Wars of the Roses (album)

In an interview with Puregrainaudio.com, Rygg commented on the inspiration behind Wars Of The Roses, “I think the last couple of years we've been getting kind of wanting to make not only kind of cinematical [music] but also pictorial lyrics to accompany it, so I think that kind of an idea we've taken a bit further this time, whereas the music itself is a bit more fragmented, the songs are more of [individual] pieces, as opposed to Shadows, which was a more holistic thing. Also lyrically, it may be a bit more internalised on this one. It's kind of like painting lyrical postcards almost, touching on cultural traditions and things like that.”[4]

Rygg commented on working with Daniel O'Sullivan, “He's also very involved… and he was a very big resource this time in the live context… because there is a certain kind of method to our madness and that's something that he's had to kind of work within that kind of [framework]. So, put it this way: The album would have sounded different if he wasn't part of it. There's a reason why we invited him to become a member, and it's not only to do with the fact that he's a big musician. It's kind of a shared sensibility.”[4]

Professional ratings

Review scores
Source	Rating
AllMusic	[5]
Metal Storm	(8.7/10)[6]
Sea of Tranquility	[2]
Prog Sphere	(favorable)[7]
Sputnikmusic	[3]

Upon release, Wars of the Roses received generally positive reviews from music critics.

Murat Batmaz, writing for Sea of Tranquility webzine, commented, “It amalgamates musical traits from its predecessors while re-shaping them with a more direct approach. The album derives its power from being extremely varied, as it is comprised by far-reaching sonic experiments."[2]

Conor Fynes, writing for Prog Sphere, comments, “The strength of War Of The Roses is in its grand instrumentation and clever electronic arrangements. It’s certainly an album that grows with each listen; after all, hasn’t the music of Ulver always been one to play hard-to-get?“[7]

Rating the album 4/5, SputnikMusic, commented, “While this may prove to be one of their most challenging releases, in time, it may also prove to be one of the most rewarding. Garm and company have prepared a bleak and entrancing journey meant to be taken time and again. Regardless of favor, it accomplishes that which true art is purposed - making one think. Wars of the Roses’ thoughtful conception and execution serves only for a thoughtful listen. After all this time, it still remains a privilege to bear witness to these wolves evolve once again.”[3]

William Ruhlmann, writing for AllMusic, commented, “Over more than a decade and a half, listeners have learned to expect the unexpected from Ulver, who started out as a Norwegian heavy metal band but have turned far more experimental. Wars of the Roses begins sounding like a fairly conventional rock album, in which the mainstream track "February MMX" boasts socially conscious lyrics, and "September IV" also suggests mainstream rock. But more of the album is given over to selections like "Norwegian Gothic" and especially the nearly 15-minute closer, "Stone Angels," with slow, ambient tracks featuring sound effects and poetic, spoken word vocals written by poet Keith Waldrop. The closest antecedent, notably on "England" and "Island," with their slow, ponderous tempos and calm vocals, is Pink Floyd, making Ulver as of 2011 something of a neo-progressive rock band.”[5]

Webzine Metal Storm commented, “Wars of the Roses almost seems to be a bit of a retrospective of the past dozen years of the band's existence. This album is slow, mellow, moody, melancholic, and heavily atmospheric.”[6]

Zero Tolerance described the album as "quite beautiful record of startlingly powerful depth".[8]

• Jester Records – ULVER Wars of the Roses Page about Wars of the Roses.
• NoCleanSinging Review
• The Death of CDs review
• Allmusic review