2009–10 Sussex County Football League
The 2009–10 Sussex County Football League season was the 85th in the history of Sussex County Football League a football competition in England.[1][2]
Division One
Season | 2009–10 |
---|---|
Champions | Whitehawk |
Promoted | Whitehawk |
Relegated | Mile Oak |
Matches played | 380 |
Goals scored | 1,314 (3.46 per match) |
← 2008–09 2010–11 → |
Division One featured 16 clubs which competed in the division last season, along with four new clubs.
- Clubs promoted from Division Two:
- Plus:
- Crowborough Athletic, relegated from the Isthmian League
Also, Chichester City United changed name to Chichester City.
League table
Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Qualification or relegation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Whitehawk | 38 | 26 | 7 | 5 | 85 | 36 | +49 | 85 | Promoted to the Isthmian League |
2 | Peacehaven & Telscombe | 38 | 23 | 9 | 6 | 83 | 42 | +41 | 78 | |
3 | Chichester City | 38 | 21 | 6 | 11 | 87 | 51 | +36 | 69 | |
4 | Wick | 38 | 19 | 10 | 9 | 80 | 58 | +22 | 67 | |
5 | Redhill | 38 | 18 | 11 | 9 | 65 | 49 | +16 | 65 | |
6 | Eastbourne United Association | 38 | 16 | 9 | 13 | 70 | 63 | +7 | 57 | |
7 | Three Bridges | 38 | 16 | 7 | 15 | 78 | 56 | +22 | 55 | |
8 | Crawley Down | 38 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 71 | 76 | −5 | 54 | |
9 | Shoreham | 38 | 15 | 8 | 15 | 63 | 59 | +4 | 53 | |
10 | Lingfield | 38 | 12 | 16 | 10 | 69 | 67 | +2 | 52 | |
11 | Selsey | 38 | 13 | 12 | 13 | 70 | 70 | 0 | 51 | |
12 | Arundel | 38 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 74 | 71 | +3 | 49 | |
13 | Ringmer | 38 | 12 | 14 | 12 | 68 | 71 | −3 | 49[lower-alpha 1] | |
14 | Hassocks | 38 | 12 | 12 | 14 | 51 | 59 | −8 | 48 | |
15 | East Grinstead Town | 38 | 11 | 7 | 20 | 62 | 74 | −12 | 40 | |
16 | St Francis Rangers | 38 | 11 | 7 | 20 | 55 | 76 | −21 | 40 | |
17 | Pagham | 38 | 10 | 10 | 18 | 46 | 76 | −30 | 40 | |
18 | Crowborough Athletic | 38 | 11 | 4 | 23 | 51 | 101 | −50 | 37 | |
19 | Hailsham Town | 38 | 9 | 4 | 25 | 50 | 78 | −28 | 31 | |
20 | Mile Oak | 38 | 6 | 8 | 24 | 36 | 81 | −45 | 26 | Relegated to Division Two |
Source: fchd
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
Notes:
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
Notes:
- Ringmer were deducted one point.
Division Two
Season | 2009–10 |
---|---|
Champions | Rye United |
Promoted | Rye United Sidley United |
Relegated | Clymping |
Matches played | 306 |
Goals scored | 1,109 (3.62 per match) |
← 2008–09 2010–11 → |
Division Two featured 13 clubs which competed in the division last season, along with five new clubs.
- Clubs relegated from Division One:
- Clubs promoted from Division Three:
League table
Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Qualification or relegation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Rye United | 34 | 25 | 1 | 8 | 89 | 41 | +48 | 76 | Promoted to Division One |
2 | Worthing United | 34 | 22 | 8 | 4 | 73 | 26 | +47 | 74 | |
3 | Sidley United | 34 | 22 | 7 | 5 | 80 | 35 | +45 | 73 | Promoted to Division One |
4 | Little Common | 34 | 22 | 5 | 7 | 88 | 49 | +39 | 71 | |
5 | Loxwood | 34 | 18 | 7 | 9 | 74 | 37 | +37 | 61 | |
6 | Clymping | 34 | 16 | 8 | 10 | 77 | 50 | +27 | 56 | |
7 | Storrington | 34 | 17 | 1 | 16 | 55 | 65 | −10 | 52 | |
8 | Wealden | 34 | 15 | 5 | 14 | 56 | 56 | 0 | 50 | |
9 | Oakwood | 34 | 15 | 4 | 15 | 65 | 68 | −3 | 46[lower-alpha 1] | |
10 | Seaford Town | 34 | 14 | 4 | 16 | 61 | 65 | −4 | 46 | |
11 | Lancing | 34 | 14 | 3 | 17 | 61 | 82 | −21 | 45 | |
12 | Littlehampton Town | 34 | 12 | 7 | 15 | 61 | 60 | +1 | 43 | |
13 | Rustington | 34 | 11 | 9 | 14 | 53 | 64 | −11 | 42 | |
14 | East Preston | 34 | 12 | 5 | 17 | 55 | 69 | −14 | 41 | |
15 | Westfield | 34 | 11 | 4 | 19 | 46 | 69 | −23 | 37 | |
16 | Southwick | 34 | 5 | 7 | 22 | 48 | 72 | −24 | 22 | |
17 | Steyning Town | 34 | 4 | 7 | 23 | 36 | 86 | −50 | 19 | |
18 | Midhurst & Easebourne | 34 | 4 | 2 | 28 | 31 | 115 | −84 | 14 |
Source: fchd
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
Notes:
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
Notes:
- Oakwood were deducted three points.
Division Three
Season | 2009–10 |
---|---|
Champions | Bosham |
Promoted | Bexhill United |
Matches played | 210 |
Goals scored | 765 (3.64 per match) |
← 2008–09 2010–11 → |
Division Three featured twelve clubs which competed in the division last season, along with three new clubs:
- Bexhill United, relegated from Division Two
- Sidlesham, relegated from Division Two
- T D Shipley, joined from the West Sussex League
League table
Pos | Team | Pld | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Qualification or relegation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Bosham | 28 | 20 | 4 | 4 | 64 | 25 | +39 | 64 | |
2 | Bexhill United | 28 | 19 | 4 | 5 | 69 | 31 | +38 | 61 | Promoted to Division Two |
3 | Haywards Heath Town | 28 | 19 | 2 | 7 | 79 | 36 | +43 | 59 | |
4 | Dorking Wanderers | 28 | 15 | 6 | 7 | 78 | 44 | +34 | 51 | |
5 | Ifield Edwards | 28 | 14 | 5 | 9 | 61 | 43 | +18 | 47 | |
6 | Uckfield Town | 28 | 13 | 6 | 9 | 48 | 36 | +12 | 45 | |
7 | T D Shipley | 28 | 14 | 3 | 11 | 57 | 54 | +3 | 45 | |
8 | Saltdean United | 28 | 13 | 4 | 11 | 39 | 47 | −8 | 43 | |
9 | Newhaven | 28 | 11 | 3 | 14 | 55 | 50 | +5 | 36 | |
10 | Rottingdean Village | 28 | 10 | 4 | 14 | 44 | 56 | −12 | 34 | |
11 | Sidlesham | 28 | 10 | 3 | 15 | 38 | 54 | −16 | 33 | |
12 | Forest | 28 | 8 | 2 | 18 | 38 | 74 | −36 | 26 | |
13 | Pease Pottage Village | 28 | 7 | 2 | 19 | 30 | 74 | −44 | 23 | |
14 | Broadbridge Heath | 28 | 6 | 3 | 19 | 31 | 63 | −32 | 21 | |
15 | Hurstpierpoint | 28 | 3 | 5 | 20 | 34 | 78 | −44 | 14 |
Source: fchd
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored.
References
- "Sussex County Football League 2003–2012". Non League Matters.
- "SCFL Historic League Tables". Southern Combination Football League. Archived from the original on 2019-01-19. Retrieved 2019-02-08.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.