Lattice gauge theory

In lattice gauge theory, the spacetime is Wick rotated into Euclidean space and discretized into a lattice with sites separated by distance ${\displaystyle a}$ and connected by links. In the most commonly considered cases, such as lattice QCD, fermion fields are defined at lattice sites (which leads to fermion doubling), while the gauge fields are defined on the links. That is, an element U of the compact Lie group G (not algebra) is assigned to each link. Hence, to simulate QCD with Lie group SU(3), a 3×3 unitary matrix is defined on each link. The link is assigned an orientation, with the inverse element corresponding to the same link with the opposite orientation. And each node is given a value in ℂ³ (a color 3-vector, the space on which the fundamental representation of SU(3) acts), a bispinor (Dirac 4-spinor), an n_f vector, and a Grassmann variable.

Thus, the composition of links' SU(3) elements along a path (i.e. the ordered multiplication of their matrices) approximates a path-ordered exponential (geometric integral), from which Wilson loop values can be calculated for closed paths.

The Yang–Mills action is written on the lattice using Wilson loops (named after Kenneth G. Wilson), so that the limit ${\displaystyle a\to 0}$ formally reproduces the original continuum action.[1] Given a faithful irreducible representation ρ of G, the lattice Yang-Mills action is the sum over all lattice sites of the (real component of the) trace over the n links e₁, ..., e_n in the Wilson loop,

${\displaystyle S=\sum _{F}-\Re \{\chi ^{(\rho )}(U(e_{1})\cdots U(e_{n}))\}.}$

Here, χ is the character. If ρ is a real (or pseudoreal) representation, taking the real component is redundant, because even if the orientation of a Wilson loop is flipped, its contribution to the action remains unchanged.

There are many possible lattice Yang-Mills actions, depending on which Wilson loops are used in the action. The simplest "Wilson action" uses only the 1×1 Wilson loop, and differs from the continuum action by "lattice artifacts" proportional to the small lattice spacing ${\displaystyle a}$. By using more complicated Wilson loops to construct "improved actions", lattice artifacts can be reduced to be proportional to ${\displaystyle a^{2}}$, making computations more accurate.

This result of a Lattice QCD computation shows a meson, composed out of a quark and an antiquark. (After M. Cardoso et al.[2])

Quantities such as particle masses are stochastically calculated using techniques such as the Monte Carlo method. Gauge field configurations are generated with probabilities proportional to ${\displaystyle e^{-\beta S}}$, where ${\displaystyle S}$ is the lattice action and ${\displaystyle \beta }$ is related to the lattice spacing ${\displaystyle a}$. The quantity of interest is calculated for each configuration, and averaged. Calculations are often repeated at different lattice spacings ${\displaystyle a}$ so that the result can be extrapolated to the continuum, ${\displaystyle a\to 0}$.

Such calculations are often extremely computationally intensive, and can require the use of the largest available supercomputers. To reduce the computational burden, the so-called quenched approximation can be used, in which the fermionic fields are treated as non-dynamic "frozen" variables. While this was common in early lattice QCD calculations, "dynamical" fermions are now standard.[3] These simulations typically utilize algorithms based upon molecular dynamics or microcanonical ensemble algorithms.[4][5]

The results of lattice QCD computations show e.g. that in a meson not only the particles (quarks and antiquarks), but also the "fluxtubes" of the gluon fields are important.

Lattice gauge theory is also important for the study of quantum triviality by the real-space renormalization group.[6] The most important information in the RG flow are what's called the fixed points.

The possible macroscopic states of the system, at a large scale, are given by this set of fixed points. If these fixed points correspond to a free field theory, the theory is said to be trivial or noninteracting. Numerous fixed points appear in the study of lattice Higgs theories, but the nature of the quantum field theories associated with these remains an open question.[7]

Triviality has yet to be proven rigorously, but lattice computations have provided strong evidence for this. This fact is important as quantum triviality can be used to bound or even predict parameters such as the mass of Higgs boson.

Originally, solvable two-dimensional lattice gauge theories had already been introduced in 1971 as models with interesting statistical properties by the theorist Franz Wegner, who worked in the field of phase transitions.[8]

When only 1×1 Wilson loops appear in the action, Lattice gauge theory can be shown to be exactly dual to spin foam models.[9]

• Hamiltonian lattice gauge theory
• Lattice field theory
• Lattice QCD
• Quantum triviality

• M. Creutz, Quarks, gluons and lattices, Cambridge University Press 1985.
• I. Montvay and G. Münster, Quantum Fields on a Lattice, Cambridge University Press 1997.
• Y. Makeenko, Methods of contemporary gauge theory, Cambridge University Press 2002, ISBN 0-521-80911-8.
• J. Smit, Introduction to Quantum Fields on a Lattice, Cambridge University Press 2002.
• T. DeGrand and C. DeTar, Lattice Methods for Quantum Chromodynamics, World Scientific 2006.
• C. Gattringer and C. B. Lang, Quantum Chromodynamics on the Lattice, Springer 2010.
• Weisz Peter, Majumdar Pushan (2012). "Lattice gauge theories". Scholarpedia. 7 (4): 8615. Bibcode:2012SchpJ...7.8615M. doi:10.4249/scholarpedia.8615.

• The FermiQCD Library for Lattice Field theory
• US Lattice Quantum Chromodynamics Software Libraries