in excess of 200 mg and have carapace widths of around 4.5 mm.[9]

Sexual Cannibalism

Like many other wolf spiders, T. helluo will engage in precopulatory and post copulatory sexual cannibalism. The frequency at which females participate in sexual cannibalism depends on a variety of factors. The degree of sexual dimorphism between two spiders has been shown to have an effect on the occurrence of sexual cannibalism. Males who are smaller are more vulnerable to larger females and therefore are more likely to be cannibalized. The larger the degree of size difference between the male and female, the more likely for sexual cannibalism to occur. Thus, sexual cannibalism in T. helluo can be viewed similarly to a predator-prey interaction where size difference affects their actions. Another factor that impacts the degree of sexual cannibalism for T. helluo is the female condition. Females who have been starved and therefore are hungry are more likely to cannibalize than females who are well-fed. It is possible that males can maximize their fitness by only mating with well-fed females. The male condition can also affect the possibility of sexual cannibalism. Older males or males in poorer condition, while they might not be very small, are more vulnerable to females. Therefore, they are more likely to alter their copulatory behavior depending on their perceived risk of being cannibalized. These males can invest more into a single copulation by engaging for longer because they are at a high risk of being eaten after mating.[10]

Copulation

The process of copulation for T. helluo consists of a series of interactions between the male palp and the female epigynum. First, the male will mount the female such that they are facing opposite from each other. The underside of the male's cephalothorax is positioned against the dorsal section of the female’s abdomen. The male then will signal the female to rotate the abdomen by touching the anterior of the female abdomen. After this, the male will use his palp to engage with the female’s abdomen and epigynum. The right and left palps will interact with the right and left sides of the epigynum. After the palp and epigynum are engaged, the male will expand his hematodocha, causing his embolus to enter the female copulatory duct. Semen is then exchanged. This interaction is called an insertion. During a single insertion, the male may also expand his hematodocha multiple times. However, it is often only a single expansion per insertion. T. helluo will also engage in more than one insertion per copulation. Usually, one insertion will happen per side of the male palp. Copulation for T. helluo will typically lasts around 8 minutes.[11]

Diet

Prey

Wolf spiders typically eat different kinds of insects or even other smaller spiders like Pardosa milvina.[12] They are nocturnal so they wait for prey and hunt at night.[13] T. helluo can survive on insects such as crickets, fly grubs, cockroaches, mealworms, and even beetles.[14]

Effects of diet on survivorship

Tigrosa helluo is able to feed on a large variety of prey, and thus enjoys a mixed diet of different insects. A 1992 study assessing the effects of polytypic vs monotypic diets on wolf spiders found that T. helluo individuals raised on polytypic diets had significantly higher survivorship and reached sexual maturity earlier than individuals consuming a monotypic diet. Certain body parts like the cephalothorax and legs were also significantly larger at maturity in the polytypic diet group.[14]

Effects of diet on behavior

A 1999 study examining the effect of feeding on burrow construction for T. helluo reported that hunger level significantly impacts T. helluo’s behavioral decisions. In comparison to starved spiders, well fed individuals had a better nutritional state and made significantly more burrows. Since males do not make burrows, they were not included in the study.[15]

Predators

Tigrosa helluo female

Although they are hunters, wolf spiders are also preyed upon by other organisms such as praying mantises, birds, wasps, small reptiles, and even other spiders. Lycosidae have fantastic vision and are sensitive to vibrations, so they use these senses to detect and evade predators. They also use their speed and camouflage from their natural coloring to avoid predators. Females of the species T. helluo make burrows in secluded habitats, such as underneath stones, that can also function as a place to hide from predators. If needed, T. helluo can also bite predators and inject venom.[14]

Behavior

Hunting

Tigrosa helluo typically switch between a few different foraging sites. Females build burrows of silk and wait for prey to show up in their current foraging site. Males typically roam around and wait for prey. Like all wolf spiders, T. helluo are solitary hunters and will hunt alone, only meeting with other spiders to mate.[14]

Chemical cues in hunting

A 2001 study examining chemical cues in T. helluo suggests that T. helluo is able to detect chemical cues from recently hunted prey. The spiders will show a preference for chemical cues that match that of their most recently hunted prey. Thus, further hunting activities will show a dietary preference for the prey species most recently consumed.[16]

It has also been shown that the presence of glyphosate-based herbicide affects prey capture behavior of T. helluo. In the presence of herbicide, T. helluo is better able to detect and orient itself towards prey and therefore was able to more efficiently subdue prey[17]

Communication

While wolf spiders are solitary and don’t usually associate with others outside of mating, communication between individual spiders does occur occasionally. Wolf spiders have some of the best vision out of all spiders, so they use visual cues, such as waving their pedipalps, to signal to each other for mating. They are also sensitive to vibrations, scent, and taste.[13]

Bites

Bites to humans

Wolf spiders are usually not aggressive and will not bite unless readily provoked. They also possess venom that is injected into organisms upon biting. However, to humans, wolf spider bites are generally considered minor and not medically significant. Bites typically cause minor swelling and pain, but no severe complications. Antivenom is not usually needed to treat wolf spider bites.[18]

Differences from Pardosa milvina

Both Pardosa milvina and Tigrosa helluo are the more common wolf spider species in the United States. They have behavioral differences in their hunting approaches since T. helluo tends to wait for prey to pass by their location prior to attacking them, whereas P. milvina goes out to find its prey. In addition, P. milvina are much smaller in size compared to T. helluo, and therefore are preyed upon by T. helluo.[12]

References

  1. "Taxon details Tigrosa helluo Walckenaer, 1837", World Spider Catalog, Natural History Museum Bern, retrieved 2016-04-21
  2. Brady, Allen (2012). "Nearctic species of the new genus Tigrosa (Araneae: Lycosidae)". American Arachnological Society. 40: 182–208 via JSTOR.
  3. Beleznai, Orsolya; Dreyer, Jamin; Tóth, Zoltán; Samu, Ferenc (2017-08-04). "Natural enemies partially compensate for warming induced excess herbivory in an organic growth system". Scientific Reports. 7. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-07509-w. ISSN 2045-2322. PMC 5544682. PMID 28779159.
  4. Allen R. Brady "Nearctic species of the new genus Tigrosa (Araneae: Lycosidae)," The Journal of Arachnology 40(2), 182-208, (1 August 2012). https://doi.org/10.1636/K11-77.1
  5. Muma, M. H. (1943). Common spiders of Maryland. Natural History Society of Maryland, Baltimore, 179 pp.
  6. Kaston, B. J. (1948). Spiders of Connecticut. Bulletin of the Connecticut State Geological and Natural History Survey 70: 1-874.
  7. Balfour, R. (2004). Differences in the growth of the wolf spider Hogna helluo (Araneae: Lycosidae) reared under high and low food quantity diets. (Electronic Thesis or Dissertation). Retrieved from https://etd.ohiolink.edu/
  8. "Common Spiders of Maryland - Maryland's Wild Acres". dnr.maryland.gov. Retrieved 2020-10-21.
  9. Balfour, R. (2004). Differences in the growth of the wolf spider Hogna helluo (Araneae: Lycosidae) reared under high and low food quantity diets. (Electronic Thesis or Dissertation). Retrieved from https://etd.ohiolink.edu/
  10. Wilder, Shawn M.; Rypstra, Ann L. (2008-08-01). "Sexual size dimorphism mediates the occurrence of state-dependent sexual cannibalism in a wolf spider". Animal Behaviour. 76 (2): 447–454. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.12.023. ISSN 0003-3472.
  11. Stratton, G.E., Hebets, E.A., Miller, P.R., & Miller, G. (1996). PATTERN AND DURATION OF COPULATION IN WOLF SPIDERS (ARANEAE, LYCOSIDAE).
  12. Sitvarin, Michael I.; Gordon, Shira D.; Uetz, George W.; Rypstra, Ann L. (2016). "The wolf spider Pardosa milvina detects predator threat level using only vibratory cues". Behaviour. 153 (2): 159–173. ISSN 0005-7959.
  13. "BioKIDS - Kids' Inquiry of Diverse Species, Lycosidae: INFORMATION". www.biokids.umich.edu. Retrieved 2020-10-21.
  14. Uetz, George W.; Bischoff, Jennifer; Raver, Joseph (1992). "Survivorship of Wolf Spiders (Lycosidae) Reared on Different Diets". The Journal of Arachnology. 20 (3): 207–211. ISSN 0161-8202.
  15. Walker, Sean E.; Marshall, Samuel D.; Rypstra, Ann L. (1999). "The Effect of Feeding History on Retreat Construction in the Wolf Spider Hogna helluo (Araneae, Lycosidae)". The Journal of Arachnology. 27 (3): 689–691. ISSN 0161-8202.
  16. Persons, Matthew H.; Rypstra, Ann L. (2000). "Preference for Chemical Cues Associated with Recent Prey in the Wolf Spider Hogna helluo (Araneae: Lycosidae)". Ethology. 106 (1): 27–35. doi:10.1046/j.1439-0310.2000.00496.x. ISSN 1439-0310.
  17. Rittman, Sandra; Wrinn, Kerri M.; Evans, Samuel C.; Webb, Alex W.; Rypstra, Ann L. (October 2013). "Glyphosate-Based Herbicide Has Contrasting Effects on Prey Capture by Two Co-Occurring Wolf Spider Species". Journal of Chemical Ecology. 39 (10): 1247–1253. doi:10.1007/s10886-013-0353-5. ISSN 0098-0331.
  18. Ribeiro, Lindioneza Adriano; Jorge, Miguel Tanús; Piesco, Roberto Vaz; de Andrade Nishioka, Sérgio (1990-01-01). "Wolf spider bites in São Paulo, Brazil: A clinical and epidemiological study of 515 cases". Toxicon. 28 (6): 715–717. doi:10.1016/0041-0101(90)90260-E. ISSN 0041-0101.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.