2010–11 Sussex County Football League
The 2010–11 Sussex County Football League season was the 86th in the history of Sussex County Football League a football competition in England.[1][2]
Division One
Season | 2010–11 |
---|---|
Champions | Crawley Down |
Promoted | Crawley Down |
Relegated | Eastbourne United Association |
Matches played | 380 |
Goals scored | 1,296 (3.41 per match) |
← 2009–10 2011–12 → |
Division One featured 18 clubs which competed in the division last season, along with two new clubs, promoted from Division Two:
League table
Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Qualification or relegation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Crawley Down | 38 | 28 | 7 | 3 | 100 | 35 | +65 | 91 | Promoted to the Isthmian League |
2 | Rye United | 38 | 23 | 7 | 8 | 76 | 37 | +39 | 76 | |
3 | Peacehaven & Telscombe | 38 | 22 | 10 | 6 | 74 | 38 | +36 | 76 | |
4 | Pagham | 38 | 23 | 2 | 13 | 91 | 53 | +38 | 71 | |
5 | Three Bridges | 38 | 23 | 1 | 14 | 69 | 49 | +20 | 70 | |
6 | Hassocks | 38 | 19 | 11 | 8 | 64 | 38 | +26 | 68 | |
7 | East Grinstead Town | 38 | 20 | 6 | 12 | 88 | 50 | +38 | 66 | |
8 | Redhill | 38 | 16 | 8 | 14 | 77 | 68 | +9 | 56 | |
9 | Arundel | 38 | 15 | 9 | 14 | 81 | 68 | +13 | 54 | |
10 | Ringmer | 38 | 16 | 4 | 18 | 67 | 72 | −5 | 52 | |
11 | Lingfield | 38 | 13 | 10 | 15 | 71 | 83 | −12 | 49 | |
12 | Crowborough Athletic | 38 | 14 | 6 | 18 | 59 | 67 | −8 | 48 | |
13 | Sidley United | 38 | 13 | 9 | 16 | 46 | 59 | −13 | 48 | |
14 | Chichester City | 38 | 14 | 6 | 18 | 57 | 62 | −5 | 45[lower-alpha 1] | |
15 | Wick | 38 | 13 | 6 | 19 | 54 | 74 | −20 | 45 | Demoted to Division Two |
16 | Hailsham Town | 38 | 13 | 5 | 20 | 66 | 71 | −5 | 44 | |
17 | Selsey | 38 | 13 | 5 | 20 | 49 | 78 | −29 | 44 | |
18 | Shoreham | 38 | 8 | 7 | 23 | 46 | 89 | −43 | 31 | |
19 | St Francis Rangers | 38 | 8 | 5 | 25 | 35 | 81 | −46 | 29 | |
20 | Eastbourne United Association | 38 | 2 | 4 | 32 | 26 | 124 | −98 | 10 | Relegated to Division Two |
Source: fchd
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
Notes:
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
Notes:
- Chichester City were deducted three points.
Division Two
Season | 2010–11 |
---|---|
Champions | A.F.C. Uckfield |
Promoted | A.F.C. Uckfield Lancing Worthing United |
Relegated | Clymping |
Matches played | 306 |
Goals scored | 1,163 (3.8 per match) |
← 2009–10 2011–12 → |
Division Two featured 16 clubs which competed in the division last season, along with two new clubs:
- Bexhill United, promoted from Division Three
- Mile Oak, relegated from Division One
Also, Wealden changed name to A.F.C. Uckfield.
League table
Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Qualification or relegation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | A.F.C. Uckfield | 34 | 24 | 7 | 3 | 107 | 47 | +60 | 79 | Promoted to Division One |
2 | Lancing | 34 | 24 | 6 | 4 | 103 | 30 | +73 | 78 | |
3 | Worthing United | 34 | 22 | 7 | 5 | 84 | 38 | +46 | 73 | |
4 | Bexhill United | 34 | 17 | 9 | 8 | 71 | 47 | +24 | 60 | |
5 | Seaford Town | 34 | 16 | 10 | 8 | 69 | 42 | +27 | 58 | |
6 | Loxwood | 34 | 18 | 4 | 12 | 71 | 51 | +20 | 58 | |
7 | Mile Oak | 34 | 18 | 4 | 12 | 71 | 52 | +19 | 58 | |
8 | Storrington | 34 | 15 | 4 | 15 | 64 | 57 | +7 | 49 | |
9 | Rustington | 34 | 14 | 7 | 13 | 51 | 46 | +5 | 49 | |
10 | Westfield | 34 | 14 | 7 | 13 | 67 | 70 | −3 | 49 | |
11 | Littlehampton Town | 34 | 12 | 9 | 13 | 71 | 72 | −1 | 45 | |
12 | Southwick | 34 | 13 | 6 | 15 | 55 | 59 | −4 | 45 | |
13 | Little Common | 34 | 12 | 7 | 15 | 55 | 61 | −6 | 43 | |
14 | East Preston | 34 | 9 | 7 | 18 | 57 | 84 | −27 | 34 | |
15 | Midhurst & Easebourne | 34 | 7 | 6 | 21 | 40 | 74 | −34 | 27 | |
16 | Steyning Town | 34 | 6 | 7 | 21 | 52 | 103 | −51 | 25 | |
17 | Oakwood | 34 | 3 | 7 | 24 | 42 | 100 | −58 | 16 | |
18 | Clymping | 34 | 3 | 4 | 27 | 33 | 130 | −97 | 13 | Relegated to Division Three |
Source: fchd
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
Division Three
Season | 2010–11 |
---|---|
Champions | Dorking Wanderers |
Promoted | Dorking Wanderers |
Matches played | 240 |
Goals scored | 941 (3.92 per match) |
← 2009–10 2011–12 → |
Division Three featured 14 clubs which competed in the division last season, along with two new clubs:
- Barnham, joined from the West Sussex League
- Ferring, joined from the Worthing & District League
League table
Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Qualification or relegation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Dorking Wanderers | 30 | 24 | 2 | 4 | 93 | 35 | +58 | 74 | Promoted to Division Two |
2 | Hurstpierpoint | 30 | 18 | 4 | 8 | 61 | 37 | +24 | 58 | |
3 | Barnham | 30 | 16 | 7 | 7 | 60 | 39 | +21 | 55 | |
4 | Bosham | 30 | 17 | 4 | 9 | 73 | 55 | +18 | 55 | |
5 | Saltdean United | 30 | 15 | 6 | 9 | 71 | 49 | +22 | 51 | |
6 | Broadbridge Heath | 30 | 15 | 4 | 11 | 61 | 45 | +16 | 49 | |
7 | Newhaven | 30 | 15 | 1 | 14 | 73 | 64 | +9 | 46 | |
8 | Haywards Heath Town | 30 | 12 | 6 | 12 | 52 | 56 | −4 | 42 | |
9 | Pease Pottage Village | 30 | 12 | 5 | 13 | 66 | 62 | +4 | 41 | |
10 | Rottingdean Village | 30 | 11 | 6 | 13 | 41 | 49 | −8 | 39 | |
11 | T D Shipley | 30 | 9 | 7 | 14 | 58 | 71 | −13 | 34 | |
12 | Ferring | 30 | 9 | 6 | 15 | 56 | 67 | −11 | 33 | |
13 | Ifield Edwards | 30 | 8 | 6 | 16 | 48 | 76 | −28 | 30 | |
14 | Uckfield Town | 30 | 8 | 5 | 17 | 49 | 76 | −27 | 29 | |
15 | Forest | 30 | 6 | 8 | 16 | 40 | 68 | −28 | 26 | |
16 | Sidlesham | 30 | 4 | 5 | 21 | 39 | 92 | −53 | 17 | Relegated to the West Sussex League |
Source: fchd
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
References
- "Sussex County Football League 2003–2012". Non League Matters.
- "SCFL Historic League Tables". Southern Combination Football League. Archived from the original on 2019-01-19. Retrieved 2019-02-08.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.