Worcestershire v Somerset, 1979

Worcestershire hosted the match at their New Road ground.

The match was scheduled to be played on Wednesday, 23 May 1979, at Worcestershire's New Road ground in Worcester, but rain prevented play and the match was moved to the following day.[10] The same thing happened in Watford, where Glamorgan and the Minor Counties were due to play.[14] Although it was overcast and slightly wet the next morning, play started on time. Rose won the toss for Somerset and chose to bat, opening the batting himself alongside Peter Denning. Worcestershire's Vanburn Holder bowled the first over, which consisted of seven deliveries as it included a no-ball, to Rose, who did not play any scoring shots. The Somerset captain declared the innings closed at the end of the over. Somerset had scored just one run, which they were awarded for the no-ball, and Worcestershire only needed two runs to win. The players left the field for the ten-minute break between innings,[10] and when they returned Glenn Turner and Alan Ormrod opened Worcestershire's batting. Colin Dredge bowled the first over for Somerset, and Turner scored one run from it. Keith Jennings bowled the second over, and Turner scored a single from the fourth delivery which gave Worcestershire the victory.[15]

Play lasted for just 18 minutes (of which 10 minutes were the interval between innings) and 16 legal deliveries. There were around 100 spectators at the ground, but many others were just arriving or still travelling when the match ended. Charles Burnett was supposed to select the man of the match, but in light of the nature of the game, he decided that it would not be appropriate to make such a selection.[10]

• Toss: Somerset won the toss and elected to bat first
• Result: Worcestershire won by ten wickets[15]

Somerset batting innings

Batsman	Method of dismissal	Runs
Brian Rose *	not out	0
Peter Denning	not out	0
Extras	(1 no-ball)	1
Totals	(1.0 overs)	1/0 dec.
Did not bat: Peter Roebuck, Viv Richards, Ian Botham, Vic Marks, Dennis Breakwell, Derek Taylor , Hallam Moseley, Colin Dredge, Keith Jennings

Worcestershire batting innings

Batsman	Method of dismissal	Runs
Glenn Turner	not out	2
Alan Ormrod	not out	0
Extras		0
Totals	(1.4 overs)	2/0
Did not bat: Phil Neale, Ted Hemsley, Younis Ahmed, Dipak Patel, David Humphries , Vanburn Holder, John Inchmore, Norman Gifford *, Paul Pridgeon

Umpires:

• Terry Spencer and Jack van Geloven

Key

• * – Captain
• † – Wicket-keeper

The small crowd at the ground were angered by the result, such that Worcestershire's secretary Mike Vockins apologised and gave all those present a full refund, describing Somerset's declaration as "an absolute disgrace". Some Somerset fans had travelled over 150 miles (240 km) to watch the game; Alan Gibson of The Times had just arrived at the railway station when he was told by a porter that he might as well head back as the match had finished.[10] The Somerset team left the ground 14 minutes after the end of the game and, as they were leaving, a Worcestershire fan banged on Rose's car window and shouted at him, "You've done a terrible thing for cricket."[17]

The wet weather that delayed the match continued for most of the week, leaving the newspaper cricket journalists with little to write about other than the "Worcester affair". Some speculated that the Somerset players had placed bets on Worcestershire winning.[4] John Arlott of The Guardian contended that Rose "did not infringe them [the rules of the competition], he exploited them". His newspaper blamed the action on the TCCB, suggesting that the rules, not the players, were to blame.[11] The Daily Telegraph's Tony Winlaw was scathing, suggesting that cricket had reached one of its lowest points due to Rose's declaration.[17] Gordon Ross, writing in The Cricketer, was similarly hard on Somerset, saying that although the team had won, the game of cricket, along with its supporters and sponsors, had lost.[17] In their end-of-year summary, the Wisden Cricketers' Almanack was disdainful of the declaration, writing that Rose had "sacrificed all known cricketing principles by deliberately losing the game".[1] Despite this condemnation, Rose was still named as one of five Wisden Cricketers of the Year, primarily for captaining Somerset to their first major honours.[18]

Rose defended his actions, claiming that he had no other option, and that his "first duty is to Somerset. If anybody wishes to complain, he should do it to the people who make the rules."[8] Somerset's president, Colin Atkinson, spoke to representatives from Worcestershire the day after the game and offered a replay, but his suggestion was rejected because of logistical issues and fixture congestion.[6] The TCCB chairman, Carr, made a statement after the game that "Somerset's action is totally contrary to the spirit of the competition, but is not in breach of the rules as they are written" and announced that an inquiry would be held at season's end.[4] Owing to the strength and number of complaints, a special meeting of the TCCB was called for 1 June. At that meeting, Somerset were ejected from the competition by seventeen votes to one; only the representative from Derbyshire opposed it, and even Somerset voted for the expulsion, saying Rose would have his position as captain reviewed. As a result of Somerset's ejection, Glamorgan joined Worcestershire in the quarter-finals. If Somerset had played the game as normal, they would have qualified: Glamorgan's match against the Minor Counties ended with no result because of rain, leaving them two points behind Somerset and Worcestershire.[10]

Although Atkinson initially gave a public apology, and stated that the declaration could not be defended,[8] he later suggested that Somerset were victims of a kangaroo court, and that the meeting had happened at a point when the topic was still emotive and people wanted retribution. Kerslake, the Somerset chairman, offered to resign, and Rose considered doing likewise; both eventually continued in their roles.[6] The Somerset players, who felt that the press treated them like criminals, were concerned about the reception they might receive at their next match, a home fixture against Hampshire. In the event, the team were cheered onto the pitch; Rose was given an individual standing ovation when he batted.[4] A few supporters at the match hung out a banner stating "It's Brian Rose I do declare!"[10]

Somerset went on to win the Gillette Cup and John Player League that season,[19] while Worcestershire were eliminated from the Benson & Hedges Cup in the quarter-finals by Surrey.[20] The organising committee of the 1979 Cricket World Cup, which was held in England, met in early June and decided that declarations would not be allowed during the tournament to prevent a repeat of the incident.[21] The laws of cricket were subsequently altered to ban declarations in one-day cricket.[22] Arlott suggested that the strong action taken by the TCCB meant that it was unlikely that captains would seek to exploit any loopholes in the future.[23] David Frith, writing for Wisden Cricket Monthly, was similarly hopeful that the action taken would prevent any further instances of poor sportsmanship. Just under two years later, Trevor Chappell bowled the last delivery of a One Day International match underarm to prevent New Zealand from scoring the six runs they needed for victory.[10] The delivery was within the laws of the game, but was widely condemned for being against the spirit of cricket.[24]

New Zealanders were also involved in a further attempted exploitation of a rule loophole in 1990, in a domestic match between the Wellington and Canterbury provincial teams. Wellington needed maximum points from their match to seal the Shell Trophy championship, but Canterbury's lower order batsmen dug in to play out a draw. In an attempt to tempt the Canterbury players into some rash shots, the Wellington captain Ervin McSweeney asked part-time bowler Bert Vance to deliberately bowl poor deliveries which the batsmen would be tempted to play at. With so many wides and no-balls, both scorers and umpires lost track, and in the end only five legitimate deliveries were bowled in Vance's 22-ball over, which had 77 runs taken off it.[25]

Another incident occurred in Welsh club cricket in 2017, when Carew Cricket Club declared their final match of the season on 18 for one. They had worked out that a loss would still result in them winning the league as long as their opponents, who were second in the league, did not score any batting or bowling bonus points. Carew retained their victory over Pembroke County Cricket Club and their league title, but a league disciplinary committee decided to relegate the team, imposed a £300 fine, and suspended their captain for the start of the following season.[26]